头颈部鳞状细胞癌的结节评估和结节外扩展:计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像的启示。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nicola Maggialetti, Ilaria Villanova, Sara Greco, Angela Sardaro, Maria Teresa Lagrasta, Claudia Dipalma, Fabio Maglitto, Eleonora Bicci, Nicola Maria Lucarelli, Chiara Copelli, Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora
{"title":"头颈部鳞状细胞癌的结节评估和结节外扩展:计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像的启示。","authors":"Nicola Maggialetti, Ilaria Villanova, Sara Greco, Angela Sardaro, Maria Teresa Lagrasta, Claudia Dipalma, Fabio Maglitto, Eleonora Bicci, Nicola Maria Lucarelli, Chiara Copelli, Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora","doi":"10.1007/s11547-024-01929-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the concordance between computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histological examination in the evaluation of lymph nodal involvement (N+) and extranodal extension (ENE+) in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head-neck district (HNSCC). The second end point was to evaluate which of the imaging features was more sensitive and specific in establishing N+ and ENE+, and comparing the diagnostic accuracy between CT and MRI.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>58 patients with HNSCC undergoing surgical treatment with lymph node dissection at the Policlinico of Bari were enrolled in this retrospective study. The criteria used for identifying radiological N+ (rN+) included six characteristics; the presence of any two or more criteria out of these six was considered rN+. For each rN+, the radiological extranodal extension (rENE+) was evaluated analyzing three characteristics; rENE was considered positive if any one criterion was present.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 167 lymph nodes, 45/167 (27%) had rN+, out of which 20/45 (44%) were rENE+. On pathological examination, 38/45 (84%) nodes were N+ and 11/20 (55%) were ENE+. The agreement between imaging and histology in the evaluation of N was (149/167) 89% with a good concordance (k = 0.7). The agreement between imaging and histology in the evaluation of ENE was (35/45) 78% with a moderate concordance (k = 0.5). Loss of fatty hilum was found to be the most sensitive (84%) imaging finding in N+ evaluation. Capsular irregularity with fat stranding had the highest sensitivity (82%) for the determination of ENE+. Comparing CT and MRI imaging in the evaluation of N+ and ENE+, we found no statistically significant differences (p-value of 0.3 for N+ and p-value of 0.3 for ENE +).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Imaging has good confidence in detecting rN+ but modest in assessing rENE+. Further research could improve the imaging specificity for the determination of rENE.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nodal assessment and extranodal extension in head and neck squamous cell cancer: insights from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Maggialetti, Ilaria Villanova, Sara Greco, Angela Sardaro, Maria Teresa Lagrasta, Claudia Dipalma, Fabio Maglitto, Eleonora Bicci, Nicola Maria Lucarelli, Chiara Copelli, Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11547-024-01929-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the concordance between computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histological examination in the evaluation of lymph nodal involvement (N+) and extranodal extension (ENE+) in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head-neck district (HNSCC). The second end point was to evaluate which of the imaging features was more sensitive and specific in establishing N+ and ENE+, and comparing the diagnostic accuracy between CT and MRI.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>58 patients with HNSCC undergoing surgical treatment with lymph node dissection at the Policlinico of Bari were enrolled in this retrospective study. The criteria used for identifying radiological N+ (rN+) included six characteristics; the presence of any two or more criteria out of these six was considered rN+. For each rN+, the radiological extranodal extension (rENE+) was evaluated analyzing three characteristics; rENE was considered positive if any one criterion was present.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 167 lymph nodes, 45/167 (27%) had rN+, out of which 20/45 (44%) were rENE+. On pathological examination, 38/45 (84%) nodes were N+ and 11/20 (55%) were ENE+. The agreement between imaging and histology in the evaluation of N was (149/167) 89% with a good concordance (k = 0.7). The agreement between imaging and histology in the evaluation of ENE was (35/45) 78% with a moderate concordance (k = 0.5). Loss of fatty hilum was found to be the most sensitive (84%) imaging finding in N+ evaluation. Capsular irregularity with fat stranding had the highest sensitivity (82%) for the determination of ENE+. Comparing CT and MRI imaging in the evaluation of N+ and ENE+, we found no statistically significant differences (p-value of 0.3 for N+ and p-value of 0.3 for ENE +).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Imaging has good confidence in detecting rN+ but modest in assessing rENE+. Further research could improve the imaging specificity for the determination of rENE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01929-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01929-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:该研究旨在评估计算机断层扫描(CT)/磁共振成像(MRI)和组织学检查在评估头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者淋巴结受累(N+)和结外扩展(ENE+)方面的一致性。第二个终点是评估哪种成像特征对确定 N+ 和 ENE+ 更敏感、更特异,并比较 CT 和 MRI 的诊断准确性。材料和方法:这项回顾性研究共纳入了 58 名在巴里 Policlinico 医院接受淋巴结清扫手术治疗的 HNSCC 患者。确定放射学 N+(rN+)的标准包括六项特征;在这六项特征中,任何两项或两项以上的特征均被视为 rN+。对于每一个 rN+,放射学结外扩展(rENE+)的评估分析包括三个特征;如果出现任何一个标准,则认为 rENE 为阳性:在 167 个淋巴结中,45/167(27%)个为 rN+,其中 20/45(44%)个为 rENE+。病理检查结果显示,38/45(84%)个结节为 N+,11/20(55%)个结节为 ENE+。在对 N 的评估中,影像学和组织学的一致性为 (149/167) 89%,一致性良好 (k = 0.7)。在对ENE的评估中,成像与组织学的一致性为(35/45)78%,一致性为中等(k = 0.5)。在 N+ 评估中,脂肪帽缺失是最敏感的影像学发现(84%)。在确定ENE+时,囊不规则伴脂肪串的灵敏度最高(82%)。比较 CT 和 MRI 成像在 N+ 和 ENE+ 评估中的作用,我们发现两者在统计学上没有显著差异(N+ 的 p 值为 0.3,ENE + 的 p 值为 0.3):结论:影像学在检测 rN+ 方面有很好的可信度,但在评估 rENE+ 方面的可信度不高。进一步的研究可以提高成像在确定 rENE 方面的特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nodal assessment and extranodal extension in head and neck squamous cell cancer: insights from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the concordance between computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histological examination in the evaluation of lymph nodal involvement (N+) and extranodal extension (ENE+) in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head-neck district (HNSCC). The second end point was to evaluate which of the imaging features was more sensitive and specific in establishing N+ and ENE+, and comparing the diagnostic accuracy between CT and MRI.

