多发性骨髓瘤患者人群匹配样本中不同种族结果的比较。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Breanna B Greteman, Michael H Tomasson, Amanda R Kahl, Madison M Wahlen, Melissa L Bates, Christopher Strouse, Mary E Charlton
{"title":"多发性骨髓瘤患者人群匹配样本中不同种族结果的比较。","authors":"Breanna B Greteman, Michael H Tomasson, Amanda R Kahl, Madison M Wahlen, Melissa L Bates, Christopher Strouse, Mary E Charlton","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01938-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>It is important to understand racial inequities in multiple myeloma treatment and survival, particularly in the Midwest where clear differences exist in cancer incidence and mortality. Since age and geographic location can greatly impact treatment and prognosis, matching patients on these characteristics can help identify reasons for outcome differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from the Iowa Cancer Registry's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were analyzed for adult patients diagnosed with first primary MM between 1/1/2010-12/31/2019. Matching procedures matched up to 4 White patients with each Black patient on age and city of residence. Demographic characteristics were compared, and Cox proportional hazards models were built to compare survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,845 patients in our overall sample, of which 85 were Black and 1,760 were White. There were 321 patients (74 Black, 247 White) that were matched. Black patients in the overall sample had decreased hazard for MM-specific death compared to White (HR = 0.50, 95% CI (0.43, 0.78)) when controlling for covariates. The decrease in MM-specific death in black patients was not statistically significant compared to matched controls (HR = 0.72, 95% CI (0.41, 1.27)). Treatment differences were not observed for either sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that, despite large racial differences in MM incidence and mortality in Iowa, there are no survival differences when matched on age and city of residence. These data fail to detect large barriers to myeloma treatment in Iowa, and are useful for formulating potential screening and prevention strategies. Future research should also assess results in different geographic areas, investigate survival among older White patients in rural areas, and investigate other potential reasons for mortality differences between Black and White MM patients such as specific treatments received.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of outcomes by race among a population-based matched sample of multiple myeloma patients.\",\"authors\":\"Breanna B Greteman, Michael H Tomasson, Amanda R Kahl, Madison M Wahlen, Melissa L Bates, Christopher Strouse, Mary E Charlton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10552-024-01938-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>It is important to understand racial inequities in multiple myeloma treatment and survival, particularly in the Midwest where clear differences exist in cancer incidence and mortality. Since age and geographic location can greatly impact treatment and prognosis, matching patients on these characteristics can help identify reasons for outcome differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from the Iowa Cancer Registry's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were analyzed for adult patients diagnosed with first primary MM between 1/1/2010-12/31/2019. Matching procedures matched up to 4 White patients with each Black patient on age and city of residence. Demographic characteristics were compared, and Cox proportional hazards models were built to compare survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,845 patients in our overall sample, of which 85 were Black and 1,760 were White. There were 321 patients (74 Black, 247 White) that were matched. Black patients in the overall sample had decreased hazard for MM-specific death compared to White (HR = 0.50, 95% CI (0.43, 0.78)) when controlling for covariates. The decrease in MM-specific death in black patients was not statistically significant compared to matched controls (HR = 0.72, 95% CI (0.41, 1.27)). Treatment differences were not observed for either sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that, despite large racial differences in MM incidence and mortality in Iowa, there are no survival differences when matched on age and city of residence. These data fail to detect large barriers to myeloma treatment in Iowa, and are useful for formulating potential screening and prevention strategies. Future research should also assess results in different geographic areas, investigate survival among older White patients in rural areas, and investigate other potential reasons for mortality differences between Black and White MM patients such as specific treatments received.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01938-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01938-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解多发性骨髓瘤治疗和生存方面的种族不平等现象非常重要,尤其是在癌症发病率和死亡率存在明显差异的中西部地区。由于年龄和地理位置会对治疗和预后产生很大影响,因此将患者的这些特征进行匹配有助于找出结果差异的原因:方法:分析了爱荷华州癌症登记处的监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中的回顾性数据,这些数据针对的是 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间诊断为初诊 MM 的成年患者。匹配程序根据年龄和居住城市为每名黑人患者匹配了最多 4 名白人患者。比较了人口统计学特征,并建立了Cox比例危险模型来比较生存率:总样本中有 1,845 名患者,其中黑人 85 人,白人 1,760 人。有 321 名患者(74 名黑人,247 名白人)进行了配对。在控制协变量的情况下,总体样本中的黑人患者与白人患者相比,MM特异性死亡的风险降低(HR = 0.50,95% CI (0.43,0.78))。与匹配的对照组相比,黑人患者MM特异性死亡风险的降低在统计学上并不显著(HR = 0.72,95% CI (0.41,1.27))。两个样本均未观察到治疗差异:我们发现,尽管爱荷华州在 MM 发病率和死亡率方面存在巨大的种族差异,但在年龄和居住城市匹配的情况下,并不存在生存差异。这些数据未能发现爱荷华州骨髓瘤治疗的巨大障碍,但对制定潜在的筛查和预防策略很有帮助。未来的研究还应评估不同地理区域的结果,调查农村地区老年白人患者的存活率,并调查造成黑人和白人骨髓瘤患者死亡率差异的其他潜在原因,如接受的特定治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of outcomes by race among a population-based matched sample of multiple myeloma patients.

Purpose: It is important to understand racial inequities in multiple myeloma treatment and survival, particularly in the Midwest where clear differences exist in cancer incidence and mortality. Since age and geographic location can greatly impact treatment and prognosis, matching patients on these characteristics can help identify reasons for outcome differences.

Methods: Retrospective data from the Iowa Cancer Registry's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were analyzed for adult patients diagnosed with first primary MM between 1/1/2010-12/31/2019. Matching procedures matched up to 4 White patients with each Black patient on age and city of residence. Demographic characteristics were compared, and Cox proportional hazards models were built to compare survival.

Results: There were 1,845 patients in our overall sample, of which 85 were Black and 1,760 were White. There were 321 patients (74 Black, 247 White) that were matched. Black patients in the overall sample had decreased hazard for MM-specific death compared to White (HR = 0.50, 95% CI (0.43, 0.78)) when controlling for covariates. The decrease in MM-specific death in black patients was not statistically significant compared to matched controls (HR = 0.72, 95% CI (0.41, 1.27)). Treatment differences were not observed for either sample.

Conclusion: We found that, despite large racial differences in MM incidence and mortality in Iowa, there are no survival differences when matched on age and city of residence. These data fail to detect large barriers to myeloma treatment in Iowa, and are useful for formulating potential screening and prevention strategies. Future research should also assess results in different geographic areas, investigate survival among older White patients in rural areas, and investigate other potential reasons for mortality differences between Black and White MM patients such as specific treatments received.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
Cancer Causes & Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach. The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues. The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts. Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信