复发性胶质母细胞瘤的再放射治疗:护理模式分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Susanne Rogers, Markus Gross, Ekin Ermis, Gizem Cosgun, Brigitta G Baumert, Thomas Mader, Christina Schroeder, Nicoletta Lomax, Sara Alonso, Adela Ademaj, Tessa Lazeroms, Seok-Yun Lee, Michael Mayinger, Christoph Mamot, Lucia Schwyzer, Gerrit A Schubert, Oliver Riesterer
{"title":"复发性胶质母细胞瘤的再放射治疗:护理模式分析。","authors":"Susanne Rogers, Markus Gross, Ekin Ermis, Gizem Cosgun, Brigitta G Baumert, Thomas Mader, Christina Schroeder, Nicoletta Lomax, Sara Alonso, Adela Ademaj, Tessa Lazeroms, Seok-Yun Lee, Michael Mayinger, Christoph Mamot, Lucia Schwyzer, Gerrit A Schubert, Oliver Riesterer","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-03954-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>90% of glioblastomas (GBM) relapse within two years of diagnosis. In contrast to the initial setting, there is no standard management for recurrent disease and options include hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation (re-mHSRT). The aims of this study were to investigate re-mHSRT practice in Swiss neuro-oncology centres.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of 18 questions regarding re-irradiation for GBM was created and distributed electronically (SurveyMonkey, USA) to 11 radiation oncologists in Switzerland specialising in brain tumours. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of a multicentre series of patients treated with an established re-mHSRT schedule to benchmark these against the literature and investigated the radiological patterns of relapse after re-mHSRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>8 of 11 (73%) radiation oncologists responded to the survey and re-irradiation practice was heterogeneous. The 10 × 3.5 Gy schedule (RTOG 1205, BRIOChe trials) was used by 5/8 respondents and 47/50 patients with recurrent GBM treated with re-mHSRT with this schedule in daily practice were included in the analysis. The median time to re-mHSRT following completion of adjuvant RT was 23.3 (7-224) months. The median PTV at re-mHSRT was 22.0 cm<sup>3</sup> (0.9-190). Combined CTV + PTV margins ranged from 0 to 10 mm and median prescription isodose was 80% (67-100). 14/47 (30%) patients received temozolomide and four (8.5%) continued bevacizumab concomitantly. On multivariable analysis, concomitant systemic therapy predicted for progression-free survival (PFS), HR 2.87 (95% CI 1-03-7.96), p = 0.042. Median PFS following re-mHSRT was 6.6 (0.2-92.5) months and 26/47 patients (55%) received subsequent systemic therapy. The median overall survival (OS) following recurrence was 11.8 months (1.5-92.5), similar to the 10.8 months in the literature with the same schedule. The six-month OS rate was 37/47 (79%), which compares well with the 73% reported in a meta-analysis of 50 publications employing various schedules. In a subgroup analysis of 36/47 (79%) patients with MR follow-up after re-mHSRT, 8/36 (22%) had no radiological evidence of tumour progression at a median follow-up of 9.4 months. 21/28 (75%) radiological relapses were in-field, two were marginal and five were out of field.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Re-mHSRT with 10 × 3.5 Gy can achieve local control in selected patients with recurrent GBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":"24 1","pages":"462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma: a pattern of care analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Rogers, Markus Gross, Ekin Ermis, Gizem Cosgun, Brigitta G Baumert, Thomas Mader, Christina Schroeder, Nicoletta Lomax, Sara Alonso, Adela Ademaj, Tessa Lazeroms, Seok-Yun Lee, Michael Mayinger, Christoph Mamot, Lucia Schwyzer, Gerrit A Schubert, Oliver Riesterer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12883-024-03954-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>90% of glioblastomas (GBM) relapse within two years of diagnosis. In contrast to the initial setting, there is no standard management for recurrent disease and options include hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation (re-mHSRT). The aims of this study were to investigate re-mHSRT practice in Swiss neuro-oncology centres.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of 18 questions regarding re-irradiation for GBM was created and distributed electronically (SurveyMonkey, USA) to 11 radiation oncologists in Switzerland specialising in brain tumours. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of a multicentre series of patients treated with an established re-mHSRT schedule to benchmark these against the literature and investigated the radiological patterns of relapse after re-mHSRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>8 of 11 (73%) radiation oncologists responded to the survey and re-irradiation practice was heterogeneous. The 10 × 3.5 Gy schedule (RTOG 1205, BRIOChe trials) was used by 5/8 respondents and 47/50 patients with recurrent GBM treated with re-mHSRT with this schedule in daily practice were included in the analysis. The median time to re-mHSRT following completion of adjuvant RT was 23.3 (7-224) months. The median PTV at re-mHSRT was 22.0 cm<sup>3</sup> (0.9-190). Combined CTV + PTV margins ranged from 0 to 10 mm and median prescription isodose was 80% (67-100). 14/47 (30%) patients received temozolomide and four (8.5%) continued bevacizumab concomitantly. On multivariable analysis, concomitant systemic therapy predicted for progression-free survival (PFS), HR 2.87 (95% CI 1-03-7.96), p = 0.042. Median PFS following re-mHSRT was 6.6 (0.2-92.5) months and 26/47 patients (55%) received subsequent systemic therapy. The median overall survival (OS) following recurrence was 11.8 months (1.5-92.5), similar to the 10.8 months in the literature with the same schedule. The six-month OS rate was 37/47 (79%), which compares well with the 73% reported in a meta-analysis of 50 publications employing various schedules. In a subgroup analysis of 36/47 (79%) patients with MR follow-up after re-mHSRT, 8/36 (22%) had no radiological evidence of tumour progression at a median follow-up of 9.4 months. 21/28 (75%) radiological relapses were in-field, two were marginal and five were out of field.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Re-mHSRT with 10 × 3.5 Gy can achieve local control in selected patients with recurrent GBM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590342/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03954-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03954-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:90%的胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)会在确诊后两年内复发。与最初的情况不同,复发疾病没有标准的治疗方法,可供选择的方案包括低分次立体定向再照射(re-mHSRT)。本研究旨在调查瑞士神经肿瘤中心的再立体定向放射治疗实践:方法:我们制作了一份包含 18 个问题的有关 GBM 再照射的调查表,并通过电子方式(SurveyMonkey,美国)分发给瑞士 11 位脑肿瘤放射肿瘤专家。我们评估了一个多中心系列患者的临床疗效,这些患者接受了既定的再放疗计划,以文献为基准,并调查了再放疗后复发的放射学模式:11位放射肿瘤学家中有8位(73%)对调查做出了回应,再照射的做法不尽相同。5/8的受访者使用10 × 3.5 Gy计划(RTOG 1205、BRIOChe试验),47/50的复发性GBM患者在日常实践中使用该计划接受了再放疗。在完成辅助 RT 后,再次接受 MHSRT 的中位时间为 23.3(7-224)个月。再次MHSRT时的PTV中位数为22.0 cm3(0.9-190)。CTV+PTV联合边缘为0至10毫米,处方等剂量中位数为80%(67-100)。14/47(30%)名患者接受了替莫唑胺治疗,4(8.5%)名患者继续同时使用贝伐单抗。经多变量分析,同时接受系统治疗可预测无进展生存期(PFS),HR 2.87 (95% CI 1-03-7.96),P = 0.042。再次接受MHSRT治疗后的中位生存期为6.6(0.2-92.5)个月,26/47名患者(55%)接受了后续系统治疗。复发后的中位总生存期(OS)为11.8个月(1.5-92.5),与文献中相同疗程的10.8个月相似。6个月的OS率为37/47(79%),与采用不同方案的50篇文献的荟萃分析报告的73%相近。在对36/47(79%)名在再次接受MHSRT后接受MR随访的患者进行的亚组分析中,8/36(22%)名患者在中位随访9.4个月时没有肿瘤进展的放射学证据。21/28(75%)例放射学复发为场内复发,2例为边缘复发,5例为场外复发:结论:对选定的复发性 GBM 患者,使用 10 × 3.5 Gy 的再 mHSRT 可以达到局部控制的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma: a pattern of care analysis.

