未破裂和破裂脑动脉瘤的开放显微手术与血管内治疗。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jennifer E Kim, Risheng Xu, Christopher M Jackson, Justin M Caplan, L Fernando Gonzalez, Judy Huang, Rafael J Tamargo
{"title":"未破裂和破裂脑动脉瘤的开放显微手术与血管内治疗。","authors":"Jennifer E Kim, Risheng Xu, Christopher M Jackson, Justin M Caplan, L Fernando Gonzalez, Judy Huang, Rafael J Tamargo","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open microsurgical and endovascular techniques are the 2 primary strategies for treating intracranial aneurysms. Microsurgical clipping and adjuvant technical maneuvers are well-established techniques with a track record for high occlusion rates and durable repairs. Endovascular, endosaccular, and extrasaccular therapies are associated with lower peri-procedural morbidity but with generally higher rates of retreatment. We discuss key clinical and anatomic considerations in treatment decision-making and compare the risks and benefits of microsurgical vs endovascular treatment within each context.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Microsurgical Versus Endovascular Management of Unruptured and Ruptured Brain Aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer E Kim, Risheng Xu, Christopher M Jackson, Justin M Caplan, L Fernando Gonzalez, Judy Huang, Rafael J Tamargo\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Open microsurgical and endovascular techniques are the 2 primary strategies for treating intracranial aneurysms. Microsurgical clipping and adjuvant technical maneuvers are well-established techniques with a track record for high occlusion rates and durable repairs. Endovascular, endosaccular, and extrasaccular therapies are associated with lower peri-procedural morbidity but with generally higher rates of retreatment. We discuss key clinical and anatomic considerations in treatment decision-making and compare the risks and benefits of microsurgical vs endovascular treatment within each context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001448\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001448","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开放显微外科手术和血管内技术是治疗颅内动脉瘤的两种主要方法。显微外科剪切和辅助技术操作是成熟的技术,具有高闭塞率和持久修复的记录。血管内、肌内和肌外疗法的围手术期发病率较低,但再治疗率通常较高。我们将讨论治疗决策中的关键临床和解剖考虑因素,并比较显微外科治疗和血管内治疗在不同情况下的风险和益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open Microsurgical Versus Endovascular Management of Unruptured and Ruptured Brain Aneurysms.

Open microsurgical and endovascular techniques are the 2 primary strategies for treating intracranial aneurysms. Microsurgical clipping and adjuvant technical maneuvers are well-established techniques with a track record for high occlusion rates and durable repairs. Endovascular, endosaccular, and extrasaccular therapies are associated with lower peri-procedural morbidity but with generally higher rates of retreatment. We discuss key clinical and anatomic considerations in treatment decision-making and compare the risks and benefits of microsurgical vs endovascular treatment within each context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operative Neurosurgery
Operative Neurosurgery Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
530
期刊介绍: Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信