Alexandru Petru Ion, Alexandra Asztalos, Claudiu Constantin Ciucanu, Eliza Russu, Adrian Vasile Mureșan, Eliza-Mihaela Arbănași, Traian V Chirilă, Gabriela Strnad, Emil-Marian Arbănași
{"title":"优化动脉组织厚度测量方案:数字游标卡尺与数字测厚仪。","authors":"Alexandru Petru Ion, Alexandra Asztalos, Claudiu Constantin Ciucanu, Eliza Russu, Adrian Vasile Mureșan, Eliza-Mihaela Arbănași, Traian V Chirilă, Gabriela Strnad, Emil-Marian Arbănași","doi":"10.3390/mps7060090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to analyze the reproducibility of sample thickness measurements taken by a non-experienced user by comparing a standard digital vernier caliper, with four different protocols, to a specialized thickness gauge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study is a methodological study where we examined the thickness of the porcine arterial wall in the thoracic aorta of six pigs. Two adjacent samples of 10 × 10 mm from each aorta were excised longitudinally from the anterior wall, resulting in twelve specimens. Five protocols were employed to measure the thickness of each sample. In four of these protocols, digital vernier calipers (Multicomp PRO MP012475) were utilized, while the fifth protocol utilized a specialized digital thickness gauge (Mitutoyo 547-500S, Mitutoyo Corp., Kawasaki, Japan).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a higher average thickness of the samples during the initial measurement compared to the second measurement (1.11 ± 0.16 vs. 0.94 ± 0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.0319) with the first protocol and smaller values than those determined at the last measurement (0.93 ± 0.15 vs. 1.10 ± 0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.0135) for the third protocol. Further, with the digital vernier calipers, we recorded lower values for all four protocols than for the digital thickness gauge determinations. In addition, we computed the ratio of the thicknesses measured during the first, second, and third measurements to analyze how consistent the values were across the three consecutive measurements, with no difference regarding the third, fourth, and control protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The digital thickness gauge offers dependable measurements, regardless of the user's expertise in assessing tissue thickness, and demonstrates a substantially higher reproducibility when compared to the digital vernier. We also found that taking an average of the thickness measurements from four specific points on each half of the sides or on each diagonal of each corner yielded consistently reliable results over time when using a standard digital vernier caliper instead of a specialized one.</p>","PeriodicalId":18715,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Protocols","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Arterial Tissue Thickness Measurement Protocols: Digital Vernier Caliper Versus Digital Thickness Gauge.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandru Petru Ion, Alexandra Asztalos, Claudiu Constantin Ciucanu, Eliza Russu, Adrian Vasile Mureșan, Eliza-Mihaela Arbănași, Traian V Chirilă, Gabriela Strnad, Emil-Marian Arbănași\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/mps7060090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to analyze the reproducibility of sample thickness measurements taken by a non-experienced user by comparing a standard digital vernier caliper, with four different protocols, to a specialized thickness gauge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study is a methodological study where we examined the thickness of the porcine arterial wall in the thoracic aorta of six pigs. Two adjacent samples of 10 × 10 mm from each aorta were excised longitudinally from the anterior wall, resulting in twelve specimens. Five protocols were employed to measure the thickness of each sample. In four of these protocols, digital vernier calipers (Multicomp PRO MP012475) were utilized, while the fifth protocol utilized a specialized digital thickness gauge (Mitutoyo 547-500S, Mitutoyo Corp., Kawasaki, Japan).