薄荷对血压的影响:对随机对照试验进行 GRADE 评估的系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Faezeh Nematolahi, Abbas Mohtashamian, Ghazal Kaveh, Nasrin Sharifi, Alireza Milajerdi
{"title":"薄荷对血压的影响:对随机对照试验进行 GRADE 评估的系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Faezeh Nematolahi, Abbas Mohtashamian, Ghazal Kaveh, Nasrin Sharifi, Alireza Milajerdi","doi":"10.1186/s12906-024-04701-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mentha consumption may associated with blood pressure improvement in humans, but the recent evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed inconsistent results. The present study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to investigate the effect of Mentha on blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To cover all relevant literature, a complete search was conducted across PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases before March 2024 using PRISMA guidelines. In addition, Google Scholar, SID databases, the reference lists of the related reviews, and meta-analyses were searched for this purpose. Also, a \"snowball search\" was applied to include other relevant trials that may have been missed. A random-effects model was used for quantitative data synthesis, with weight mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Standard methodologies were utilized to assess kappa statistics between the authors, GRADE evidence profiles, heterogeneity, meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 476 publications identified, seven RCTs were eligible and included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. There was perfect agreement in study selection between the reviewers (К statistic, 0.86; p < 0.001). Meta-analysis showed a 1.227 mmHg reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (95% CI: -6.61,4.16, p = 0.655), 2.997 mmHg reduction in long-term SBP (95% CI: -8.00,2.00, p = 0.241), 1.830 mmHg reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (95% CI: -5.06,1.40, p = 0.268), and 2.857 mmHg reduction in long-term DBP (95% CI: -6.01, 0.30, p = 0.076) after Mentha consumption in intervention group compared to control. In sub-group analysis, a statistically and clinically significant reduction in SBP and DBP was observed in the participants with ages above 30 years and in the participants with SBP > 130 mmHg or DBP > 80 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings showed that Mentha consumption might not have a statistically significant effect on lowering SBP, DBP, long-term SBP, and long-term DBP. However, it can lead to a clinically significant reduction in both long-term SBP and long-term DBP. Besides, Mentha may have potential benefits for patients with pre-hypertension and hypertension. Nevertheless, further well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm our results. PROSPERO Registration No: CRD42023459490.</p>","PeriodicalId":9128,"journal":{"name":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","volume":"24 1","pages":"406"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Mentha on blood pressure: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Faezeh Nematolahi, Abbas Mohtashamian, Ghazal Kaveh, Nasrin Sharifi, Alireza Milajerdi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12906-024-04701-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mentha consumption may associated with blood pressure improvement in humans, but the recent evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed inconsistent results. The present study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to investigate the effect of Mentha on blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To cover all relevant literature, a complete search was conducted across PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases before March 2024 using PRISMA guidelines. In addition, Google Scholar, SID databases, the reference lists of the related reviews, and meta-analyses were searched for this purpose. Also, a \\\"snowball search\\\" was applied to include other relevant trials that may have been missed. A random-effects model was used for quantitative data synthesis, with weight mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Standard methodologies were utilized to assess kappa statistics between the authors, GRADE evidence profiles, heterogeneity, meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 476 publications identified, seven RCTs were eligible and included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. There was perfect agreement in study selection between the reviewers (К statistic, 0.86; p < 0.001). Meta-analysis showed a 1.227 mmHg reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (95% CI: -6.61,4.16, p = 0.655), 2.997 mmHg reduction in long-term SBP (95% CI: -8.00,2.00, p = 0.241), 1.830 mmHg reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (95% CI: -5.06,1.40, p = 0.268), and 2.857 mmHg reduction in long-term DBP (95% CI: -6.01, 0.30, p = 0.076) after Mentha consumption in intervention group compared to control. In sub-group analysis, a statistically and clinically significant reduction in SBP and DBP was observed in the participants with ages above 30 years and in the participants with SBP > 130 mmHg or DBP > 80 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings showed that Mentha consumption might not have a statistically significant effect on lowering SBP, DBP, long-term SBP, and long-term DBP. However, it can lead to a clinically significant reduction in both long-term SBP and long-term DBP. Besides, Mentha may have potential benefits for patients with pre-hypertension and hypertension. Nevertheless, further well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm our results. PROSPERO Registration No: CRD42023459490.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587584/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04701-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04701-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:食用薄荷可能与人类血压的改善有关,但最近的随机对照试验(RCTs)证据显示结果并不一致。本研究对有关薄荷对血压影响的随机对照试验进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析:为了涵盖所有相关文献,我们在 2024 年 3 月之前根据 PRISMA 指南对 PubMed、ISI Web of Science 和 SCOPUS 数据库进行了全面检索。此外,还为此检索了谷歌学术、SID 数据库、相关综述的参考文献目录和荟萃分析。此外,还进行了 "滚雪球式搜索",以纳入可能遗漏的其他相关试验。定量数据综合采用了随机效应模型,包括加权平均差(WMD)和 95% 置信区间(CI)。采用标准方法评估作者之间的卡帕统计、GRADE证据概况、异质性、元回归、敏感性分析和发表偏倚:在已确定的 476 篇出版物中,有 7 篇研究性临床试验符合条件并被纳入本次系统综述和荟萃分析。审稿人之间的研究选择完全一致(К统计量,0.86;P 130 mmHg 或 DBP > 80 mmHg):我们的研究结果表明,服用薄荷糖对降低SBP、DBP、长期SBP和长期DBP可能没有统计学意义。然而,它能使长期 SBP 和长期 DBP 有明显的临床降低效果。此外,薄荷可能对高血压前期和高血压患者有潜在的益处。尽管如此,我们仍需要进一步设计完善的 RCT 研究来证实我们的结果。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023459490。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Mentha on blood pressure: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Mentha consumption may associated with blood pressure improvement in humans, but the recent evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed inconsistent results. The present study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to investigate the effect of Mentha on blood pressure.

Methods: To cover all relevant literature, a complete search was conducted across PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases before March 2024 using PRISMA guidelines. In addition, Google Scholar, SID databases, the reference lists of the related reviews, and meta-analyses were searched for this purpose. Also, a "snowball search" was applied to include other relevant trials that may have been missed. A random-effects model was used for quantitative data synthesis, with weight mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Standard methodologies were utilized to assess kappa statistics between the authors, GRADE evidence profiles, heterogeneity, meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias.

Results: Out of 476 publications identified, seven RCTs were eligible and included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. There was perfect agreement in study selection between the reviewers (К statistic, 0.86; p < 0.001). Meta-analysis showed a 1.227 mmHg reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (95% CI: -6.61,4.16, p = 0.655), 2.997 mmHg reduction in long-term SBP (95% CI: -8.00,2.00, p = 0.241), 1.830 mmHg reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (95% CI: -5.06,1.40, p = 0.268), and 2.857 mmHg reduction in long-term DBP (95% CI: -6.01, 0.30, p = 0.076) after Mentha consumption in intervention group compared to control. In sub-group analysis, a statistically and clinically significant reduction in SBP and DBP was observed in the participants with ages above 30 years and in the participants with SBP > 130 mmHg or DBP > 80 mmHg.

Conclusions: Our findings showed that Mentha consumption might not have a statistically significant effect on lowering SBP, DBP, long-term SBP, and long-term DBP. However, it can lead to a clinically significant reduction in both long-term SBP and long-term DBP. Besides, Mentha may have potential benefits for patients with pre-hypertension and hypertension. Nevertheless, further well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm our results. PROSPERO Registration No: CRD42023459490.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
300
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信