在干燥的土壤中种植草和禁草混合物--根系没有显示出空间生态位互补性

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Palash Mandal, Jochem B. Evers, Peter E.L van der Putten, Tjeerd Jan Stomph
{"title":"在干燥的土壤中种植草和禁草混合物--根系没有显示出空间生态位互补性","authors":"Palash Mandal, Jochem B. Evers, Peter E.L van der Putten, Tjeerd Jan Stomph","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07096-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aim</h3><p>Differences in root system architecture of species grown in mixtures may contribute to overyielding through spatial niche complementarity, depending on soil conditions. We investigated if differences in root system architecture in a grass-forb combination under drying soil conditions contributed to complementarity in root distribution.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Bristle oat (<i>Avena strigosa</i> Schreb.) and fodder radish (<i>Raphanus sativus</i> L.) were grown in containers (35 cm soil depth) in a greenhouse as sole stands and alternate row mixtures with continuous rewetting or in drying soil profiles. Drying soils reached 7.5 and 9.5% cm<sup>3</sup>/cm<sup>3</sup> moisture at 0–10 and 10–20 cm depth respectively. Aboveground biomass and root system traits were quantified.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Mixtures produced 60 and 34% more root length and 11 and 24% higher biomass than sole stands in moist and drying soil respectively. In drying soil bristle oat and fodder radish had respectively 58% and 13% higher root length density in mixtures than in sole stands, whereas fodder radish dominated the aboveground biomass. In drying soil, sole-growing bristle oat produced more root length in the bottom layer than in other layers, while sole-growing fodder radish produced more root length in the upper layer. In mixtures both species produced more root length in the upper layer.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Both species over-yielded when grown as a mixture either in moist or drying topsoil; however, they did not exhibit complementary root distribution. Contrary to the expected niche complementarity, plants of both species enhanced root placement in the top layer, whether dry or moist.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growing a grass and forb mixture in drying soil – root systems do not show spatial niche complementarity\",\"authors\":\"Palash Mandal, Jochem B. Evers, Peter E.L van der Putten, Tjeerd Jan Stomph\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-07096-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background and aim</h3><p>Differences in root system architecture of species grown in mixtures may contribute to overyielding through spatial niche complementarity, depending on soil conditions. We investigated if differences in root system architecture in a grass-forb combination under drying soil conditions contributed to complementarity in root distribution.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Bristle oat (<i>Avena strigosa</i> Schreb.) and fodder radish (<i>Raphanus sativus</i> L.) were grown in containers (35 cm soil depth) in a greenhouse as sole stands and alternate row mixtures with continuous rewetting or in drying soil profiles. Drying soils reached 7.5 and 9.5% cm<sup>3</sup>/cm<sup>3</sup> moisture at 0–10 and 10–20 cm depth respectively. Aboveground biomass and root system traits were quantified.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Mixtures produced 60 and 34% more root length and 11 and 24% higher biomass than sole stands in moist and drying soil respectively. In drying soil bristle oat and fodder radish had respectively 58% and 13% higher root length density in mixtures than in sole stands, whereas fodder radish dominated the aboveground biomass. In drying soil, sole-growing bristle oat produced more root length in the bottom layer than in other layers, while sole-growing fodder radish produced more root length in the upper layer. In mixtures both species produced more root length in the upper layer.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Both species over-yielded when grown as a mixture either in moist or drying topsoil; however, they did not exhibit complementary root distribution. Contrary to the expected niche complementarity, plants of both species enhanced root placement in the top layer, whether dry or moist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07096-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07096-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的根据土壤条件的不同,混播物种根系结构的差异可能会通过空间生态位互补性促进高产。我们研究了在干燥的土壤条件下,禾本科植物组合根系结构的差异是否会导致根系分布的互补性。方法在温室的容器中(35 厘米土深)种植脆燕麦(Avena strigosa Schreb.干燥土壤的 0-10 厘米和 10-20 厘米深度的水分分别达到 7.5% 和 9.5% cm3/cm3。结果 在潮湿土壤和干燥土壤中,混种植物的根长分别比单株植物多 60% 和 34%,生物量分别比单株植物多 11% 和 24%。在干燥土壤中,混合种植的刚毛燕麦和饲料萝卜的根长密度分别比单独种植的高出 58% 和 13%,而地上生物量则以饲料萝卜为主。在干燥土壤中,单独生长的刚毛燕麦在底层产生的根长多于其他层,而单独生长的饲料萝卜在上层产生的根长多于其他层。结论这两个物种在潮湿或干燥的表层土壤中混合种植时都能获得超产,但它们的根系分布并不互补。与预期的生态位互补性相反,无论是干燥还是潮湿的表层,两种植物的根系都更多地分布在表层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Growing a grass and forb mixture in drying soil – root systems do not show spatial niche complementarity

Background and aim

Differences in root system architecture of species grown in mixtures may contribute to overyielding through spatial niche complementarity, depending on soil conditions. We investigated if differences in root system architecture in a grass-forb combination under drying soil conditions contributed to complementarity in root distribution.

Methods

Bristle oat (Avena strigosa Schreb.) and fodder radish (Raphanus sativus L.) were grown in containers (35 cm soil depth) in a greenhouse as sole stands and alternate row mixtures with continuous rewetting or in drying soil profiles. Drying soils reached 7.5 and 9.5% cm3/cm3 moisture at 0–10 and 10–20 cm depth respectively. Aboveground biomass and root system traits were quantified.

Results

Mixtures produced 60 and 34% more root length and 11 and 24% higher biomass than sole stands in moist and drying soil respectively. In drying soil bristle oat and fodder radish had respectively 58% and 13% higher root length density in mixtures than in sole stands, whereas fodder radish dominated the aboveground biomass. In drying soil, sole-growing bristle oat produced more root length in the bottom layer than in other layers, while sole-growing fodder radish produced more root length in the upper layer. In mixtures both species produced more root length in the upper layer.

Conclusions

Both species over-yielded when grown as a mixture either in moist or drying topsoil; however, they did not exhibit complementary root distribution. Contrary to the expected niche complementarity, plants of both species enhanced root placement in the top layer, whether dry or moist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信