Chih-Lin Chuang, Chung-Liang Lai, Ai-Chun Huang, Po-Hua Su, Lee-Ping Chu, Kuen-Chang Hsieh, Hsueh-Kuan Lu
{"title":"双能 X 射线吸收测量法与新型生物电阻抗分析法在全身骨质密度测量方面的比较。","authors":"Chih-Lin Chuang, Chung-Liang Lai, Ai-Chun Huang, Po-Hua Su, Lee-Ping Chu, Kuen-Chang Hsieh, Hsueh-Kuan Lu","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-80721-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bone mineral density (BMD) is a crucial indicator of osteoporosis. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) introduces a new method for assessing body composition, specifically BMD measurement. Compared with existing ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for BMD screening and diagnosis, BIA has the advantages of safety, convenience and speed. However, the accuracy of BIA for BMD measurement needs to be explored. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the novel BIA technique in conducting whole-body BMD assessments in the general population of Taiwan. Overall, 318 healthy adults in Taiwan (37.67 ± 19.44 years of age; 145 male and 173 female patients) were included. Whole-body BMD was measured via foot-to-foot BIA-StarBIA-201 (StarBIA Meditek Co. LTD, Taichung, Taiwan) and the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Lunar Prodigy technology (GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA). Linear regression analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficient, the Bland-Altman plot, and paired t tests were used. The whole-body BMDs measured by BIA and DXA were 1.139 ± 0.124 g/cm<sup>2</sup> and 1.202 ± 0.168 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The regression equation was y = 1.057x + 0.063. The Pearson correlation coefficient, mean difference, and limits of agreement were r = 0.737, - 0.053 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, and - 0.290-0.165 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The regression equation was y = 1.057x + 0.063. The Pearson correlation coefficient, mean difference, and limits of agreement were r = 0.737 (p < 0.001), - 0.053 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, and - 0.290-0.165 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Standing BIA was correlated with the DXA gold standard for estimating whole-body BMD in adults; however, its interchangeability remains limited. The potential bias in the measurement results of this study represents a current challenge with BIA compared with that of DXA, and there is still room for improvement. The convenient BIA method for measuring whole-body BMD may be useful in the application of primary screening and future development of BMD assessment methods. BIA is widely used to measure body composition, but its application to the measurement of BMD represents a novel technological breakthrough.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"29127"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of whole body bone mineral density measurements between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and novel bioelectrical impedance analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Lin Chuang, Chung-Liang Lai, Ai-Chun Huang, Po-Hua Su, Lee-Ping Chu, Kuen-Chang Hsieh, Hsueh-Kuan Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-024-80721-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bone mineral density (BMD) is a crucial indicator of osteoporosis. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) introduces a new method for assessing body composition, specifically BMD measurement. Compared with existing ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for BMD screening and diagnosis, BIA has the advantages of safety, convenience and speed. However, the accuracy of BIA for BMD measurement needs to be explored. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the novel BIA technique in conducting whole-body BMD assessments in the general population of Taiwan. Overall, 318 healthy adults in Taiwan (37.67 ± 19.44 years of age; 145 male and 173 female patients) were included. Whole-body BMD was measured via foot-to-foot BIA-StarBIA-201 (StarBIA Meditek Co. LTD, Taichung, Taiwan) and the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Lunar Prodigy technology (GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA). Linear regression analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficient, the Bland-Altman plot, and paired t tests were used. The whole-body BMDs measured by BIA and DXA were 1.139 ± 0.124 g/cm<sup>2</sup> and 1.202 ± 0.168 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The regression equation was y = 1.057x + 0.063. The Pearson correlation coefficient, mean difference, and limits of agreement were r = 0.737, - 0.053 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, and - 0.290-0.165 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The regression equation was y = 1.057x + 0.063. The Pearson correlation coefficient, mean difference, and limits of agreement were r = 0.737 (p < 0.001), - 0.053 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, and - 0.290-0.165 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Standing BIA was correlated with the DXA gold standard for estimating whole-body BMD in adults; however, its interchangeability remains limited. The potential bias in the measurement results of this study represents a current challenge with BIA compared with that of DXA, and there is still room for improvement. The convenient BIA method for measuring whole-body BMD may be useful in the application of primary screening and future development of BMD assessment methods. BIA is widely used to measure body composition, but its application to the measurement of BMD represents a novel technological breakthrough.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"29127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586393/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80721-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80721-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of whole body bone mineral density measurements between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and novel bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Bone mineral density (BMD) is a crucial indicator of osteoporosis. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) introduces a new method for assessing body composition, specifically BMD measurement. Compared with existing ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for BMD screening and diagnosis, BIA has the advantages of safety, convenience and speed. However, the accuracy of BIA for BMD measurement needs to be explored. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the novel BIA technique in conducting whole-body BMD assessments in the general population of Taiwan. Overall, 318 healthy adults in Taiwan (37.67 ± 19.44 years of age; 145 male and 173 female patients) were included. Whole-body BMD was measured via foot-to-foot BIA-StarBIA-201 (StarBIA Meditek Co. LTD, Taichung, Taiwan) and the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Lunar Prodigy technology (GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA). Linear regression analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficient, the Bland-Altman plot, and paired t tests were used. The whole-body BMDs measured by BIA and DXA were 1.139 ± 0.124 g/cm2 and 1.202 ± 0.168 g/cm2, respectively. The regression equation was y = 1.057x + 0.063. The Pearson correlation coefficient, mean difference, and limits of agreement were r = 0.737, - 0.053 g/cm2, and - 0.290-0.165 g/cm2, respectively. The regression equation was y = 1.057x + 0.063. The Pearson correlation coefficient, mean difference, and limits of agreement were r = 0.737 (p < 0.001), - 0.053 g/cm2, and - 0.290-0.165 g/cm2, respectively. Standing BIA was correlated with the DXA gold standard for estimating whole-body BMD in adults; however, its interchangeability remains limited. The potential bias in the measurement results of this study represents a current challenge with BIA compared with that of DXA, and there is still room for improvement. The convenient BIA method for measuring whole-body BMD may be useful in the application of primary screening and future development of BMD assessment methods. BIA is widely used to measure body composition, but its application to the measurement of BMD represents a novel technological breakthrough.
期刊介绍：
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
