Partha Kar:欢迎 Leng 对医生和麻醉师同事的审查--但要谨慎乐观

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2608
Partha Kar
{"title":"Partha Kar:欢迎 Leng 对医生和麻醉师同事的审查--但要谨慎乐观","authors":"Partha Kar","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finally, we’re here. After months of heated debates, social media uproar, royal colleges in turmoil, and the reputation of many national organisations being questioned, the worm has turned. The health and social care secretary, Wes Streeting, has called for a review of how physician and anaesthesia associates are deployed in the NHS.1 The chair of the review, Gillian Leng, has a strong reputation and is well placed to conduct it. Since the stipulation is to look at data and views neutrally and to reach a decision about whether these roles are a cost effective use of taxpayers’ money, the former chief of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence is as good as it gets. So, what next? One thing is to allow open communication from all parties and ensure that there’s a genuine desire to investigate this thoroughly. This issue won’t just go away. …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partha Kar: Leng’s review of physician and anaesthesia associates is welcome—with guarded optimism\",\"authors\":\"Partha Kar\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj.q2608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Finally, we’re here. After months of heated debates, social media uproar, royal colleges in turmoil, and the reputation of many national organisations being questioned, the worm has turned. The health and social care secretary, Wes Streeting, has called for a review of how physician and anaesthesia associates are deployed in the NHS.1 The chair of the review, Gillian Leng, has a strong reputation and is well placed to conduct it. Since the stipulation is to look at data and views neutrally and to reach a decision about whether these roles are a cost effective use of taxpayers’ money, the former chief of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence is as good as it gets. So, what next? One thing is to allow open communication from all parties and ensure that there’s a genuine desire to investigate this thoroughly. This issue won’t just go away. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":22388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The BMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

终于,我们到了。经过几个月的激烈辩论、社交媒体的骚动、皇家学院的动荡以及许多国家组织声誉的质疑,事情终于有了转机。卫生与社会关怀部部长韦斯-斯泰廷(Wes Streeting)呼吁对国民医疗服务体系中医生和麻醉助理的调配方式进行审查1。审查主席吉莉安-冷(Gillian Leng)声誉卓著,完全有能力开展这项工作。既然规定要中立地研究数据和观点,并就这些角色是否符合纳税人的成本效益做出决定,那么国家健康与护理卓越研究所的前所长就再合适不过了。那么,下一步该怎么办?一是允许各方进行公开交流,确保各方都有彻底调查此事的真诚愿望。这个问题不会就此消失。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Partha Kar: Leng’s review of physician and anaesthesia associates is welcome—with guarded optimism
Finally, we’re here. After months of heated debates, social media uproar, royal colleges in turmoil, and the reputation of many national organisations being questioned, the worm has turned. The health and social care secretary, Wes Streeting, has called for a review of how physician and anaesthesia associates are deployed in the NHS.1 The chair of the review, Gillian Leng, has a strong reputation and is well placed to conduct it. Since the stipulation is to look at data and views neutrally and to reach a decision about whether these roles are a cost effective use of taxpayers’ money, the former chief of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence is as good as it gets. So, what next? One thing is to allow open communication from all parties and ensure that there’s a genuine desire to investigate this thoroughly. This issue won’t just go away. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信