美国军队医疗保健受益人中提供者的建议、孕妇的预期和实际妊娠体重增加:随机对照试验的二次分析。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Erin Solomon, Abby McPhail, Zoran Bursac, Melissa A Little, G Wayne Talcott, Rebecca A Krukowski
{"title":"美国军队医疗保健受益人中提供者的建议、孕妇的预期和实际妊娠体重增加:随机对照试验的二次分析。","authors":"Erin Solomon, Abby McPhail, Zoran Bursac, Melissa A Little, G Wayne Talcott, Rebecca A Krukowski","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06987-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthy gestational weight gain (GWG) is associated with improved pregnancy and delivery outcomes. Previous literature shows provider advice and expectations regarding GWG significantly associated with GWG outcomes. In this study, we explore the influence of these factors on GWG in a military population in this secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants (N = 377) came from a completed randomized controlled trial focused on behavioral interventions for healthy GWG and/or postpartum weight loss among TRICARE beneficiaries. At baseline, participants filled out a 5-item questionnaire assessing provider advice and self-expectations for GWG. For the actual GWG primary outcome variable, we calculated the difference between the weight obtained in the first trimester and the weight obtained at 36 weeks of gestation. We used regression models to assess the predictive ability of expectations about GWG on actual GWG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with higher baseline BMIs were more likely to expect excessive GWG as defined by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM; Overweight: 46.3%, Obesity: 65.4%). Participants' expectations showed a significant association with actual GWG (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.29-3.41, p = 0.003). Most participants (64.7%) reported no provider advice about how much weight to gain during their pregnancy. Of those who did receive advice, 55.4% reported that it was within the NAM guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study documented infrequent provider advice about GWG in a large sample of TRICARE beneficiaries (i.e., both active duty and non-active duty individuals) and supported an association between self-expectations and later actual GWG. Future studies might test strategies to increase/improve provider advice regarding GWG and to aid pregnant individuals in shaping and achieving their GWG expectations.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The trial was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03057808) on February 20, 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provider advice, pregnant persons' expectations, and actual gestational weight gain among United States military health care beneficiaries: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Erin Solomon, Abby McPhail, Zoran Bursac, Melissa A Little, G Wayne Talcott, Rebecca A Krukowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-024-06987-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthy gestational weight gain (GWG) is associated with improved pregnancy and delivery outcomes. Previous literature shows provider advice and expectations regarding GWG significantly associated with GWG outcomes. In this study, we explore the influence of these factors on GWG in a military population in this secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants (N = 377) came from a completed randomized controlled trial focused on behavioral interventions for healthy GWG and/or postpartum weight loss among TRICARE beneficiaries. At baseline, participants filled out a 5-item questionnaire assessing provider advice and self-expectations for GWG. For the actual GWG primary outcome variable, we calculated the difference between the weight obtained in the first trimester and the weight obtained at 36 weeks of gestation. We used regression models to assess the predictive ability of expectations about GWG on actual GWG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with higher baseline BMIs were more likely to expect excessive GWG as defined by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM; Overweight: 46.3%, Obesity: 65.4%). Participants' expectations showed a significant association with actual GWG (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.29-3.41, p = 0.003). Most participants (64.7%) reported no provider advice about how much weight to gain during their pregnancy. Of those who did receive advice, 55.4% reported that it was within the NAM guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study documented infrequent provider advice about GWG in a large sample of TRICARE beneficiaries (i.e., both active duty and non-active duty individuals) and supported an association between self-expectations and later actual GWG. Future studies might test strategies to increase/improve provider advice regarding GWG and to aid pregnant individuals in shaping and achieving their GWG expectations.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The trial was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03057808) on February 20, 2017.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587572/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06987-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06987-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:健康的妊娠体重增加(GWG)与妊娠和分娩结局的改善有关。以往的文献显示,提供者对 GWG 的建议和期望与 GWG 结果有很大关系。在本研究中,我们对一项随机对照试验的数据进行了二次分析,探讨了这些因素对军人妊娠体重增加的影响:参与者(N = 377)来自一项已完成的随机对照试验,该试验重点关注对 TRICARE 受益人进行健康 GWG 和/或产后减肥的行为干预。在基线期,参与者填写了一份由 5 个项目组成的调查问卷,评估提供者对 GWG 的建议和自我期望。对于实际 GWG 的主要结果变量,我们计算了妊娠头三个月的体重与妊娠 36 周时的体重之间的差值。我们使用回归模型来评估对 GWG 的期望值对实际 GWG 的预测能力:结果:基线体重指数(BMI)较高的参试者更有可能预期体重超标,美国国家医学研究院(NAM;超重:46.3%;肥胖:65.4%)对此做出了定义。参与者的预期与实际 GWG 有显著关联(OR 2.1,95% CI 1.29-3.41,p = 0.003)。大多数参与者(64.7%)表示在怀孕期间体重增加多少的问题上没有得到过医疗服务提供者的建议。在接受过建议的参与者中,55.4% 的人表示建议符合 NAM 指南:该研究记录了在 TRICARE 受益人(即现役和非现役人员)的大样本中,医疗服务提供者很少提供有关 GWG 的建议,并支持自我期望与后来的实际 GWG 之间存在关联。未来的研究可能会测试各种策略,以增加/改进提供者有关 GWG 的建议,并帮助孕妇形成和实现其 GWG 预期:该试验于2017年2月20日在clinicaltrials.gov(NCT03057808)上进行了前瞻性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Provider advice, pregnant persons' expectations, and actual gestational weight gain among United States military health care beneficiaries: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Introduction: Healthy gestational weight gain (GWG) is associated with improved pregnancy and delivery outcomes. Previous literature shows provider advice and expectations regarding GWG significantly associated with GWG outcomes. In this study, we explore the influence of these factors on GWG in a military population in this secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial.

Materials and methods: Participants (N = 377) came from a completed randomized controlled trial focused on behavioral interventions for healthy GWG and/or postpartum weight loss among TRICARE beneficiaries. At baseline, participants filled out a 5-item questionnaire assessing provider advice and self-expectations for GWG. For the actual GWG primary outcome variable, we calculated the difference between the weight obtained in the first trimester and the weight obtained at 36 weeks of gestation. We used regression models to assess the predictive ability of expectations about GWG on actual GWG.

Results: Participants with higher baseline BMIs were more likely to expect excessive GWG as defined by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM; Overweight: 46.3%, Obesity: 65.4%). Participants' expectations showed a significant association with actual GWG (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.29-3.41, p = 0.003). Most participants (64.7%) reported no provider advice about how much weight to gain during their pregnancy. Of those who did receive advice, 55.4% reported that it was within the NAM guidelines.

Conclusions: The study documented infrequent provider advice about GWG in a large sample of TRICARE beneficiaries (i.e., both active duty and non-active duty individuals) and supported an association between self-expectations and later actual GWG. Future studies might test strategies to increase/improve provider advice regarding GWG and to aid pregnant individuals in shaping and achieving their GWG expectations.

Clinical trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03057808) on February 20, 2017.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信