Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Asfand Yar Cheema, Daniyal Shahid, Bibi Maryam, Debduti Mukhopadhyay, Mishaal Munir, Ali Najam, Hossam M Ali, Qaiser Bashir, Faiz Anwer
{"title":"异基因造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤的历史展望。","authors":"Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Asfand Yar Cheema, Daniyal Shahid, Bibi Maryam, Debduti Mukhopadhyay, Mishaal Munir, Ali Najam, Hossam M Ali, Qaiser Bashir, Faiz Anwer","doi":"10.1159/000542704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in novel therapies have improved outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM) patients and the use of allo-SCT has decreased. Current guidelines no longer support allo-SCT as consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed MM, even in high-risk cases.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Allo-SCT is now typically considered only within clinical trials for young, high-risk patients with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). It has not proven favorable despite its historical use. CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies have shown promise in treating triple- and penta-exposed/refractory MM, yet relapse remains common with poor survival rates. The efficacy of allo-SCT following BCMA-directed therapy and other new T-cell-directed therapies is unclear. Allo-SCT might be a viable option for eligible patients who relapse after these therapies, or where such options are unavailable. Advancements in reduced-intensity conditioning regimens have led to lower toxicity and transplant-related (TR) morbidity, lower graft versus host disease (GVHD) and TR mortality. Expanded use of alternative donors, like haploidentical donors, has yielded comparable outcomes. Better post-transplant GVHD regimens and maintenance strategies to prevent relapse have been developed.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>This review analyzes available literature to better understand the safety, efficacy, and current role of allo-SCT in managing MM. Newer regimens are needed as routine use of allo-SCT cannot be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":6981,"journal":{"name":"Acta Haematologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical Perspective of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Faisal Aslam, Asfand Yar Cheema, Daniyal Shahid, Bibi Maryam, Debduti Mukhopadhyay, Mishaal Munir, Ali Najam, Hossam M Ali, Qaiser Bashir, Faiz Anwer\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in novel therapies have improved outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM) patients and the use of allo-SCT has decreased. Current guidelines no longer support allo-SCT as consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed MM, even in high-risk cases.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Allo-SCT is now typically considered only within clinical trials for young, high-risk patients with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). It has not proven favorable despite its historical use. CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies have shown promise in treating triple- and penta-exposed/refractory MM, yet relapse remains common with poor survival rates. The efficacy of allo-SCT following BCMA-directed therapy and other new T-cell-directed therapies is unclear. Allo-SCT might be a viable option for eligible patients who relapse after these therapies, or where such options are unavailable. Advancements in reduced-intensity conditioning regimens have led to lower toxicity and transplant-related (TR) morbidity, lower graft versus host disease (GVHD) and TR mortality. Expanded use of alternative donors, like haploidentical donors, has yielded comparable outcomes. Better post-transplant GVHD regimens and maintenance strategies to prevent relapse have been developed.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>This review analyzes available literature to better understand the safety, efficacy, and current role of allo-SCT in managing MM. Newer regimens are needed as routine use of allo-SCT cannot be recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Haematologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Haematologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542704\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542704","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:新型疗法的进步改善了多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的预后,异体干细胞移植的使用也随之减少。目前的指南不再支持将同种异体移植作为新诊断 MM 的巩固疗法,即使是高风险病例也是如此。摘要:目前,同种异体移植通常只在临床试验中被考虑用于年轻、高风险的复发或难治性 MM(RRMM)患者。尽管历史上曾使用过异体干细胞移植,但事实证明这种疗法并不理想。CAR T 细胞疗法和双特异性抗体在治疗三重和五重暴露/难治性 MM 方面已显示出前景,但复发仍然常见,生存率也很低。在 BCMA 导向疗法和其他新的 T 细胞导向疗法之后进行异体 SCT 的疗效尚不明确。对于接受这些疗法后复发或无法接受这些疗法的符合条件的患者来说,异体造血干细胞移植可能是一种可行的选择。降低强度调理方案的进步降低了毒性和移植相关(TR)发病率,降低了移植物抗宿主疾病(GVHD)和TR死亡率。扩大使用替代供体(如单倍体供体)也取得了类似的效果。目前已开发出更好的移植后GVHD治疗方案和预防复发的维持策略:本综述分析了现有文献,以更好地了解异体造血干细胞移植的安全性、有效性和目前在治疗 MM 中的作用。由于不能推荐常规使用异体干细胞移植,因此需要更新的治疗方案。
Historical Perspective of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma.
Background: Advances in novel therapies have improved outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM) patients and the use of allo-SCT has decreased. Current guidelines no longer support allo-SCT as consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed MM, even in high-risk cases.
Summary: Allo-SCT is now typically considered only within clinical trials for young, high-risk patients with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). It has not proven favorable despite its historical use. CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies have shown promise in treating triple- and penta-exposed/refractory MM, yet relapse remains common with poor survival rates. The efficacy of allo-SCT following BCMA-directed therapy and other new T-cell-directed therapies is unclear. Allo-SCT might be a viable option for eligible patients who relapse after these therapies, or where such options are unavailable. Advancements in reduced-intensity conditioning regimens have led to lower toxicity and transplant-related (TR) morbidity, lower graft versus host disease (GVHD) and TR mortality. Expanded use of alternative donors, like haploidentical donors, has yielded comparable outcomes. Better post-transplant GVHD regimens and maintenance strategies to prevent relapse have been developed.
Key messages: This review analyzes available literature to better understand the safety, efficacy, and current role of allo-SCT in managing MM. Newer regimens are needed as routine use of allo-SCT cannot be recommended.
期刊介绍:
''Acta Haematologica'' is a well-established and internationally recognized clinically-oriented journal featuring balanced, wide-ranging coverage of current hematology research. A wealth of information on such problems as anemia, leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, hereditary disorders, blood coagulation, growth factors, hematopoiesis and differentiation is contained in first-rate basic and clinical papers some of which are accompanied by editorial comments by eminent experts. These are supplemented by short state-of-the-art communications, reviews and correspondence as well as occasional special issues devoted to ‘hot topics’ in hematology. These will keep the practicing hematologist well informed of the new developments in the field.