护理专业学生对临床模拟的满意度:横断面观察研究。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Juan Antonio Jiménez-Álvarez, María Dolores Guerra-Martín, Álvaro Borrallo-Riego
{"title":"护理专业学生对临床模拟的满意度:横断面观察研究。","authors":"Juan Antonio Jiménez-Álvarez, María Dolores Guerra-Martín, Álvaro Borrallo-Riego","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical Simulation improves results in the students' learning tests and allows for preserving acquired knowledge for longer periods of time, promoting more significant learning. This study was conducted to analyze Nursing students' satisfaction with Clinical Simulation in three centres attached to a university from southern Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative, non-experimental and cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out. The students included were attending their third year of the Nursing undergraduate course and had already taken part in training sessions by means of Clinical Simulation. The Satisfaction Scale with High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation in Students (SSHF) was used for data collection. This scale has been validated and has 33 items grouped into eight factors. The SPSS software (version 28), was used for data analysis, establishing <i>p</i>-values < 0.05 for the statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants were 180 students, with a mean age of 22.17 years old. Of them, 90.56% belonged to the female gender. A mean score of 3.82 out of 5 was obtained in the SSHF items. The items that obtained the highest scores were the following: benefits of Clinical Simulation as it relates theory with practise; possibility of learning based on the mistakes made; and comfort and respect while the sessions were developed. The item that obtained the lowest score was \"timing for each simulation case\". We found significant differences in the results obtained according to each attached centre.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The students showed high satisfaction levels regarding High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation in each of the three attached centres included in the study. Nevertheless, they stated the need to invest more time in Clinical Simulation sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3178-3190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing Students' Satisfaction with Clinical Simulation: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Antonio Jiménez-Álvarez, María Dolores Guerra-Martín, Álvaro Borrallo-Riego\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep14040231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical Simulation improves results in the students' learning tests and allows for preserving acquired knowledge for longer periods of time, promoting more significant learning. This study was conducted to analyze Nursing students' satisfaction with Clinical Simulation in three centres attached to a university from southern Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative, non-experimental and cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out. The students included were attending their third year of the Nursing undergraduate course and had already taken part in training sessions by means of Clinical Simulation. The Satisfaction Scale with High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation in Students (SSHF) was used for data collection. This scale has been validated and has 33 items grouped into eight factors. The SPSS software (version 28), was used for data analysis, establishing <i>p</i>-values < 0.05 for the statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants were 180 students, with a mean age of 22.17 years old. Of them, 90.56% belonged to the female gender. A mean score of 3.82 out of 5 was obtained in the SSHF items. The items that obtained the highest scores were the following: benefits of Clinical Simulation as it relates theory with practise; possibility of learning based on the mistakes made; and comfort and respect while the sessions were developed. The item that obtained the lowest score was \\\"timing for each simulation case\\\". We found significant differences in the results obtained according to each attached centre.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The students showed high satisfaction levels regarding High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation in each of the three attached centres included in the study. Nevertheless, they stated the need to invest more time in Clinical Simulation sessions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"3178-3190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587440/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床模拟能提高学生学习测试的成绩,并能将所学知识保存更长时间,从而促进更有效的学习。本研究旨在分析西班牙南部一所大学下属的三个中心的护理专业学生对临床模拟的满意度:方法:进行了一项定量、非实验和横截面描述性研究。研究对象为护理专业本科三年级学生,他们已经参加过临床模拟培训课程。数据收集采用了学生高仿真临床模拟满意度量表(SSHF)。该量表已经过验证,共有 33 个项目,分为 8 个因子。数据分析采用 SPSS 软件(28 版),统计学差异的 P 值小于 0.05:参与者为 180 名学生,平均年龄为 22.17 岁。其中,90.56%为女性。SSHF 项目的平均得分为 3.82 分(满分 5 分)。得分最高的项目如下:临床模拟的益处,因为它将理论与实践相结合;从所犯错误中学习的可能性;以及在模拟训练过程中的舒适和尊重。得分最低的项目是 "每个模拟病例的时间安排"。我们发现,各附属中心的结果差异很大:学生们对三个附属中心的高仿真临床模拟均表现出较高的满意度。然而,他们表示需要在临床模拟课程中投入更多时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nursing Students' Satisfaction with Clinical Simulation: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

Clinical Simulation improves results in the students' learning tests and allows for preserving acquired knowledge for longer periods of time, promoting more significant learning. This study was conducted to analyze Nursing students' satisfaction with Clinical Simulation in three centres attached to a university from southern Spain.

Methods: A quantitative, non-experimental and cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out. The students included were attending their third year of the Nursing undergraduate course and had already taken part in training sessions by means of Clinical Simulation. The Satisfaction Scale with High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation in Students (SSHF) was used for data collection. This scale has been validated and has 33 items grouped into eight factors. The SPSS software (version 28), was used for data analysis, establishing p-values < 0.05 for the statistically significant differences.

Results: The participants were 180 students, with a mean age of 22.17 years old. Of them, 90.56% belonged to the female gender. A mean score of 3.82 out of 5 was obtained in the SSHF items. The items that obtained the highest scores were the following: benefits of Clinical Simulation as it relates theory with practise; possibility of learning based on the mistakes made; and comfort and respect while the sessions were developed. The item that obtained the lowest score was "timing for each simulation case". We found significant differences in the results obtained according to each attached centre.

Conclusions: The students showed high satisfaction levels regarding High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation in each of the three attached centres included in the study. Nevertheless, they stated the need to invest more time in Clinical Simulation sessions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信