用于脊髓脑脊液渗漏修复模拟和评分的罗切斯特模型。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muhammad I Jalal, Gabrielle Santangelo, Joshua Samodal, Sandra Catanzaro, Taylor Furst, Rohin Singh, Herman Li, Sameer Jain, Aman Singh, Varun Puvanesarajah, Andrew Wensel, David A Paul, Jonathan J Stone
{"title":"用于脊髓脑脊液渗漏修复模拟和评分的罗切斯特模型。","authors":"Muhammad I Jalal, Gabrielle Santangelo, Joshua Samodal, Sandra Catanzaro, Taylor Furst, Rohin Singh, Herman Li, Sameer Jain, Aman Singh, Varun Puvanesarajah, Andrew Wensel, David A Paul, Jonathan J Stone","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Iatrogenic spinal durotomies occur at a rate of 1% to 17%. Surgical simulation for durotomy repair is needed to provide affordable, accessible, and validated practice. This study sought to design and validate a simple 3-dimensional printed model for spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair and to introduce the Rochester original objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) CSF leak (ROCL) repair criteria for assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A spinal model was designed to mimic a lumbar laminectomy with the L3-5 lamina removed and 3-dimensional printed using Vero polymers. The model was paired with a porcine collagen \"dura\" that was pressurized using IV saline and overlayed with gel-molded fascial, muscle, and skin layers with an opening. Participants were provided a training model with a 1.5-cm midline durotomy, surgical microinstrument set, microscope, and 6-0 prolene suture. The 25-point ROCL repair criteria were adapted from the original OSATS principles to assess proficiency in surgical repair by 2 blinded neurosurgeons not participating in the trials. Postsimulation survey data regarding model realism were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six residents and 4 attendings participated. Median operative time in minutes was 13 minutes among residents and 7 minutes among attendings. Moreover, the ROCL score was a median of 19/25 for attendings and 15/25 for residents. The suture angle was statistically more consistent among senior residents and attendings compared with junior residents. Participants agreed that the model was realistic (median 4/5), useful for improving the operative technique (median 5/5), and would increase comfort in spinal CSF leak repair procedures (median 5/5). Each reusable model had a cost of $19.99 if printed with polylactic acid and each replacement dura cost <3¢.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents an affordable, realistic, and educational spinal CSF leak repair model and introduces ROCL for assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rochester Model for Spinal CSF Leak Repair Simulation and Scoring.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad I Jalal, Gabrielle Santangelo, Joshua Samodal, Sandra Catanzaro, Taylor Furst, Rohin Singh, Herman Li, Sameer Jain, Aman Singh, Varun Puvanesarajah, Andrew Wensel, David A Paul, Jonathan J Stone\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Iatrogenic spinal durotomies occur at a rate of 1% to 17%. Surgical simulation for durotomy repair is needed to provide affordable, accessible, and validated practice. This study sought to design and validate a simple 3-dimensional printed model for spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair and to introduce the Rochester original objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) CSF leak (ROCL) repair criteria for assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A spinal model was designed to mimic a lumbar laminectomy with the L3-5 lamina removed and 3-dimensional printed using Vero polymers. The model was paired with a porcine collagen \\\"dura\\\" that was pressurized using IV saline and overlayed with gel-molded fascial, muscle, and skin layers with an opening. Participants were provided a training model with a 1.5-cm midline durotomy, surgical microinstrument set, microscope, and 6-0 prolene suture. The 25-point ROCL repair criteria were adapted from the original OSATS principles to assess proficiency in surgical repair by 2 blinded neurosurgeons not participating in the trials. Postsimulation survey data regarding model realism were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six residents and 4 attendings participated. Median operative time in minutes was 13 minutes among residents and 7 minutes among attendings. Moreover, the ROCL score was a median of 19/25 for attendings and 15/25 for residents. The suture angle was statistically more consistent among senior residents and attendings compared with junior residents. Participants agreed that the model was realistic (median 4/5), useful for improving the operative technique (median 5/5), and would increase comfort in spinal CSF leak repair procedures (median 5/5). Each reusable model had a cost of $19.99 if printed with polylactic acid and each replacement dura cost <3¢.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents an affordable, realistic, and educational spinal CSF leak repair model and introduces ROCL for assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001458\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:先天性脊柱硬膜切开术的发生率为 1%-17%。需要对脊髓硬膜切开修复进行手术模拟,以提供可负担、可获得和可验证的实践。本研究旨在设计和验证一个简单的三维打印脊柱脑脊液(CSF)漏修复模型,并引入罗切斯特独创的客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)CSF漏(ROCL)修复评估标准:方法:设计了一个脊柱模型,模拟腰椎椎板切除术,切除 L3-5 椎板,并使用 Vero 聚合物进行三维打印。该模型与猪胶原 "硬膜 "配对,"硬膜 "使用静脉注射生理盐水加压,并覆盖有凝胶模塑的筋膜、肌肉和皮肤层,带有开口。为参与者提供了一个带有 1.5 厘米中线硬膜切开术、手术显微器械套件、显微镜和 6-0 prolene 缝合线的训练模型。25 点 ROCL 修复标准改编自 OSATS 原始原则,由两名未参与试验的盲神经外科医生评估手术修复的熟练程度。此外,还收集了模拟后有关模型真实性的调查数据:6名住院医师和4名主治医师参加了试验。住院医师和主治医师的手术时间中位数分别为 13 分钟和 7 分钟。此外,主治医师的 ROCL 评分中位数为 19/25,住院医师为 15/25。与初级住院医师相比,资深住院医师和主治医师的缝合角度在统计学上更为一致。参与者一致认为该模型逼真(中位数为 4/5),有助于改进手术技术(中位数为 5/5),并能提高脊髓 CSF 漏修补术的舒适度(中位数为 5/5)。如果使用聚乳酸印刷,每个可重复使用的模型成本为 19.99 美元,每个更换硬脑膜的成本为 19.99 美元:本研究介绍了一种经济实惠、逼真且具有教育意义的脊髓 CSF 漏修复模型,并引入了 ROCL 进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Rochester Model for Spinal CSF Leak Repair Simulation and Scoring.

