气管造口术:为何、何时以及如何进行的最新进展。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Giulia Lais, Lise Piquilloud
{"title":"气管造口术:为何、何时以及如何进行的最新进展。","authors":"Giulia Lais, Lise Piquilloud","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this review is to summarize available data, including the most recent ones, to help develop the best possible strategy regarding the use of tracheostomy in ICU patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation or who experience loss of airway-protecting mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Tracheostomy facilitates the weaning process by reducing the patient's work of breathing and increasing comfort. It thus allows for a reduction in sedation levels. It also helps with secretions clearance, facilitates disconnection from the ventilator, and enables earlier phonation, oral intake, and mobilization. Despite these advantages, tracheostomy does not reduce mortality and is associated with both early and late complications, particularly tracheal stenosis. The timing of tracheostomy remains a subject of debate, and only a personalized approach that considers each patient's specific characteristics can help find the best possible compromise between avoiding unnecessary delays and minimizing the risks of performing a needless invasive procedure. In the absence of contraindications, the percutaneous single dilator technique under fibroscopic guidance should be the first choice, but only if the team is properly trained.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A step-by-step individualized approach based on the available evidence allows identifying the best strategy regarding the use of tracheostomy in ICU patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracheostomy: update on why, when and how.\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Lais, Lise Piquilloud\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this review is to summarize available data, including the most recent ones, to help develop the best possible strategy regarding the use of tracheostomy in ICU patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation or who experience loss of airway-protecting mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Tracheostomy facilitates the weaning process by reducing the patient's work of breathing and increasing comfort. It thus allows for a reduction in sedation levels. It also helps with secretions clearance, facilitates disconnection from the ventilator, and enables earlier phonation, oral intake, and mobilization. Despite these advantages, tracheostomy does not reduce mortality and is associated with both early and late complications, particularly tracheal stenosis. The timing of tracheostomy remains a subject of debate, and only a personalized approach that considers each patient's specific characteristics can help find the best possible compromise between avoiding unnecessary delays and minimizing the risks of performing a needless invasive procedure. In the absence of contraindications, the percutaneous single dilator technique under fibroscopic guidance should be the first choice, but only if the team is properly trained.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A step-by-step individualized approach based on the available evidence allows identifying the best strategy regarding the use of tracheostomy in ICU patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001224\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:本综述旨在总结现有数据(包括最新数据),以帮助制定关于在需要长期机械通气或失去气道保护机制的 ICU 患者中使用气管切开术的最佳策略:最新研究结果:气管切开术可减少患者的呼吸工作量,提高舒适度,从而促进断奶过程。因此可以降低镇静水平。它还有助于清除分泌物,方便与呼吸机断开连接,并能让患者更早地发音、进食和活动。尽管气管切开术有这些优点,但它并不能降低死亡率,而且与早期和晚期并发症有关,尤其是气管狭窄。气管造口术的时机仍是一个争论不休的话题,只有考虑到每位患者的具体特点,采取个性化的方法,才能在避免不必要的延误和减少不必要的侵入性手术风险之间找到最佳的折衷方案。在没有禁忌症的情况下,纤维镜引导下的经皮单扩张器技术应该是首选,但前提是医疗团队必须接受过适当的培训。总结:根据现有证据逐步采取个性化方法,可以确定在重症监护室患者中使用气管切开术的最佳策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracheostomy: update on why, when and how.

Purpose of review: The aim of this review is to summarize available data, including the most recent ones, to help develop the best possible strategy regarding the use of tracheostomy in ICU patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation or who experience loss of airway-protecting mechanisms.

Recent findings: Tracheostomy facilitates the weaning process by reducing the patient's work of breathing and increasing comfort. It thus allows for a reduction in sedation levels. It also helps with secretions clearance, facilitates disconnection from the ventilator, and enables earlier phonation, oral intake, and mobilization. Despite these advantages, tracheostomy does not reduce mortality and is associated with both early and late complications, particularly tracheal stenosis. The timing of tracheostomy remains a subject of debate, and only a personalized approach that considers each patient's specific characteristics can help find the best possible compromise between avoiding unnecessary delays and minimizing the risks of performing a needless invasive procedure. In the absence of contraindications, the percutaneous single dilator technique under fibroscopic guidance should be the first choice, but only if the team is properly trained.

Summary: A step-by-step individualized approach based on the available evidence allows identifying the best strategy regarding the use of tracheostomy in ICU patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信