Muyu Liu , Bo Pang , Shuoyan Chen , Yiling Zeng , Qi Zhang , Hong Quan , Yu Chang , Zhiyong Yang
{"title":"基于深度学习的多重 CT 优化:在头颈部癌症的强度调节质子疗法中考虑解剖学变化的自适应治疗规划方法。","authors":"Muyu Liu , Bo Pang , Shuoyan Chen , Yiling Zeng , Qi Zhang , Hong Quan , Yu Chang , Zhiyong Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Backgrounds</h3><div>Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is particularly susceptible to range and setup uncertainties, as well as anatomical changes.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We present a framework for IMPT planning that employs a deep learning method for dose prediction based on multiple-CT (MCT). The extra CTs are created from cone-beam CT (CBCT) using deformable registration with the primary planning CT (PCT). Our method also includes a dose mimicking algorithm.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The MCT IMPT planning pipeline involves prediction of robust dose from input images using a deep learning model with a U-net architecture. Deliverable plans may then be created by solving a dose mimicking problem with the predictions as reference dose. Model training, dose prediction and plan generation are performed using a dataset of 55 patients with head and neck cancer in this retrospective study. Among them, 38 patients were used as training set, 7 patients were used as validation set, and 10 patients were reserved as test set for final evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We demonstrated that the deliverable plans generated through subsequent MCT dose mimicking exhibited greater robustness than the robust plans produced by the PCT, as well as enhanced dose sparing for organs at risk. MCT plans had lower D<sub>2%</sub> (76.1 Gy vs. 82.4 Gy), better homogeneity index (7.7% vs. 16.4%) of CTV1 and better conformity index (70.5% vs. 61.5%) of CTV2 than the robust plans produced by the primary planning CT for all test patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We demonstrated the feasibility and advantages of incorporating daily CBCT images into MCT optimization. This approach improves plan robustness against anatomical changes and may reduce the need for plan adaptations in head and neck cancer treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 110650"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive treatment planning approach to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers\",\"authors\":\"Muyu Liu , Bo Pang , Shuoyan Chen , Yiling Zeng , Qi Zhang , Hong Quan , Yu Chang , Zhiyong Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Backgrounds</h3><div>Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is particularly susceptible to range and setup uncertainties, as well as anatomical changes.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We present a framework for IMPT planning that employs a deep learning method for dose prediction based on multiple-CT (MCT). The extra CTs are created from cone-beam CT (CBCT) using deformable registration with the primary planning CT (PCT). Our method also includes a dose mimicking algorithm.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The MCT IMPT planning pipeline involves prediction of robust dose from input images using a deep learning model with a U-net architecture. Deliverable plans may then be created by solving a dose mimicking problem with the predictions as reference dose. Model training, dose prediction and plan generation are performed using a dataset of 55 patients with head and neck cancer in this retrospective study. Among them, 38 patients were used as training set, 7 patients were used as validation set, and 10 patients were reserved as test set for final evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We demonstrated that the deliverable plans generated through subsequent MCT dose mimicking exhibited greater robustness than the robust plans produced by the PCT, as well as enhanced dose sparing for organs at risk. MCT plans had lower D<sub>2%</sub> (76.1 Gy vs. 82.4 Gy), better homogeneity index (7.7% vs. 16.4%) of CTV1 and better conformity index (70.5% vs. 61.5%) of CTV2 than the robust plans produced by the primary planning CT for all test patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We demonstrated the feasibility and advantages of incorporating daily CBCT images into MCT optimization. This approach improves plan robustness against anatomical changes and may reduce the need for plan adaptations in head and neck cancer treatments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024043123\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024043123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deep learning-based multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive treatment planning approach to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers
Backgrounds
Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is particularly susceptible to range and setup uncertainties, as well as anatomical changes.
Purpose
We present a framework for IMPT planning that employs a deep learning method for dose prediction based on multiple-CT (MCT). The extra CTs are created from cone-beam CT (CBCT) using deformable registration with the primary planning CT (PCT). Our method also includes a dose mimicking algorithm.
Methods
The MCT IMPT planning pipeline involves prediction of robust dose from input images using a deep learning model with a U-net architecture. Deliverable plans may then be created by solving a dose mimicking problem with the predictions as reference dose. Model training, dose prediction and plan generation are performed using a dataset of 55 patients with head and neck cancer in this retrospective study. Among them, 38 patients were used as training set, 7 patients were used as validation set, and 10 patients were reserved as test set for final evaluation.
Results
We demonstrated that the deliverable plans generated through subsequent MCT dose mimicking exhibited greater robustness than the robust plans produced by the PCT, as well as enhanced dose sparing for organs at risk. MCT plans had lower D2% (76.1 Gy vs. 82.4 Gy), better homogeneity index (7.7% vs. 16.4%) of CTV1 and better conformity index (70.5% vs. 61.5%) of CTV2 than the robust plans produced by the primary planning CT for all test patients.
Conclusions
We demonstrated the feasibility and advantages of incorporating daily CBCT images into MCT optimization. This approach improves plan robustness against anatomical changes and may reduce the need for plan adaptations in head and neck cancer treatments.
期刊介绍:
Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.