身体位置对健康成人口腔和鼻腔最大呼吸压力时呼吸肌电活动的影响:试点研究

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Lailane Saturnino da Silva, Rayane Grayce da Silva Vieira, Thiago Bezerra Wanderley E Lima, Vanessa Regiane Resqueti, Jordi Vilaro, Jessica Danielle Medeiros da Fonseca, Giane Amorim Ribeiro-Samora, Guilherme Augusto de Freitas Fregonezi
{"title":"身体位置对健康成人口腔和鼻腔最大呼吸压力时呼吸肌电活动的影响:试点研究","authors":"Lailane Saturnino da Silva, Rayane Grayce da Silva Vieira, Thiago Bezerra Wanderley E Lima, Vanessa Regiane Resqueti, Jordi Vilaro, Jessica Danielle Medeiros da Fonseca, Giane Amorim Ribeiro-Samora, Guilherme Augusto de Freitas Fregonezi","doi":"10.3390/jfmk9040241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: This study aimed to analyze the impact of seated, 45° inclined, and supine positions on respiratory muscle strength (Maximal Inspiratory Pressure-MIP, Maximal Expiratory Pressure-MEP, Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure-SNIP and Sniff Nasal Expiratory Pressure-SNEP) and the electrical activity of respiratory muscles in healthy adults. Ten healthy subjects were evaluated. <b>Methods</b>: Personal, anthropometric data (weight, height, BMI) and lung function (spirometry) were collected, followed by random assessments of inspiratory (MIP, SNIP) and expiratory (MEP, SNEP) muscle strength. Respiratory muscle strength maneuvers and surface electromyographic (sEMG) activity were assessed in sitting, 45° inclined, and supine positions. <b>Results</b>: present that MIP was statistically higher in the sitting position compared to the supine position (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and the 45° supine position (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with SNIP: <i>p</i> < 0.05 and SNEP: <i>p</i> < 0.05 as well. Intercostal muscle activity was higher during MIP, MEP, and SNEP maneuvers in the sitting position (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, rectus abdominis muscle activity was higher in this position during MIP and SNEP maneuvers. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results suggest there are significant differences in inspiratory pressures between positions, with the difference in activity muscle pattern. In conclusion, body position affected maximal respiratory pressures and influences EMG activation of specific respiratory muscles during MIP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Body Position on Electrical Activity of Respiratory Muscles During Mouth and Nasal Maximal Respiratory Pressure in Healthy Adults: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lailane Saturnino da Silva, Rayane Grayce da Silva Vieira, Thiago Bezerra Wanderley E Lima, Vanessa Regiane Resqueti, Jordi Vilaro, Jessica Danielle Medeiros da Fonseca, Giane Amorim Ribeiro-Samora, Guilherme Augusto de Freitas Fregonezi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jfmk9040241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: This study aimed to analyze the impact of seated, 45° inclined, and supine positions on respiratory muscle strength (Maximal Inspiratory Pressure-MIP, Maximal Expiratory Pressure-MEP, Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure-SNIP and Sniff Nasal Expiratory Pressure-SNEP) and the electrical activity of respiratory muscles in healthy adults. Ten healthy subjects were evaluated. <b>Methods</b>: Personal, anthropometric data (weight, height, BMI) and lung function (spirometry) were collected, followed by random assessments of inspiratory (MIP, SNIP) and expiratory (MEP, SNEP) muscle strength. Respiratory muscle strength maneuvers and surface electromyographic (sEMG) activity were assessed in sitting, 45° inclined, and supine positions. <b>Results</b>: present that MIP was statistically higher in the sitting position compared to the supine position (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and the 45° supine position (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with SNIP: <i>p</i> < 0.05 and SNEP: <i>p</i> < 0.05 as well. Intercostal muscle activity was higher during MIP, MEP, and SNEP maneuvers in the sitting position (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, rectus abdominis muscle activity was higher in this position during MIP and SNEP maneuvers. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results suggest there are significant differences in inspiratory pressures between positions, with the difference in activity muscle pattern. In conclusion, body position affected maximal respiratory pressures and influences EMG activation of specific respiratory muscles during MIP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9040241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9040241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在分析坐位、45°倾斜位和仰卧位对健康成年人呼吸肌力量(最大吸气压-MIP、最大呼气压-MEP、嗅鼻吸气压-SNIP 和嗅鼻呼气压-SNEP)和呼吸肌电活动的影响。对 10 名健康受试者进行了评估。评估方法收集个人、人体测量数据(体重、身高、体重指数)和肺功能(肺活量测定),然后随机评估吸气肌力(MIP、SNIP)和呼气肌力(MEP、SNEP)。在坐位、45°倾斜位和仰卧位时,对呼吸肌力动作和表面肌电图(sEMG)活动进行评估。结果:与仰卧位(P < 0.05)和 45°仰卧位(P < 0.05)相比,坐位时的 MIP 在统计学上更高,SNIP:P < 0.05 和 SNEP:P < 0.05。在坐位进行 MIP、MEP 和 SNEP 操作时,肋间肌活动较高(p < 0.05)。此外,在进行 MIP 和 SNEP 操作时,该体位的腹直肌活动较高。结论:结果表明,不同体位的吸气压力存在显著差异,肌肉活动模式也不同。总之,体位会影响最大呼吸压力,并影响 MIP 期间特定呼吸肌的肌电图激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Body Position on Electrical Activity of Respiratory Muscles During Mouth and Nasal Maximal Respiratory Pressure in Healthy Adults: A Pilot Study.

Background: This study aimed to analyze the impact of seated, 45° inclined, and supine positions on respiratory muscle strength (Maximal Inspiratory Pressure-MIP, Maximal Expiratory Pressure-MEP, Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure-SNIP and Sniff Nasal Expiratory Pressure-SNEP) and the electrical activity of respiratory muscles in healthy adults. Ten healthy subjects were evaluated. Methods: Personal, anthropometric data (weight, height, BMI) and lung function (spirometry) were collected, followed by random assessments of inspiratory (MIP, SNIP) and expiratory (MEP, SNEP) muscle strength. Respiratory muscle strength maneuvers and surface electromyographic (sEMG) activity were assessed in sitting, 45° inclined, and supine positions. Results: present that MIP was statistically higher in the sitting position compared to the supine position (p < 0.05) and the 45° supine position (p < 0.05), with SNIP: p < 0.05 and SNEP: p < 0.05 as well. Intercostal muscle activity was higher during MIP, MEP, and SNEP maneuvers in the sitting position (p < 0.05). Additionally, rectus abdominis muscle activity was higher in this position during MIP and SNEP maneuvers. Conclusions: The results suggest there are significant differences in inspiratory pressures between positions, with the difference in activity muscle pattern. In conclusion, body position affected maximal respiratory pressures and influences EMG activation of specific respiratory muscles during MIP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信