Background: 90% of glioblastomas (GBM) relapse within two years of diagnosis. In contrast to the initial setting, there is no standard management for recurrent disease and options include hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation (re-mHSRT). The aims of this study were to investigate re-mHSRT practice in Swiss neuro-oncology centres.

Methods: A survey of 18 questions regarding re-irradiation for GBM was created and distributed electronically (SurveyMonkey, USA) to 11 radiation oncologists in Switzerland specialising in brain tumours. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of a multicentre series of patients treated with an established re-mHSRT schedule to benchmark these against the literature and investigated the radiological patterns of relapse after re-mHSRT.

Results: 8 of 11 (73%) radiation oncologists responded to the survey and re-irradiation practice was heterogeneous. The 10 × 3.5 Gy schedule (RTOG 1205, BRIOChe trials) was used by 5/8 respondents and 47/50 patients with recurrent GBM treated with re-mHSRT with this schedule in daily practice were included in the analysis. The median time to re-mHSRT following completion of adjuvant RT was 23.3 (7-224) months. The median PTV at re-mHSRT was 22.0 cm3 (0.9-190). Combined CTV + PTV margins ranged from 0 to 10 mm and median prescription isodose was 80% (67-100). 14/47 (30%) patients received temozolomide and four (8.5%) continued bevacizumab concomitantly. On multivariable analysis, concomitant systemic therapy predicted for progression-free survival (PFS), HR 2.87 (95% CI 1-03-7.96), p = 0.042. Median PFS following re-mHSRT was 6.6 (0.2-92.5) months and 26/47 patients (55%) received subsequent systemic therapy. The median overall survival (OS) following recurrence was 11.8 months (1.5-92.5), similar to the 10.8 months in the literature with the same schedule. The six-month OS rate was 37/47 (79%), which compares well with the 73% reported in a meta-analysis of 50 publications employing various schedules. In a subgroup analysis of 36/47 (79%) patients with MR follow-up after re-mHSRT, 8/36 (22%) had no radiological evidence of tumour progression at a median follow-up of 9.4 months. 21/28 (75%) radiological relapses were in-field, two were marginal and five were out of field.

Conclusions: Re-mHSRT with 10 × 3.5 Gy can achieve local control in selected patients with recurrent GBM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信