一项三臂临床研究,比较健康男性受试者体内地诺单抗生物仿制药 LY06006 与参考药物地诺单抗的药代动力学和药效学相似性。

Rainard Fuhr, Xuejiao Sun, Xi Wang, Ying Dong, Joe Tai, Ming Zhou, Changlin Dou
{"title":"一项三臂临床研究,比较健康男性受试者体内地诺单抗生物仿制药 LY06006 与参考药物地诺单抗的药代动力学和药效学相似性。","authors":"Rainard Fuhr, Xuejiao Sun, Xi Wang, Ying Dong, Joe Tai, Ming Zhou, Changlin Dou","doi":"10.1080/17425255.2024.2432673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity, comparable safety, and immunogenicity between LY06006, European Union-sourced denosumab (EU-DEN), and United States-sourced denosumab (US-DEN).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this double-blind, parallel-group, and single-dose study, 300 healthy male subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a 60 mg dose of either LY06006, EU-DEN, or US-DEN subcutaneously. This study lasted for 253 days. Primary PK endpoints included maximum serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>), and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>0-inf</sub>). Pharmacokinetic equivalence was concluded if the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric least squares mean ratio (GLSMR) of primary endpoints were within 80%-125%. Other PK parameters, PD parameters, safety, and immunogenicity assessments were also conducted during the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 90% CIs for ratios of GLSMR were within the predefined equivalence margin for AUC<sub>0-inf</sub> (89.0%-111.1%), AUC<sub>0-t</sub> (89.7%-111.3%), and C<sub>max</sub> (92.3%-106.7%). The PD parameters, safety, and immunogenicity of LY06006 were also comparable to US-DEN and EU-DEN.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LY06006 was highly similar to US-DEN and EU-DEN in terms of PK, PD, safety and immunogenicity in healthy male subjects.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT06095427.</p>","PeriodicalId":94005,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A three-arm clinical study to compare pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of the denosumab biosimilar LY06006 with reference denosumab in healthy male subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Rainard Fuhr, Xuejiao Sun, Xi Wang, Ying Dong, Joe Tai, Ming Zhou, Changlin Dou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425255.2024.2432673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity, comparable safety, and immunogenicity between LY06006, European Union-sourced denosumab (EU-DEN), and United States-sourced denosumab (US-DEN).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this double-blind, parallel-group, and single-dose study, 300 healthy male subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a 60 mg dose of either LY06006, EU-DEN, or US-DEN subcutaneously. This study lasted for 253 days. Primary PK endpoints included maximum serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>), and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>0-inf</sub>). Pharmacokinetic equivalence was concluded if the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric least squares mean ratio (GLSMR) of primary endpoints were within 80%-125%. Other PK parameters, PD parameters, safety, and immunogenicity assessments were also conducted during the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 90% CIs for ratios of GLSMR were within the predefined equivalence margin for AUC<sub>0-inf</sub> (89.0%-111.1%), AUC<sub>0-t</sub> (89.7%-111.3%), and C<sub>max</sub> (92.3%-106.7%). The PD parameters, safety, and immunogenicity of LY06006 were also comparable to US-DEN and EU-DEN.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LY06006 was highly similar to US-DEN and EU-DEN in terms of PK, PD, safety and immunogenicity in healthy male subjects.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT06095427.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2024.2432673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2024.2432673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估LY06006、欧盟来源的地诺单抗(EU-DEN)和美国来源的地诺单抗(US-DEN)之间的药代动力学(PK)、药效学(PD)相似性、可比安全性和免疫原性:在这项双盲、平行组和单剂量研究中,300 名健康男性受试者按 1:1:1 随机分配,分别皮下注射 60 毫克剂量的 LY06006、EU-DEN 或 US-DEN。这项研究持续了 253 天。主要的 PK 终点包括最大血清浓度(Cmax)、从零时到最后可定量浓度的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)(AUC0-t)和从零时到无穷大的 AUC(AUC0-inf)。如果主要终点的几何最小二乘法均值比 (GLSMR) 的双侧 90% 置信区间 (CI) 在 80%-125% 范围内,则得出药代动力学等效结论。研究期间还进行了其他 PK 参数、PD 参数、安全性和免疫原性评估:结果:AUC0-inf(89.0%-111.1%)、AUC0-t(89.7%-111.3%)和Cmax(92.3%-106.7%)的GLSMR比值的90% CI在预定的等效范围内。LY06006的PD参数、安全性和免疫原性也与US-DEN和EU-DEN相当:结论:在健康男性受试者中,LY06006与US-DEN和EU-DEN在PK、PD、安全性和免疫原性方面高度相似。临床试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov 识别码为NCT06095427。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A three-arm clinical study to compare pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of the denosumab biosimilar LY06006 with reference denosumab in healthy male subjects.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity, comparable safety, and immunogenicity between LY06006, European Union-sourced denosumab (EU-DEN), and United States-sourced denosumab (US-DEN).

Research design and methods: In this double-blind, parallel-group, and single-dose study, 300 healthy male subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a 60 mg dose of either LY06006, EU-DEN, or US-DEN subcutaneously. This study lasted for 253 days. Primary PK endpoints included maximum serum concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf). Pharmacokinetic equivalence was concluded if the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric least squares mean ratio (GLSMR) of primary endpoints were within 80%-125%. Other PK parameters, PD parameters, safety, and immunogenicity assessments were also conducted during the study.

Results: The 90% CIs for ratios of GLSMR were within the predefined equivalence margin for AUC0-inf (89.0%-111.1%), AUC0-t (89.7%-111.3%), and Cmax (92.3%-106.7%). The PD parameters, safety, and immunogenicity of LY06006 were also comparable to US-DEN and EU-DEN.

Conclusion: LY06006 was highly similar to US-DEN and EU-DEN in terms of PK, PD, safety and immunogenicity in healthy male subjects.

Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT06095427.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信