Nathan E Bartman, Nicole T Vargas, Lora A Cavuoto, David Hostler, Riana R Pryor
{"title":"在湿球温度相等的干热和温湿环境中行走的热应变差异。","authors":"Nathan E Bartman, Nicole T Vargas, Lora A Cavuoto, David Hostler, Riana R Pryor","doi":"10.1080/23328940.2024.2384185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is a commonly used measure to predict heat strain in workers. Different combinations of environmental conditions can create equivalent WBGT, yet it remains unknown whether biophysical, physiological, and perceptual responses vary when working in different but equivalent hot conditions. The purpose of the study was to compare body heat storage and physiological and perceptual strain during walking in hot-dry and warm-wet conditions of the same WBGT. Twelve subjects (age: 22 ± 2 y) walked for 90 min at 60% maximum heart rate in a 27.8°C WBGT environment of hot-dry (HD: 40°C, 19% relative humidity) or warm-wet (WW: 30°C, 77% relative humidity) conditions. Partitional calorimetry was used to estimate heat storage. Core temperature at 90 min (HD: 38.5 ± 0.5°C; WW: 38.4 ± 0.3°C, <i>p</i> = 0.244) and cumulative heat storage (HD: 115 ± 531 Kj; WW: 333 ± 269 Kj, <i>p</i> = 0.242) were not different. At 90 min, heart rate was not different (HD: 160 ± 19 bpm; WW: 154 ± 15 bpm, <i>p</i> = 0.149) but skin temperature (HD: 36.6 ± 0.9°C; WW: 34.7 ± 0.6°C, <i>p</i> < 0.001), thirst (HD: 6.8 a.u.; WW: 5.3 a.u. <i>p</i> = 0.043), and sweat rate (HD: 15.1 ± 4.4 g·min<sup>-1</sup>; WW: 10.0 ± 4.1 g·min<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were greater in HD compared to WW. Hot environments of equivalent 27.8°C WBGT created equivalent core temperature despite differences in physiological strain during exercise, including earlier onset of cardiovascular strain, greater sweat rate, and higher skin temperature compared to a WW environment. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04624919.</p>","PeriodicalId":36837,"journal":{"name":"Temperature","volume":"11 4","pages":"333-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heat strain differences walking in hot-dry and warm-wet environments of equivalent wet bulb globe temperature.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan E Bartman, Nicole T Vargas, Lora A Cavuoto, David Hostler, Riana R Pryor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23328940.2024.2384185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is a commonly used measure to predict heat strain in workers. Different combinations of environmental conditions can create equivalent WBGT, yet it remains unknown whether biophysical, physiological, and perceptual responses vary when working in different but equivalent hot conditions. The purpose of the study was to compare body heat storage and physiological and perceptual strain during walking in hot-dry and warm-wet conditions of the same WBGT. Twelve subjects (age: 22 ± 2 y) walked for 90 min at 60% maximum heart rate in a 27.8°C WBGT environment of hot-dry (HD: 40°C, 19% relative humidity) or warm-wet (WW: 30°C, 77% relative humidity) conditions. Partitional calorimetry was used to estimate heat storage. Core temperature at 90 min (HD: 38.5 ± 0.5°C; WW: 38.4 ± 0.3°C, <i>p</i> = 0.244) and cumulative heat storage (HD: 115 ± 531 Kj; WW: 333 ± 269 Kj, <i>p</i> = 0.242) were not different. At 90 min, heart rate was not different (HD: 160 ± 19 bpm; WW: 154 ± 15 bpm, <i>p</i> = 0.149) but skin temperature (HD: 36.6 ± 0.9°C; WW: 34.7 ± 0.6°C, <i>p</i> < 0.001), thirst (HD: 6.8 a.u.; WW: 5.3 a.u. <i>p</i> = 0.043), and sweat rate (HD: 15.1 ± 4.4 g·min<sup>-1</sup>; WW: 10.0 ± 4.1 g·min<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were greater in HD compared to WW. Hot environments of equivalent 27.8°C WBGT created equivalent core temperature despite differences in physiological strain during exercise, including earlier onset of cardiovascular strain, greater sweat rate, and higher skin temperature compared to a WW environment. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04624919.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Temperature\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"333-349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583583/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Temperature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2024.2384185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temperature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2024.2384185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
Heat strain differences walking in hot-dry and warm-wet environments of equivalent wet bulb globe temperature.
Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is a commonly used measure to predict heat strain in workers. Different combinations of environmental conditions can create equivalent WBGT, yet it remains unknown whether biophysical, physiological, and perceptual responses vary when working in different but equivalent hot conditions. The purpose of the study was to compare body heat storage and physiological and perceptual strain during walking in hot-dry and warm-wet conditions of the same WBGT. Twelve subjects (age: 22 ± 2 y) walked for 90 min at 60% maximum heart rate in a 27.8°C WBGT environment of hot-dry (HD: 40°C, 19% relative humidity) or warm-wet (WW: 30°C, 77% relative humidity) conditions. Partitional calorimetry was used to estimate heat storage. Core temperature at 90 min (HD: 38.5 ± 0.5°C; WW: 38.4 ± 0.3°C, p = 0.244) and cumulative heat storage (HD: 115 ± 531 Kj; WW: 333 ± 269 Kj, p = 0.242) were not different. At 90 min, heart rate was not different (HD: 160 ± 19 bpm; WW: 154 ± 15 bpm, p = 0.149) but skin temperature (HD: 36.6 ± 0.9°C; WW: 34.7 ± 0.6°C, p < 0.001), thirst (HD: 6.8 a.u.; WW: 5.3 a.u. p = 0.043), and sweat rate (HD: 15.1 ± 4.4 g·min-1; WW: 10.0 ± 4.1 g·min-1, p < 0.001) were greater in HD compared to WW. Hot environments of equivalent 27.8°C WBGT created equivalent core temperature despite differences in physiological strain during exercise, including earlier onset of cardiovascular strain, greater sweat rate, and higher skin temperature compared to a WW environment. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04624919.