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a higher average thickness of the samples during the initial measurement compared to the second measurement (1.11 ± 0.16 vs. 0.94 ± 0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.0319) with the first protocol and smaller values than those determined at the last measurement (0.93 ± 0.15 vs. 1.10 ± 0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.0135) for the third protocol. Further, with the digital vernier calipers, we recorded lower values for all four protocols than for the digital thickness gauge determinations. In addition, we computed the ratio of the thicknesses measured during the first, second, and third measurements to analyze how consistent the values were across the three consecutive measurements, with no difference regarding the third, fourth, and control protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The digital thickness gauge offers dependable measurements, regardless of the user's expertise in assessing tissue thickness, and demonstrates a substantially higher reproducibility when compared to the digital vernier. We also found that taking an average of the thickness measurements from four specific points on each half of the sides or on each diagonal of each corner yielded consistently reliable results over time when using a standard digital vernier caliper instead of a specialized one.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods and Protocols\",\"volume\":\"7 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587071/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods and Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps7060090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps7060090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究的目的是通过比较标准数字游标卡尺和专用测厚仪的四种不同方案,分析非经验用户测量样本厚度的可重复性:本研究是一项方法学研究,我们检测了六头猪胸主动脉的猪动脉壁厚度。从每条主动脉的前壁纵向切除两个 10 × 10 毫米的相邻样本,共得到 12 个样本。采用五种方案测量每个样本的厚度。其中四个方案使用数字游标卡尺(Multicomp PRO MP012475),第五个方案使用专用数字测厚仪(Mitutoyo 547-500S,三丰公司,日本川崎):结果:我们观察到,与第二次测量相比,第一次测量时样品的平均厚度更高(1.11 ± 0.16 vs. 0.94 ± 0.17,p = 0.0319),而第三次测量时样品的平均厚度比最后一次测量时的数值更小(0.93 ± 0.15 vs. 1.10 ± 0.15,p = 0.0135)。此外,使用数字游标卡尺,我们在所有四个方案中记录的数值都低于数字测厚仪测定的数值。此外,我们还计算了第一次、第二次和第三次测量所测厚度的比值,以分析三次连续测量值的一致性,结果显示第三次、第四次和对照组的测量值没有差异:数字测厚仪提供了可靠的测量结果,无论用户是否具备评估组织厚度的专业知识,与数字游标相比,数字测厚仪的可重复性都要高得多。我们还发现,在使用标准数字游标卡尺而不是专用游标卡尺的情况下,从两侧各半或每个角的对角线上的四个特定点测量厚度的平均值,随着时间的推移会产生一致可靠的结果。
Optimizing Arterial Tissue Thickness Measurement Protocols: Digital Vernier Caliper Versus Digital Thickness Gauge.
Background: The aim of this study is to analyze the reproducibility of sample thickness measurements taken by a non-experienced user by comparing a standard digital vernier caliper, with four different protocols, to a specialized thickness gauge.
Methods: The current study is a methodological study where we examined the thickness of the porcine arterial wall in the thoracic aorta of six pigs. Two adjacent samples of 10 × 10 mm from each aorta were excised longitudinally from the anterior wall, resulting in twelve specimens. Five protocols were employed to measure the thickness of each sample. In four of these protocols, digital vernier calipers (Multicomp PRO MP012475) were utilized, while the fifth protocol utilized a specialized digital thickness gauge (Mitutoyo 547-500S, Mitutoyo Corp., Kawasaki, Japan).
Results: We observed a higher average thickness of the samples during the initial measurement compared to the second measurement (1.11 ± 0.16 vs. 0.94 ± 0.17, p = 0.0319) with the first protocol and smaller values than those determined at the last measurement (0.93 ± 0.15 vs. 1.10 ± 0.15, p = 0.0135) for the third protocol. Further, with the digital vernier calipers, we recorded lower values for all four protocols than for the digital thickness gauge determinations. In addition, we computed the ratio of the thicknesses measured during the first, second, and third measurements to analyze how consistent the values were across the three consecutive measurements, with no difference regarding the third, fourth, and control protocols.
Conclusions: The digital thickness gauge offers dependable measurements, regardless of the user's expertise in assessing tissue thickness, and demonstrates a substantially higher reproducibility when compared to the digital vernier. We also found that taking an average of the thickness measurements from four specific points on each half of the sides or on each diagonal of each corner yielded consistently reliable results over time when using a standard digital vernier caliper instead of a specialized one.