{"title":"光泵磁强计脑磁图的性能:大样本和多重任务的验证。","authors":"Xiongfei Wang, Pengfei Teng, Qiujian Meng, Yuying Jiang, Jiangfen Wu, Tianfu Li, Mengyang Wang, Yuguang Guan, Jian Zhou, Jingwei Sheng, Jia-Hong Gao, Guoming Luan","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ad9680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Current commercial magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems detect neuro-magnetic signals using superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs), which require liquid helium as cryogen and have many limitations during operation. In contrast, optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) technology provides a promising alternative to conventional SQUID-MEG. OPMs can operate at room temperature, offering benefits such as flexible deployment and lower costs. However, the validation of OPM-MEG has primarily been conducted on small sample sizes and specific regions of interest in the brain, lacking comprehensive validation for larger sample sizes and assessment of whole-brain.<i>Approach.</i>We recruited 100 participants, including healthy and neurological disorders individuals. Whole-brain OPM-MEG and SQUID-MEG data were recorded sequentially during auditory (<i>n</i>= 50) and visual (<i>n</i>= 50) stimulation experiments. By comparing the task-evoked responses of the two systems, we aimed to validate the performance of the next-generation OPM-MEG.<i>Main results.</i>The results showed that OPM-MEG enhanced the amplitude of task-related responses and exhibited similar magnetic field patterns and neural oscillatory activity as SQUID-MEG. There was no difference in the task-related latencies measured by the two systems. The signal-to-noise ratio was lower for the OPM-MEG in the auditory experiment, but did not differ in the visual experiment, suggesting that the results may be task-dependent.<i>Significance.</i>These results demonstrate that OPM-MEG, as an alternative to traditional SQUID-MEG, shows superior response amplitude and comparable performance in capturing brain dynamics. This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of OPM-MEG as a next-generation neuroimaging technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of optically pumped magnetometer magnetoencephalography: validation in large samples and multiple tasks.\",\"authors\":\"Xiongfei Wang, Pengfei Teng, Qiujian Meng, Yuying Jiang, Jiangfen Wu, Tianfu Li, Mengyang Wang, Yuguang Guan, Jian Zhou, Jingwei Sheng, Jia-Hong Gao, Guoming Luan\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1741-2552/ad9680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Current commercial magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems detect neuro-magnetic signals using superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs), which require liquid helium as cryogen and have many limitations during operation. In contrast, optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) technology provides a promising alternative to conventional SQUID-MEG. OPMs can operate at room temperature, offering benefits such as flexible deployment and lower costs. However, the validation of OPM-MEG has primarily been conducted on small sample sizes and specific regions of interest in the brain, lacking comprehensive validation for larger sample sizes and assessment of whole-brain.<i>Approach.</i>We recruited 100 participants, including healthy and neurological disorders individuals. Whole-brain OPM-MEG and SQUID-MEG data were recorded sequentially during auditory (<i>n</i>= 50) and visual (<i>n</i>= 50) stimulation experiments. By comparing the task-evoked responses of the two systems, we aimed to validate the performance of the next-generation OPM-MEG.<i>Main results.</i>The results showed that OPM-MEG enhanced the amplitude of task-related responses and exhibited similar magnetic field patterns and neural oscillatory activity as SQUID-MEG. There was no difference in the task-related latencies measured by the two systems. The signal-to-noise ratio was lower for the OPM-MEG in the auditory experiment, but did not differ in the visual experiment, suggesting that the results may be task-dependent.<i>Significance.</i>These results demonstrate that OPM-MEG, as an alternative to traditional SQUID-MEG, shows superior response amplitude and comparable performance in capturing brain dynamics. This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of OPM-MEG as a next-generation neuroimaging technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad9680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad9680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance of optically pumped magnetometer magnetoencephalography: validation in large samples and multiple tasks.
Objective.Current commercial magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems detect neuro-magnetic signals using superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs), which require liquid helium as cryogen and have many limitations during operation. In contrast, optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) technology provides a promising alternative to conventional SQUID-MEG. OPMs can operate at room temperature, offering benefits such as flexible deployment and lower costs. However, the validation of OPM-MEG has primarily been conducted on small sample sizes and specific regions of interest in the brain, lacking comprehensive validation for larger sample sizes and assessment of whole-brain.Approach.We recruited 100 participants, including healthy and neurological disorders individuals. Whole-brain OPM-MEG and SQUID-MEG data were recorded sequentially during auditory (n= 50) and visual (n= 50) stimulation experiments. By comparing the task-evoked responses of the two systems, we aimed to validate the performance of the next-generation OPM-MEG.Main results.The results showed that OPM-MEG enhanced the amplitude of task-related responses and exhibited similar magnetic field patterns and neural oscillatory activity as SQUID-MEG. There was no difference in the task-related latencies measured by the two systems. The signal-to-noise ratio was lower for the OPM-MEG in the auditory experiment, but did not differ in the visual experiment, suggesting that the results may be task-dependent.Significance.These results demonstrate that OPM-MEG, as an alternative to traditional SQUID-MEG, shows superior response amplitude and comparable performance in capturing brain dynamics. This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of OPM-MEG as a next-generation neuroimaging technique.