Material and methods: 58 patients with HNSCC undergoing surgical treatment with lymph node dissection at the Policlinico of Bari were enrolled in this retrospective study. The criteria used for identifying radiological N+ (rN+) included six characteristics; the presence of any two or more criteria out of these six was considered rN+. For each rN+, the radiological extranodal extension (rENE+) was evaluated analyzing three characteristics; rENE was considered positive if any one criterion was present.

Results: Of 167 lymph nodes, 45/167 (27%) had rN+, out of which 20/45 (44%) were rENE+. On pathological examination, 38/45 (84%) nodes were N+ and 11/20 (55%) were ENE+. The agreement between imaging and histology in the evaluation of N was (149/167) 89% with a good concordance (k = 0.7). The agreement between imaging and histology in the evaluation of ENE was (35/45) 78% with a moderate concordance (k = 0.5). Loss of fatty hilum was found to be the most sensitive (84%) imaging finding in N+ evaluation. Capsular irregularity with fat stranding had the highest sensitivity (82%) for the determination of ENE+. Comparing CT and MRI imaging in the evaluation of N+ and ENE+, we found no statistically significant differences (p-value of 0.3 for N+ and p-value of 0.3 for ENE +).

Conclusions: Imaging has good confidence in detecting rN+ but modest in assessing rENE+. Further research could improve the imaging specificity for the determination of rENE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Medica
Radiologia Medica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信