Harrison S Brown, Bryce Wall, Simon C Mears, Benjamin M Stronach, Eric R Siegel, Jeffrey B Stambough
{"title":"在假体周围股骨骨折的手术治疗中使用 1 毫米 Cerclage 缆索。","authors":"Harrison S Brown, Bryce Wall, Simon C Mears, Benjamin M Stronach, Eric R Siegel, Jeffrey B Stambough","doi":"10.1177/21514593241302655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>1 mm cerclage cables have been introduced that can be placed under plates and hold reduction of periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFx) around total hip arthroplasty (THA). Their utilization remains controversial due to the risk of nonunion secondary to periosteal stripping associated for their application. We compared surgical outcomes in patients with THA PPFFx treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and cables vs patients with PPFFx treated with ORIF without cables. We hypothesized that cable use would decrease hardware failure and nonunion rates.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 42 cases of PPFFx around THA performed from 2015 to 2021. Twenty-three PPFFx were treated with plate and 1 mm cerclage cables, and 19 PPFFx were treated with plate without cables. Primary surgical outcomes included hardware failure, nonunion, reoperation, and time to radiographic union.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in nonunion rates: 9% in the cerclage cable group vs 16% in the plate-only group (<i>P</i> = .64). The average time to union was 6.0 months among 17 observed unions in the cerclage cable group, vs 8.0 months among 15 observed unions in the plate-only group, but this failed to reach significance (<i>P</i> = .12). There was no statistical difference in overall complication rates (13% cerclage vs 16% plate) requiring reoperation (<i>P</i> = 1.0).</p><p><strong>Discussion & conclusion: </strong>The utilization of 1 mm cerclage cables to hold reduction of PPFFx provides an easy method to hold fixation with a low overall complication rate and no significant differences in nonunion rate or time to union when compared to cases performed without cables.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"15 ","pages":"21514593241302655"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of 1 mm Cerclage Cables in Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Harrison S Brown, Bryce Wall, Simon C Mears, Benjamin M Stronach, Eric R Siegel, Jeffrey B Stambough\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21514593241302655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>1 mm cerclage cables have been introduced that can be placed under plates and hold reduction of periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFx) around total hip arthroplasty (THA). Their utilization remains controversial due to the risk of nonunion secondary to periosteal stripping associated for their application. We compared surgical outcomes in patients with THA PPFFx treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and cables vs patients with PPFFx treated with ORIF without cables. We hypothesized that cable use would decrease hardware failure and nonunion rates.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 42 cases of PPFFx around THA performed from 2015 to 2021. Twenty-three PPFFx were treated with plate and 1 mm cerclage cables, and 19 PPFFx were treated with plate without cables. Primary surgical outcomes included hardware failure, nonunion, reoperation, and time to radiographic union.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in nonunion rates: 9% in the cerclage cable group vs 16% in the plate-only group (<i>P</i> = .64). The average time to union was 6.0 months among 17 observed unions in the cerclage cable group, vs 8.0 months among 15 observed unions in the plate-only group, but this failed to reach significance (<i>P</i> = .12). There was no statistical difference in overall complication rates (13% cerclage vs 16% plate) requiring reoperation (<i>P</i> = 1.0).</p><p><strong>Discussion & conclusion: </strong>The utilization of 1 mm cerclage cables to hold reduction of PPFFx provides an easy method to hold fixation with a low overall complication rate and no significant differences in nonunion rate or time to union when compared to cases performed without cables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"21514593241302655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585047/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593241302655\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593241302655","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of 1 mm Cerclage Cables in Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.
Introduction: 1 mm cerclage cables have been introduced that can be placed under plates and hold reduction of periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFx) around total hip arthroplasty (THA). Their utilization remains controversial due to the risk of nonunion secondary to periosteal stripping associated for their application. We compared surgical outcomes in patients with THA PPFFx treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and cables vs patients with PPFFx treated with ORIF without cables. We hypothesized that cable use would decrease hardware failure and nonunion rates.
Materials & methods: We retrospectively reviewed 42 cases of PPFFx around THA performed from 2015 to 2021. Twenty-three PPFFx were treated with plate and 1 mm cerclage cables, and 19 PPFFx were treated with plate without cables. Primary surgical outcomes included hardware failure, nonunion, reoperation, and time to radiographic union.
Results: There was no significant difference in nonunion rates: 9% in the cerclage cable group vs 16% in the plate-only group (P = .64). The average time to union was 6.0 months among 17 observed unions in the cerclage cable group, vs 8.0 months among 15 observed unions in the plate-only group, but this failed to reach significance (P = .12). There was no statistical difference in overall complication rates (13% cerclage vs 16% plate) requiring reoperation (P = 1.0).
Discussion & conclusion: The utilization of 1 mm cerclage cables to hold reduction of PPFFx provides an easy method to hold fixation with a low overall complication rate and no significant differences in nonunion rate or time to union when compared to cases performed without cables.
期刊介绍:
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).