为未参保的乳腺癌患者提供多学科治疗的创新方法。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Jesse N Nodora, Jacqueline A Gilbert, Maria Elena Martinez, Waqas Arslan, Trevin Reyes, John A Dover, Gilbert M Ramos, Ian G Komenaka, Hebert D Hitchon, Ian K Komenaka
{"title":"为未参保的乳腺癌患者提供多学科治疗的创新方法。","authors":"Jesse N Nodora, Jacqueline A Gilbert, Maria Elena Martinez, Waqas Arslan, Trevin Reyes, John A Dover, Gilbert M Ramos, Ian G Komenaka, Hebert D Hitchon, Ian K Komenaka","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01935-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A significant proportion of many populations remain uninsured. The aim of the study was to assess differences in breast cancer outcomes before and after the implementation of an innovative approach to the multidisciplinary treatment of uninsured breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review was performed of patients seen at a safety net hospital from January 2000 to December 2020. Beginning July 2006, an innovative approach was implemented to lower patient costs and facilitate care of uninsured patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1,797 patients, 661 patients before the changes (BCS), and 1136 patients after implementation of the new cost saving approach (ACS). The mean age was 53 years. The majority were uninsured (56%) or insured by Medicaid (31%). Only 18% underwent screening mammography. The ACS group had a higher rate of breast conservation (75% vs 47%, p < 0.001). A higher percentage of the ACS group received adjuvant therapy: Chemotherapy (91% vs 70%, p < 0.001), Radiation therapy (91% vs 70%, p < 0.001), and initiated endocrine therapy (87% vs 67%, p < 0.001). After follow-up of 8 years, these changes resulted in lower ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (2% vs 16%, p < 0.001) and chest wall recurrence (5% versus 8%) and improvement in overall survival (90% vs 81%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peer-reviewed literature is replete of studies documenting disparities in breast cancer treatment. The current study describes a successful cost-limiting method which takes advantage of existing financial assistance programs to improve care in uninsured patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An innovative approach to the multidisciplinary treatment of uninsured breast cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Jesse N Nodora, Jacqueline A Gilbert, Maria Elena Martinez, Waqas Arslan, Trevin Reyes, John A Dover, Gilbert M Ramos, Ian G Komenaka, Hebert D Hitchon, Ian K Komenaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10552-024-01935-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A significant proportion of many populations remain uninsured. The aim of the study was to assess differences in breast cancer outcomes before and after the implementation of an innovative approach to the multidisciplinary treatment of uninsured breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review was performed of patients seen at a safety net hospital from January 2000 to December 2020. Beginning July 2006, an innovative approach was implemented to lower patient costs and facilitate care of uninsured patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1,797 patients, 661 patients before the changes (BCS), and 1136 patients after implementation of the new cost saving approach (ACS). The mean age was 53 years. The majority were uninsured (56%) or insured by Medicaid (31%). Only 18% underwent screening mammography. The ACS group had a higher rate of breast conservation (75% vs 47%, p < 0.001). A higher percentage of the ACS group received adjuvant therapy: Chemotherapy (91% vs 70%, p < 0.001), Radiation therapy (91% vs 70%, p < 0.001), and initiated endocrine therapy (87% vs 67%, p < 0.001). After follow-up of 8 years, these changes resulted in lower ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (2% vs 16%, p < 0.001) and chest wall recurrence (5% versus 8%) and improvement in overall survival (90% vs 81%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peer-reviewed literature is replete of studies documenting disparities in breast cancer treatment. The current study describes a successful cost-limiting method which takes advantage of existing financial assistance programs to improve care in uninsured patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01935-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01935-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在许多人群中,仍有很大一部分人没有参保。本研究旨在评估对未参保乳腺癌患者实施多学科治疗创新方法前后乳腺癌治疗效果的差异:方法:对 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在一家安全网医院就诊的患者进行回顾性审查。自 2006 年 7 月起,该医院开始实施一种创新方法,以降低患者费用并促进对未参保患者的治疗:研究对象包括 1797 名患者,其中 661 名患者在改革前(BCS),1136 名患者在实施新的成本节约方法后(ACS)。平均年龄为 53 岁。大多数人没有保险(56%)或有医疗补助保险(31%)。只有 18% 的人接受了乳房 X 光筛查。ACS 组保留乳房的比例更高(75% 对 47%,P 结论:ACS 组保留乳房的比例更高,P 结论:ACS 组保留乳房的比例更高:同行评议的文献中不乏记录乳腺癌治疗差异的研究。本研究介绍了一种成功的成本限制方法,该方法利用现有的经济援助计划来改善未参保患者的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An innovative approach to the multidisciplinary treatment of uninsured breast cancer patients.

Purpose: A significant proportion of many populations remain uninsured. The aim of the study was to assess differences in breast cancer outcomes before and after the implementation of an innovative approach to the multidisciplinary treatment of uninsured breast cancer patients.

Methods: Retrospective review was performed of patients seen at a safety net hospital from January 2000 to December 2020. Beginning July 2006, an innovative approach was implemented to lower patient costs and facilitate care of uninsured patients.

Results: The study included 1,797 patients, 661 patients before the changes (BCS), and 1136 patients after implementation of the new cost saving approach (ACS). The mean age was 53 years. The majority were uninsured (56%) or insured by Medicaid (31%). Only 18% underwent screening mammography. The ACS group had a higher rate of breast conservation (75% vs 47%, p < 0.001). A higher percentage of the ACS group received adjuvant therapy: Chemotherapy (91% vs 70%, p < 0.001), Radiation therapy (91% vs 70%, p < 0.001), and initiated endocrine therapy (87% vs 67%, p < 0.001). After follow-up of 8 years, these changes resulted in lower ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (2% vs 16%, p < 0.001) and chest wall recurrence (5% versus 8%) and improvement in overall survival (90% vs 81%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Peer-reviewed literature is replete of studies documenting disparities in breast cancer treatment. The current study describes a successful cost-limiting method which takes advantage of existing financial assistance programs to improve care in uninsured patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
Cancer Causes & Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach. The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues. The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts. Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信