虚拟现实干预及其对阿尔茨海默氏症患者认知能力的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1177/13872877241299037
Vanessa Daudt Santos, Adriana Coelho Costa, Nelson Carvas Junior, François Jean Delaere, Sebàstien Serlet, Marcia Cristina Nascimento Dourado
{"title":"虚拟现实干预及其对阿尔茨海默氏症患者认知能力的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Vanessa Daudt Santos, Adriana Coelho Costa, Nelson Carvas Junior, François Jean Delaere, Sebàstien Serlet, Marcia Cristina Nascimento Dourado","doi":"10.1177/13872877241299037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurocognitive disorder in the world and impacts the individual's cognitive functions and functionality in the early stages of the condition. Virtual reality (VR) interventions can assist in non-pharmacological treatment in a more ecological way, positively impacting cognitive abilities. However, there are few studies on VR exclusively involving people with AD in randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of VR intervention on the cognitive functions of people with AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematically conducted search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE, BVS, Web of Science, and Scopus. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of VR and traditional cognitive interventions in people with AD. Methodologic quality was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and outcomes were calculated as risk ratios (for dichotomous outcomes) and mean differences (for continuous outcomes) with 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of three randomized controlled trials with 75 participants were included. An improvement in the performance of the VR group was observed in memory, especially when comparing the usual treatment [MD = 0.99; CI95%: 0.33; 1.66; I<sup>2 </sup>= 0%]. VR has little or no effect on participants' executive function [MD = 1.36; 95%CI: -1.12; 3.85; I<sup>2 </sup>= 0%] compared to the usual treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study results cautiously suggest, despite the small number of participants, that VR intervention may be a suitable memory treatment for individuals diagnosed with AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"68-80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual reality interventions and their effects on the cognition of individuals with Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Daudt Santos, Adriana Coelho Costa, Nelson Carvas Junior, François Jean Delaere, Sebàstien Serlet, Marcia Cristina Nascimento Dourado\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877241299037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurocognitive disorder in the world and impacts the individual's cognitive functions and functionality in the early stages of the condition. Virtual reality (VR) interventions can assist in non-pharmacological treatment in a more ecological way, positively impacting cognitive abilities. However, there are few studies on VR exclusively involving people with AD in randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of VR intervention on the cognitive functions of people with AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematically conducted search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE, BVS, Web of Science, and Scopus. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of VR and traditional cognitive interventions in people with AD. Methodologic quality was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and outcomes were calculated as risk ratios (for dichotomous outcomes) and mean differences (for continuous outcomes) with 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of three randomized controlled trials with 75 participants were included. An improvement in the performance of the VR group was observed in memory, especially when comparing the usual treatment [MD = 0.99; CI95%: 0.33; 1.66; I<sup>2 </sup>= 0%]. VR has little or no effect on participants' executive function [MD = 1.36; 95%CI: -1.12; 3.85; I<sup>2 </sup>= 0%] compared to the usual treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study results cautiously suggest, despite the small number of participants, that VR intervention may be a suitable memory treatment for individuals diagnosed with AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"68-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241299037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241299037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿尔茨海默病(AD)导致的痴呆症是世界上最普遍的神经认知障碍,在发病初期会影响患者的认知功能和机能。虚拟现实(VR)干预能以更生态的方式辅助非药物治疗,对认知能力产生积极影响。然而,在随机对照试验中,很少有专门针对注意力缺失症患者的虚拟现实研究:评估 VR 干预对注意力缺失症患者认知功能的影响:方法:在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、BVS、Web of Science 和 Scopus 中进行了系统检索。符合条件的研究均为比较 VR 和传统认知干预对注意力缺失症患者疗效的随机对照试验。研究方法的质量采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行评估,研究结果以风险比(二分法结果)和平均差(连续性结果)及 95% 置信区间进行计算:结果:共纳入了三项随机对照试验,共有 75 名参与者。观察发现,VR 组在记忆方面的表现有所改善,尤其是与常规治疗相比[MD = 0.99;CI95%:0.33;1.66;I2 = 0%]。与常规治疗相比,VR 对参与者的执行功能几乎没有影响 [MD = 1.36; 95%CI: -1.12; 3.85; I2 = 0%]:尽管参与人数较少,但我们的研究结果谨慎地表明,VR 干预可能是一种适合被诊断为注意力缺失症患者的记忆治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual reality interventions and their effects on the cognition of individuals with Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurocognitive disorder in the world and impacts the individual's cognitive functions and functionality in the early stages of the condition. Virtual reality (VR) interventions can assist in non-pharmacological treatment in a more ecological way, positively impacting cognitive abilities. However, there are few studies on VR exclusively involving people with AD in randomized controlled trials.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of VR intervention on the cognitive functions of people with AD.

Methods: A systematically conducted search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE, BVS, Web of Science, and Scopus. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of VR and traditional cognitive interventions in people with AD. Methodologic quality was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and outcomes were calculated as risk ratios (for dichotomous outcomes) and mean differences (for continuous outcomes) with 95% confidence interval.

Results: A total of three randomized controlled trials with 75 participants were included. An improvement in the performance of the VR group was observed in memory, especially when comparing the usual treatment [MD = 0.99; CI95%: 0.33; 1.66; I2 = 0%]. VR has little or no effect on participants' executive function [MD = 1.36; 95%CI: -1.12; 3.85; I2 = 0%] compared to the usual treatment.

Conclusions: Our study results cautiously suggest, despite the small number of participants, that VR intervention may be a suitable memory treatment for individuals diagnosed with AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信