急诊科超声引导区域麻醉 (UGRA):范围综述。

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain management Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1080/17581869.2024.2431474
Syed Mohammad J Mahmood, Nikhil B Bhana, Clarence Kong, Nik Theyyunni, William J Schaeffer, Charles W Kropf, Nicole T Klekowski, Brendan W Munzer, Zachary B Rotter, Ashley E Hall, Jonathan D Porath, William J Peterson, Ryan V Tucker
{"title":"急诊科超声引导区域麻醉 (UGRA):范围综述。","authors":"Syed Mohammad J Mahmood, Nikhil B Bhana, Clarence Kong, Nik Theyyunni, William J Schaeffer, Charles W Kropf, Nicole T Klekowski, Brendan W Munzer, Zachary B Rotter, Ashley E Hall, Jonathan D Porath, William J Peterson, Ryan V Tucker","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2431474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While many studies have been published on Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia in the Emergency Department (ED), there has been no previous study assessing the current state of the literature based in the form of a scoping review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current state of the literature on UGRA performed in the ED setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines (Figure 1), two reviewers evaluated each title and abstract and were included if they described a UGRA technique performed on patients in the ED by an ED provider. Cohen's kappa coefficients were calculated for each level of review.[Figure: see text].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,456 abstracts, a total of 53 articles were included in the analysis, of which 28 (52.8%) were case series and 11 (20.8%) were randomized control trials (RCTs). The most common types of nerve block represented in these studies were femoral nerve/fascia iliaca (14), brachial plexus (7), and forearm (radial, ulnar, median nerves) (7). 47 of the 53 articles were published in or after the year 2010.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current literature supporting UGRA use in the ED is growing but unbalanced, requiring large population studies to demonstrate safety and efficacy of these techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"571-578"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) in the emergency department: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Syed Mohammad J Mahmood, Nikhil B Bhana, Clarence Kong, Nik Theyyunni, William J Schaeffer, Charles W Kropf, Nicole T Klekowski, Brendan W Munzer, Zachary B Rotter, Ashley E Hall, Jonathan D Porath, William J Peterson, Ryan V Tucker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17581869.2024.2431474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While many studies have been published on Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia in the Emergency Department (ED), there has been no previous study assessing the current state of the literature based in the form of a scoping review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current state of the literature on UGRA performed in the ED setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines (Figure 1), two reviewers evaluated each title and abstract and were included if they described a UGRA technique performed on patients in the ED by an ED provider. Cohen's kappa coefficients were calculated for each level of review.[Figure: see text].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,456 abstracts, a total of 53 articles were included in the analysis, of which 28 (52.8%) were case series and 11 (20.8%) were randomized control trials (RCTs). The most common types of nerve block represented in these studies were femoral nerve/fascia iliaca (14), brachial plexus (7), and forearm (radial, ulnar, median nerves) (7). 47 of the 53 articles were published in or after the year 2010.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current literature supporting UGRA use in the ED is growing but unbalanced, requiring large population studies to demonstrate safety and efficacy of these techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"571-578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2024.2431474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2024.2431474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:虽然已经发表了许多关于急诊科(ED)超声引导区域麻醉的研究,但此前还没有以范围综述的形式对文献现状进行评估的研究:本研究旨在评估在急诊科环境下进行 UGRA 的文献现状:方法:检索 EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 数据库中的相关研究。按照 PRISMA-ScR 指南(图 1),两名审稿人对每篇标题和摘要进行评估,如果其中描述了急诊室医疗人员在急诊室对患者实施的 UGRA 技术,则将其纳入。每级评审均计算了科恩卡帕系数(Cohen's kappa coefficient):在 1,456 篇摘要中,共有 53 篇文章被纳入分析,其中 28 篇(52.8%)为病例系列,11 篇(20.8%)为随机对照试验(RCT)。这些研究中最常见的神经阻滞类型包括股神经/髂筋膜(14)、臂丛神经(7)和前臂神经(桡神经、尺神经和正中神经)(7)。53 篇文章中有 47 篇发表于 2010 年或之后:目前支持在急诊室使用 UGRA 的文献越来越多,但并不平衡,需要进行大规模的人群研究来证明这些技术的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) in the emergency department: a scoping review.

Introduction: While many studies have been published on Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia in the Emergency Department (ED), there has been no previous study assessing the current state of the literature based in the form of a scoping review.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current state of the literature on UGRA performed in the ED setting.

Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines (Figure 1), two reviewers evaluated each title and abstract and were included if they described a UGRA technique performed on patients in the ED by an ED provider. Cohen's kappa coefficients were calculated for each level of review.[Figure: see text].

Results: Of the 1,456 abstracts, a total of 53 articles were included in the analysis, of which 28 (52.8%) were case series and 11 (20.8%) were randomized control trials (RCTs). The most common types of nerve block represented in these studies were femoral nerve/fascia iliaca (14), brachial plexus (7), and forearm (radial, ulnar, median nerves) (7). 47 of the 53 articles were published in or after the year 2010.

Conclusion: Current literature supporting UGRA use in the ED is growing but unbalanced, requiring large population studies to demonstrate safety and efficacy of these techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信