Background and objective: Iatrogenic spinal durotomies occur at a rate of 1% to 17%. Surgical simulation for durotomy repair is needed to provide affordable, accessible, and validated practice. This study sought to design and validate a simple 3-dimensional printed model for spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair and to introduce the Rochester original objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) CSF leak (ROCL) repair criteria for assessment.

Methods: A spinal model was designed to mimic a lumbar laminectomy with the L3-5 lamina removed and 3-dimensional printed using Vero polymers. The model was paired with a porcine collagen "dura" that was pressurized using IV saline and overlayed with gel-molded fascial, muscle, and skin layers with an opening. Participants were provided a training model with a 1.5-cm midline durotomy, surgical microinstrument set, microscope, and 6-0 prolene suture. The 25-point ROCL repair criteria were adapted from the original OSATS principles to assess proficiency in surgical repair by 2 blinded neurosurgeons not participating in the trials. Postsimulation survey data regarding model realism were collected.

Results: Six residents and 4 attendings participated. Median operative time in minutes was 13 minutes among residents and 7 minutes among attendings. Moreover, the ROCL score was a median of 19/25 for attendings and 15/25 for residents. The suture angle was statistically more consistent among senior residents and attendings compared with junior residents. Participants agreed that the model was realistic (median 4/5), useful for improving the operative technique (median 5/5), and would increase comfort in spinal CSF leak repair procedures (median 5/5). Each reusable model had a cost of $19.99 if printed with polylactic acid and each replacement dura cost <3¢.

Conclusion: This study presents an affordable, realistic, and educational spinal CSF leak repair model and introduces ROCL for assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operative Neurosurgery
Operative Neurosurgery Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
530
期刊介绍: Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信