Palash Mandal, Jochem B. Evers, Peter E.L van der Putten, Tjeerd Jan Stomph
{"title":"在干燥的土壤中种植草和禁草混合物--根系没有显示出空间生态位互补性","authors":"Palash Mandal, Jochem B. Evers, Peter E.L van der Putten, Tjeerd Jan Stomph","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07096-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aim</h3><p>Differences in root system architecture of species grown in mixtures may contribute to overyielding through spatial niche complementarity, depending on soil conditions. We investigated if differences in root system architecture in a grass-forb combination under drying soil conditions contributed to complementarity in root distribution.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Bristle oat (<i>Avena strigosa</i> Schreb.) and fodder radish (<i>Raphanus sativus</i> L.) were grown in containers (35 cm soil depth) in a greenhouse as sole stands and alternate row mixtures with continuous rewetting or in drying soil profiles. Drying soils reached 7.5 and 9.5% cm<sup>3</sup>/cm<sup>3</sup> moisture at 0–10 and 10–20 cm depth respectively. Aboveground biomass and root system traits were quantified.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Mixtures produced 60 and 34% more root length and 11 and 24% higher biomass than sole stands in moist and drying soil respectively. In drying soil bristle oat and fodder radish had respectively 58% and 13% higher root length density in mixtures than in sole stands, whereas fodder radish dominated the aboveground biomass. In drying soil, sole-growing bristle oat produced more root length in the bottom layer than in other layers, while sole-growing fodder radish produced more root length in the upper layer. In mixtures both species produced more root length in the upper layer.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Both species over-yielded when grown as a mixture either in moist or drying topsoil; however, they did not exhibit complementary root distribution. Contrary to the expected niche complementarity, plants of both species enhanced root placement in the top layer, whether dry or moist.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growing a grass and forb mixture in drying soil – root systems do not show spatial niche complementarity\",\"authors\":\"Palash Mandal, Jochem B. Evers, Peter E.L van der Putten, Tjeerd Jan Stomph\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-07096-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background and aim</h3><p>Differences in root system architecture of species grown in mixtures may contribute to overyielding through spatial niche complementarity, depending on soil conditions. We investigated if differences in root system architecture in a grass-forb combination under drying soil conditions contributed to complementarity in root distribution.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Bristle oat (<i>Avena strigosa</i> Schreb.) and fodder radish (<i>Raphanus sativus</i> L.) were grown in containers (35 cm soil depth) in a greenhouse as sole stands and alternate row mixtures with continuous rewetting or in drying soil profiles. Drying soils reached 7.5 and 9.5% cm<sup>3</sup>/cm<sup>3</sup> moisture at 0–10 and 10–20 cm depth respectively. Aboveground biomass and root system traits were quantified.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Mixtures produced 60 and 34% more root length and 11 and 24% higher biomass than sole stands in moist and drying soil respectively. In drying soil bristle oat and fodder radish had respectively 58% and 13% higher root length density in mixtures than in sole stands, whereas fodder radish dominated the aboveground biomass. In drying soil, sole-growing bristle oat produced more root length in the bottom layer than in other layers, while sole-growing fodder radish produced more root length in the upper layer. In mixtures both species produced more root length in the upper layer.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Both species over-yielded when grown as a mixture either in moist or drying topsoil; however, they did not exhibit complementary root distribution. Contrary to the expected niche complementarity, plants of both species enhanced root placement in the top layer, whether dry or moist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07096-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07096-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Growing a grass and forb mixture in drying soil – root systems do not show spatial niche complementarity
Background and aim
Differences in root system architecture of species grown in mixtures may contribute to overyielding through spatial niche complementarity, depending on soil conditions. We investigated if differences in root system architecture in a grass-forb combination under drying soil conditions contributed to complementarity in root distribution.
Methods
Bristle oat (Avena strigosa Schreb.) and fodder radish (Raphanus sativus L.) were grown in containers (35 cm soil depth) in a greenhouse as sole stands and alternate row mixtures with continuous rewetting or in drying soil profiles. Drying soils reached 7.5 and 9.5% cm3/cm3 moisture at 0–10 and 10–20 cm depth respectively. Aboveground biomass and root system traits were quantified.
Results
Mixtures produced 60 and 34% more root length and 11 and 24% higher biomass than sole stands in moist and drying soil respectively. In drying soil bristle oat and fodder radish had respectively 58% and 13% higher root length density in mixtures than in sole stands, whereas fodder radish dominated the aboveground biomass. In drying soil, sole-growing bristle oat produced more root length in the bottom layer than in other layers, while sole-growing fodder radish produced more root length in the upper layer. In mixtures both species produced more root length in the upper layer.
Conclusions
Both species over-yielded when grown as a mixture either in moist or drying topsoil; however, they did not exhibit complementary root distribution. Contrary to the expected niche complementarity, plants of both species enhanced root placement in the top layer, whether dry or moist.
期刊介绍:
Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.