Cara D Varley, Jennifer H Ku, Emily Henkle, Luke Strnad, Kevin L Winthrop
{"title":"漫长而曲折的道路:美国联邦医疗保险(Medicare)支气管扩张症患者在使用多种抗生素治疗复合分枝杆菌肺病后的三年死亡率。","authors":"Cara D Varley, Jennifer H Ku, Emily Henkle, Luke Strnad, Kevin L Winthrop","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Although increased mortality has been reported among people with <i>Mycobacterium avium complex</i> pulmonary disease (MAC-PD), data are limited on survival associated with various antibiotic regimens used to treat MAC-PD. We conducted a comparative analysis of 3-year mortality in Medicare beneficiaries with bronchiectasis using various MAC-PD regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with bronchiectasis (01/2006-12/2014). We limited our cohort to new MAC-PD therapy users. MAC-PD therapy was defined as ≥60-day prescriptions for a macrolide plus ≥1 other MAC-PD antibiotic. Guideline-based therapy (GBT) included a macrolide, ethambutol, and/or rifamycin. Using Cox proportional hazard models, we calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for death up to 3 years after therapy start between the following groups: (1) 2007 GBT versus non-GBT; (2) 2020 GBT versus non-GBT; and (3) macrolide-ethambutol-rifamycin (3-drug) versus macrolide-ethambutol (2-drug).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 4820 new MAC-PD therapy users, of whom 866 (17.9%) were deceased within 3 years of therapy initiation. Of 3040 (63.1%) beneficiaries prescribed 2007 GBT, 472 (15.5%) were deceased by 3 years, compared to 394 (22.1%) of 1780 (36.9%) prescribed non-GBT (aHR 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], .72-.94). We observed a similar trend for 2020 GBT versus non-GBT (aHR 0.81; 95% CI, .70-.94]). Three-year-mortality was similar between those starting 3-drug versus 2-drug regimens (aHR 0.89; 95% CI, .74-1.08]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among Medicare new MAC-PD therapy users, 3-year-mortality was higher in those prescribed non-GBT regimens compared to GBT regimens. Whether this finding suggests improved efficacy of GBT and/or differential characteristic of those using non-GBT regimens deserves further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"11 11","pages":"ofae639"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>The Long and Winding Road</i>: Three-year Mortality Following Prescription of Multidrug Antibiotic Treatment for <i>Mycobacterium avium complex</i> Pulmonary Disease in United States Medicare Beneficiaries With Bronchiectasis.\",\"authors\":\"Cara D Varley, Jennifer H Ku, Emily Henkle, Luke Strnad, Kevin L Winthrop\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofae639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Although increased mortality has been reported among people with <i>Mycobacterium avium complex</i> pulmonary disease (MAC-PD), data are limited on survival associated with various antibiotic regimens used to treat MAC-PD. We conducted a comparative analysis of 3-year mortality in Medicare beneficiaries with bronchiectasis using various MAC-PD regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with bronchiectasis (01/2006-12/2014). We limited our cohort to new MAC-PD therapy users. MAC-PD therapy was defined as ≥60-day prescriptions for a macrolide plus ≥1 other MAC-PD antibiotic. Guideline-based therapy (GBT) included a macrolide, ethambutol, and/or rifamycin. Using Cox proportional hazard models, we calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for death up to 3 years after therapy start between the following groups: (1) 2007 GBT versus non-GBT; (2) 2020 GBT versus non-GBT; and (3) macrolide-ethambutol-rifamycin (3-drug) versus macrolide-ethambutol (2-drug).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 4820 new MAC-PD therapy users, of whom 866 (17.9%) were deceased within 3 years of therapy initiation. Of 3040 (63.1%) beneficiaries prescribed 2007 GBT, 472 (15.5%) were deceased by 3 years, compared to 394 (22.1%) of 1780 (36.9%) prescribed non-GBT (aHR 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], .72-.94). We observed a similar trend for 2020 GBT versus non-GBT (aHR 0.81; 95% CI, .70-.94]). Three-year-mortality was similar between those starting 3-drug versus 2-drug regimens (aHR 0.89; 95% CI, .74-1.08]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among Medicare new MAC-PD therapy users, 3-year-mortality was higher in those prescribed non-GBT regimens compared to GBT regimens. Whether this finding suggests improved efficacy of GBT and/or differential characteristic of those using non-GBT regimens deserves further study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"11 11\",\"pages\":\"ofae639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584409/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae639\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae639","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Long and Winding Road: Three-year Mortality Following Prescription of Multidrug Antibiotic Treatment for Mycobacterium avium complex Pulmonary Disease in United States Medicare Beneficiaries With Bronchiectasis.
Background/aims: Although increased mortality has been reported among people with Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD), data are limited on survival associated with various antibiotic regimens used to treat MAC-PD. We conducted a comparative analysis of 3-year mortality in Medicare beneficiaries with bronchiectasis using various MAC-PD regimens.
Methods: We included Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with bronchiectasis (01/2006-12/2014). We limited our cohort to new MAC-PD therapy users. MAC-PD therapy was defined as ≥60-day prescriptions for a macrolide plus ≥1 other MAC-PD antibiotic. Guideline-based therapy (GBT) included a macrolide, ethambutol, and/or rifamycin. Using Cox proportional hazard models, we calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for death up to 3 years after therapy start between the following groups: (1) 2007 GBT versus non-GBT; (2) 2020 GBT versus non-GBT; and (3) macrolide-ethambutol-rifamycin (3-drug) versus macrolide-ethambutol (2-drug).
Results: We identified 4820 new MAC-PD therapy users, of whom 866 (17.9%) were deceased within 3 years of therapy initiation. Of 3040 (63.1%) beneficiaries prescribed 2007 GBT, 472 (15.5%) were deceased by 3 years, compared to 394 (22.1%) of 1780 (36.9%) prescribed non-GBT (aHR 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], .72-.94). We observed a similar trend for 2020 GBT versus non-GBT (aHR 0.81; 95% CI, .70-.94]). Three-year-mortality was similar between those starting 3-drug versus 2-drug regimens (aHR 0.89; 95% CI, .74-1.08]).
Conclusions: Among Medicare new MAC-PD therapy users, 3-year-mortality was higher in those prescribed non-GBT regimens compared to GBT regimens. Whether this finding suggests improved efficacy of GBT and/or differential characteristic of those using non-GBT regimens deserves further study.
期刊介绍:
Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.