患者对疼痛治疗中性别差异的态度和体验。

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy12060175
Carolin Alexandra Boldt, Dirk Keiner, Norman Best, Thilo Bertsche
{"title":"患者对疼痛治疗中性别差异的态度和体验。","authors":"Carolin Alexandra Boldt, Dirk Keiner, Norman Best, Thilo Bertsche","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy12060175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological, pharmacological, and socio-cultural aspects influence gender-specific effects in pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gender-specific aspects of pain management were assessed in a rural outpatient center via semi-structured patient interview: (i) general gender aspects (total population) from 1 = \"fully disagree\" to 5 = \"fully agree\"; and (ii) individual pain (matched pairs) via numeric analog scale (NAS) from 0 = \"no pain\" to 10 = \"maximum pain\". Patient charts were assessed for pain management (WHO-ladder).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 113 patients were enrolled (59.18 [SD: 12.76] years, 46% female, 54% male, 0% diverse), and 42 were matched into female-male pairs. (i) Women and men agreed that men and women should be treated equally despite biological differences (median: 5 [women] vs. 5 [men]; <i>p</i> = 0.789). As a reason for gender-specific aspects, \"medication concentration\" was reported more frequently by women (<i>p</i> = 0.038) and \"no answer\" by men (<i>p</i> = 0.014). (ii) Mean value (SD) of pain (NAS) was 4.0 (SD 2.3) for women and 3.3 (SD 2.6) for men (<i>p</i> = 0.215) with a positive correlation between pain management escalation (WHO-ladder) and the pain score (NAS) only in men (r = 0.704, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Women rather reported an influence of adverse drug reactions on treatment contentment than men (<i>p</i> = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although patients pleaded for gender-independent equal treatment, gender-specific differences in pain therapy were found.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes and Experiences of Patients Regarding Gender-Specific Aspects of Pain Management.\",\"authors\":\"Carolin Alexandra Boldt, Dirk Keiner, Norman Best, Thilo Bertsche\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pharmacy12060175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological, pharmacological, and socio-cultural aspects influence gender-specific effects in pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gender-specific aspects of pain management were assessed in a rural outpatient center via semi-structured patient interview: (i) general gender aspects (total population) from 1 = \\\"fully disagree\\\" to 5 = \\\"fully agree\\\"; and (ii) individual pain (matched pairs) via numeric analog scale (NAS) from 0 = \\\"no pain\\\" to 10 = \\\"maximum pain\\\". Patient charts were assessed for pain management (WHO-ladder).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 113 patients were enrolled (59.18 [SD: 12.76] years, 46% female, 54% male, 0% diverse), and 42 were matched into female-male pairs. (i) Women and men agreed that men and women should be treated equally despite biological differences (median: 5 [women] vs. 5 [men]; <i>p</i> = 0.789). As a reason for gender-specific aspects, \\\"medication concentration\\\" was reported more frequently by women (<i>p</i> = 0.038) and \\\"no answer\\\" by men (<i>p</i> = 0.014). (ii) Mean value (SD) of pain (NAS) was 4.0 (SD 2.3) for women and 3.3 (SD 2.6) for men (<i>p</i> = 0.215) with a positive correlation between pain management escalation (WHO-ladder) and the pain score (NAS) only in men (r = 0.704, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Women rather reported an influence of adverse drug reactions on treatment contentment than men (<i>p</i> = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although patients pleaded for gender-independent equal treatment, gender-specific differences in pain therapy were found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587403/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12060175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12060175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物学、药理学和社会文化方面对疼痛治疗的性别特异性影响:方法:在农村门诊中心,通过对患者进行半结构化访谈,评估了疼痛治疗中的性别特异性:在一个农村门诊中心,通过半结构化患者访谈对疼痛治疗中的性别特异性进行了评估:(i) 一般性别方面(总人口),从 1 ="完全不同意 "到 5 ="完全同意";(ii) 通过数字模拟量表(NAS)评估个体疼痛(配对),从 0 ="无疼痛 "到 10 ="最大疼痛"。对患者病历进行疼痛管理评估(WHO-阶梯):共有 113 名患者(59.18 [SD: 12.76]岁,46% 为女性,54% 为男性,0% 为不同性别)参加了此次研究,其中 42 名患者为男女配对。(i) 女性和男性都认为,尽管存在生理差异,但男性和女性应受到同等对待(中位数:5 [女性] 对 5 [男性];P = 0.789)。作为性别差异的原因,女性报告 "药物浓度 "的频率更高(p = 0.038),而男性报告 "无答案 "的频率更高(p = 0.014)。(ii) 女性疼痛(NAS)的平均值(标清)为 4.0(标清 2.3),男性为 3.3(标清 2.6)(p = 0.215),只有男性的疼痛管理升级(WHO-阶梯)与疼痛评分(NAS)呈正相关(r = 0.704,p = 0.001)。与男性相比,女性更愿意报告药物不良反应对治疗满意度的影响(p = 0.042):结论:尽管患者恳求与性别无关的平等治疗,但在疼痛治疗中还是发现了性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitudes and Experiences of Patients Regarding Gender-Specific Aspects of Pain Management.

Background: Biological, pharmacological, and socio-cultural aspects influence gender-specific effects in pain management.

Methods: Gender-specific aspects of pain management were assessed in a rural outpatient center via semi-structured patient interview: (i) general gender aspects (total population) from 1 = "fully disagree" to 5 = "fully agree"; and (ii) individual pain (matched pairs) via numeric analog scale (NAS) from 0 = "no pain" to 10 = "maximum pain". Patient charts were assessed for pain management (WHO-ladder).

Results: In total, 113 patients were enrolled (59.18 [SD: 12.76] years, 46% female, 54% male, 0% diverse), and 42 were matched into female-male pairs. (i) Women and men agreed that men and women should be treated equally despite biological differences (median: 5 [women] vs. 5 [men]; p = 0.789). As a reason for gender-specific aspects, "medication concentration" was reported more frequently by women (p = 0.038) and "no answer" by men (p = 0.014). (ii) Mean value (SD) of pain (NAS) was 4.0 (SD 2.3) for women and 3.3 (SD 2.6) for men (p = 0.215) with a positive correlation between pain management escalation (WHO-ladder) and the pain score (NAS) only in men (r = 0.704, p = 0.001). Women rather reported an influence of adverse drug reactions on treatment contentment than men (p = 0.042).

Conclusions: Although patients pleaded for gender-independent equal treatment, gender-specific differences in pain therapy were found.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信