洛克伍德 III 型肩锁关节脱位手术治疗与保守治疗的疗效比较:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Chengxin Xie, Shaohua Fan, Lin Chen, Lingqin Huang, Cong Chen, Hua Luo
{"title":"洛克伍德 III 型肩锁关节脱位手术治疗与保守治疗的疗效比较:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Chengxin Xie, Shaohua Fan, Lin Chen, Lingqin Huang, Cong Chen, Hua Luo","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-08100-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still debated. Our aim is to conduct a meta-analysis of clinical studies evaluating the functional outcomes of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing exclusively on type III ACJ dislocation. A total of 244 patients from four studies were included. Outcomes measured included Constant scores (CS), coracoclavicular distance (CCD), pain, and complication rates. Heterogeneity was assessed and managed to ensure robust conclusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled results showed no significant difference in long-term functional outcomes, measured by CS, between surgical and conservative treatments (MD: 4.82, 95% CI: -6.42 to 16.06, P = 0.400). Surgical treatment provided better early pain relief and superior CCD at all follow-up points but did not improve long-term outcomes. Complication rates were similar for both treatments, though surgical intervention had a higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and hardware-related issues. Conservative treatment resulted in fewer complications and comparable long-term results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the evidence, while surgical treatment may offer early benefits in pain relief and CCD improvement, it does not enhance long-term functional outcomes and is associated with higher specific complication rates. Conservative treatment provides a viable alternative with fewer complications and similar long-term outcomes. These findings highlight the need for individualized treatment plans based on patient-specific factors and suggest further high-quality, long-term studies to refine management strategies for Type III AC joint dislocations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"960"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Chengxin Xie, Shaohua Fan, Lin Chen, Lingqin Huang, Cong Chen, Hua Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-024-08100-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still debated. Our aim is to conduct a meta-analysis of clinical studies evaluating the functional outcomes of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing exclusively on type III ACJ dislocation. A total of 244 patients from four studies were included. Outcomes measured included Constant scores (CS), coracoclavicular distance (CCD), pain, and complication rates. Heterogeneity was assessed and managed to ensure robust conclusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled results showed no significant difference in long-term functional outcomes, measured by CS, between surgical and conservative treatments (MD: 4.82, 95% CI: -6.42 to 16.06, P = 0.400). Surgical treatment provided better early pain relief and superior CCD at all follow-up points but did not improve long-term outcomes. Complication rates were similar for both treatments, though surgical intervention had a higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and hardware-related issues. Conservative treatment resulted in fewer complications and comparable long-term results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the evidence, while surgical treatment may offer early benefits in pain relief and CCD improvement, it does not enhance long-term functional outcomes and is associated with higher specific complication rates. Conservative treatment provides a viable alternative with fewer complications and similar long-term outcomes. These findings highlight the need for individualized treatment plans based on patient-specific factors and suggest further high-quality, long-term studies to refine management strategies for Type III AC joint dislocations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"960\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590540/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08100-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08100-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Rockwood III型肩锁关节(ACJ)脱位的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。我们的目的是对评估 Rockwood III 型肩锁关节脱位手术治疗与保守治疗功能效果的临床研究进行荟萃分析:我们在PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统检索,仅包括专门针对III型ACJ脱位的随机对照试验(RCT)。四项研究共纳入了 244 名患者。研究结果包括康斯坦茨评分(CS)、锁骨间距(CCD)、疼痛和并发症发生率。对异质性进行了评估和处理,以确保得出可靠的结论:汇总结果显示,手术治疗与保守治疗在以 CS 为指标的长期功能结果上无明显差异(MD:4.82,95% CI:-6.42 至 16.06,P = 0.400)。手术治疗能更好地缓解早期疼痛,在所有随访点的CCD均优于保守治疗,但并不能改善长期疗效。两种治疗方法的并发症发生率相似,但手术治疗的创伤后骨关节炎和硬件相关问题发生率更高。保守治疗的并发症较少,长期疗效相当:根据证据,虽然手术治疗可在早期缓解疼痛和改善 CCD,但并不能提高长期功能效果,而且与较高的特定并发症发生率相关。保守治疗是一种可行的替代方法,并发症较少,长期疗效相似。这些发现强调了根据患者的具体因素制定个性化治疗方案的必要性,并建议进一步开展高质量的长期研究,以完善 III 型交流关节脱位的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Optimal management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still debated. Our aim is to conduct a meta-analysis of clinical studies evaluating the functional outcomes of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing exclusively on type III ACJ dislocation. A total of 244 patients from four studies were included. Outcomes measured included Constant scores (CS), coracoclavicular distance (CCD), pain, and complication rates. Heterogeneity was assessed and managed to ensure robust conclusions.

Results: The pooled results showed no significant difference in long-term functional outcomes, measured by CS, between surgical and conservative treatments (MD: 4.82, 95% CI: -6.42 to 16.06, P = 0.400). Surgical treatment provided better early pain relief and superior CCD at all follow-up points but did not improve long-term outcomes. Complication rates were similar for both treatments, though surgical intervention had a higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and hardware-related issues. Conservative treatment resulted in fewer complications and comparable long-term results.

Conclusions: Based on the evidence, while surgical treatment may offer early benefits in pain relief and CCD improvement, it does not enhance long-term functional outcomes and is associated with higher specific complication rates. Conservative treatment provides a viable alternative with fewer complications and similar long-term outcomes. These findings highlight the need for individualized treatment plans based on patient-specific factors and suggest further high-quality, long-term studies to refine management strategies for Type III AC joint dislocations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信