在人类与野生动物冲突地区,通过人与人之间的联系建立共存关系

IF 5.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Aalayna R. Green, Stotra Chakrabarti, Shweta Shivakumar, Courtney Hughes, Sayan Banerjee, Maureen W. Kinyanjui, Moreangels M. Mbizah, Omar Ohrens, Abigail R. Thiemkey
{"title":"在人类与野生动物冲突地区,通过人与人之间的联系建立共存关系","authors":"Aalayna R. Green,&nbsp;Stotra Chakrabarti,&nbsp;Shweta Shivakumar,&nbsp;Courtney Hughes,&nbsp;Sayan Banerjee,&nbsp;Maureen W. Kinyanjui,&nbsp;Moreangels M. Mbizah,&nbsp;Omar Ohrens,&nbsp;Abigail R. Thiemkey","doi":"10.1111/cobi.14402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is a critical challenge to human development and well-being and threatens biodiversity conservation. Ideally, HWC mitigation should benefit both wildlife and communities and limit the costs associated with living alongside wildlife. However, place- and context-dependent realizations of conflict are often overlooked in HWC mitigation. Social and systemic dimensions of human–wildlife relationships often receive limited consideration in HWC as a concept and in mitigation strategies implemented globally. In recognizing our collective symmetries as a diverse group of researchers, we pose the idea of constellations of coexistence, based on Atallah et al.’s “constellation of co-resistance.” Building on literature and our interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral experiences of working with diverse species inhabiting different sociocultural, sociopolitical, and socioeconomic landscapes, we considered evidence of cultural nuances (e.g., sociocultural dimensions of human–elephant and human–lion interactions in East Africa and India) in HWC mitigation and argue that failing to incorporate them in mainstream practices poses a myriad of ethical and practical consequences. Locally situated but globally relevant, participation of local and Indigenous communities in HWC mitigation activities produces better conservation outcomes. Centering communities in the ideation, implementation, and evaluation of HWC mitigation promotes more equitable and sustainable management strategies for long-term human–wildlife coexistence.</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cobi.14402","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating constellations of coexistence through connections between people in human–wildlife conflict areas\",\"authors\":\"Aalayna R. Green,&nbsp;Stotra Chakrabarti,&nbsp;Shweta Shivakumar,&nbsp;Courtney Hughes,&nbsp;Sayan Banerjee,&nbsp;Maureen W. Kinyanjui,&nbsp;Moreangels M. Mbizah,&nbsp;Omar Ohrens,&nbsp;Abigail R. Thiemkey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cobi.14402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is a critical challenge to human development and well-being and threatens biodiversity conservation. Ideally, HWC mitigation should benefit both wildlife and communities and limit the costs associated with living alongside wildlife. However, place- and context-dependent realizations of conflict are often overlooked in HWC mitigation. Social and systemic dimensions of human–wildlife relationships often receive limited consideration in HWC as a concept and in mitigation strategies implemented globally. In recognizing our collective symmetries as a diverse group of researchers, we pose the idea of constellations of coexistence, based on Atallah et al.’s “constellation of co-resistance.” Building on literature and our interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral experiences of working with diverse species inhabiting different sociocultural, sociopolitical, and socioeconomic landscapes, we considered evidence of cultural nuances (e.g., sociocultural dimensions of human–elephant and human–lion interactions in East Africa and India) in HWC mitigation and argue that failing to incorporate them in mainstream practices poses a myriad of ethical and practical consequences. Locally situated but globally relevant, participation of local and Indigenous communities in HWC mitigation activities produces better conservation outcomes. Centering communities in the ideation, implementation, and evaluation of HWC mitigation promotes more equitable and sustainable management strategies for long-term human–wildlife coexistence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cobi.14402\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.14402\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.14402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类与野生动物冲突(HWC)是对人类发展和福祉的严峻挑战,也威胁着生物多样性的保护。理想情况下,缓解人与野生动物冲突的措施应同时惠及野生动物和社区,并限制与野生动物共处的相关成本。然而,在缓解 HWC 的过程中,往往忽略了因地制宜的冲突现实。人类与野生动物关系的社会和系统维度在 HWC 这一概念和全球实施的缓解战略中得到的考虑往往有限。认识到我们作为一个多元化研究群体的集体对称性,我们在阿塔拉等人提出的 "共抗星座 "的基础上,提出了共存星座的概念。根据文献以及我们与居住在不同社会文化、社会政治和社会经济环境中的不同物种打交道的跨学科和跨部门经验,我们考虑了在减少 HWC 方面文化细微差别的证据(例如,东非和印度的人象互动和人狮互动的社会文化层面),并认为如果不将其纳入主流实践,会带来无数伦理和实际后果。当地社区和土著社区参与减少 HWC 活动,既符合当地情况,又与全球相关,可取得更好的保护成果。以社区为中心来构思、实施和评估减少 HWC 的活动,可以促进更加公平和可持续的管理战略,实现人类与野生动物的长期共存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Creating constellations of coexistence through connections between people in human–wildlife conflict areas

Creating constellations of coexistence through connections between people in human–wildlife conflict areas

Human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is a critical challenge to human development and well-being and threatens biodiversity conservation. Ideally, HWC mitigation should benefit both wildlife and communities and limit the costs associated with living alongside wildlife. However, place- and context-dependent realizations of conflict are often overlooked in HWC mitigation. Social and systemic dimensions of human–wildlife relationships often receive limited consideration in HWC as a concept and in mitigation strategies implemented globally. In recognizing our collective symmetries as a diverse group of researchers, we pose the idea of constellations of coexistence, based on Atallah et al.’s “constellation of co-resistance.” Building on literature and our interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral experiences of working with diverse species inhabiting different sociocultural, sociopolitical, and socioeconomic landscapes, we considered evidence of cultural nuances (e.g., sociocultural dimensions of human–elephant and human–lion interactions in East Africa and India) in HWC mitigation and argue that failing to incorporate them in mainstream practices poses a myriad of ethical and practical consequences. Locally situated but globally relevant, participation of local and Indigenous communities in HWC mitigation activities produces better conservation outcomes. Centering communities in the ideation, implementation, and evaluation of HWC mitigation promotes more equitable and sustainable management strategies for long-term human–wildlife coexistence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信