Mayer Y. Rashtian MD, FHRS , James E. Ip MD, FHRS , Derek V. Exner MD, FHRS , Vivek Y. Reddy MD , Rahul N. Doshi MD, FHRS , Pascal Defaye MD , Robert C. Canby MD , Maria Grazia Bongiorni MD , Morio Shoda MD , Gerhard Hindricks MD , Jordan R. Nevo MS , David Ligon MS , Anu Bulusu MS , Reinoud E. Knops MD, PhD
{"title":"无引线起搏器系统中基于温度的速率响应","authors":"Mayer Y. Rashtian MD, FHRS , James E. Ip MD, FHRS , Derek V. Exner MD, FHRS , Vivek Y. Reddy MD , Rahul N. Doshi MD, FHRS , Pascal Defaye MD , Robert C. Canby MD , Maria Grazia Bongiorni MD , Morio Shoda MD , Gerhard Hindricks MD , Jordan R. Nevo MS , David Ligon MS , Anu Bulusu MS , Reinoud E. Knops MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A new dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (DR-LP) system, composed of 2 implantable devices in the right ventricle and right atrium, uses a less common temperature-based rate-response sensor. There is a need to understand the effectiveness of the rate response during exercise in both the ventricular (VR-LP) and atrial (AR-LP) devices.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to determine whether temperature-based rate-responsive pacing is proportional to metabolic workload during an exercise test in a leadless pacemaker system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>After 6 weeks of implantation, we administered a treadmill exercise protocol to eligible participants concurrently enrolled in the LEADLESS II–Phase 2 and Aveir DR i2i studies. Programmed settings were optimized after a prior 6-minute walk test. We evaluated the ventricular and atrial rate-response sensors in participants implanted with the VR-LP and DR-LP system, respectively. For each device, the normalized slopes of sensor-indicated rate vs metabolic workload were aggregated across all analyzable patients. If the mean slope’s 95% confidence interval (CI) fell within the prespecified 0.65 and 1.35 acceptance range, the rate response was considered proportional to metabolic demand.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventeen participants had a mean ventricular rate-response slope of 0.93 ± 0.29 (CI, 0.78–1.08), which fell within the acceptance criteria (<em>P</em> = .001). Twenty participants had a mean atrial rate-response slope of 0.91 ± 0.28 (CI, 0.78–1.05), also falling within the prespecified criteria (<em>P <</em> .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The temperature-based sensor in a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system was shown to be effective at modulating pacing rate in response to increased metabolic demand for right ventricular and atrial devices.</div></div><div><h3>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier</h3><div><span><span>NCT04559945</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (LEADLESS II–Phase 2 study) and <span><span>NCT05252702</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (Aveir DR i2i study)</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"22 6","pages":"Pages 1533-1540"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temperature-based rate response in a leadless pacemaker system\",\"authors\":\"Mayer Y. Rashtian MD, FHRS , James E. Ip MD, FHRS , Derek V. Exner MD, FHRS , Vivek Y. Reddy MD , Rahul N. Doshi MD, FHRS , Pascal Defaye MD , Robert C. Canby MD , Maria Grazia Bongiorni MD , Morio Shoda MD , Gerhard Hindricks MD , Jordan R. Nevo MS , David Ligon MS , Anu Bulusu MS , Reinoud E. Knops MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A new dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (DR-LP) system, composed of 2 implantable devices in the right ventricle and right atrium, uses a less common temperature-based rate-response sensor. There is a need to understand the effectiveness of the rate response during exercise in both the ventricular (VR-LP) and atrial (AR-LP) devices.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to determine whether temperature-based rate-responsive pacing is proportional to metabolic workload during an exercise test in a leadless pacemaker system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>After 6 weeks of implantation, we administered a treadmill exercise protocol to eligible participants concurrently enrolled in the LEADLESS II–Phase 2 and Aveir DR i2i studies. Programmed settings were optimized after a prior 6-minute walk test. We evaluated the ventricular and atrial rate-response sensors in participants implanted with the VR-LP and DR-LP system, respectively. For each device, the normalized slopes of sensor-indicated rate vs metabolic workload were aggregated across all analyzable patients. If the mean slope’s 95% confidence interval (CI) fell within the prespecified 0.65 and 1.35 acceptance range, the rate response was considered proportional to metabolic demand.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventeen participants had a mean ventricular rate-response slope of 0.93 ± 0.29 (CI, 0.78–1.08), which fell within the acceptance criteria (<em>P</em> = .001). Twenty participants had a mean atrial rate-response slope of 0.91 ± 0.28 (CI, 0.78–1.05), also falling within the prespecified criteria (<em>P <</em> .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The temperature-based sensor in a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system was shown to be effective at modulating pacing rate in response to increased metabolic demand for right ventricular and atrial devices.</div></div><div><h3>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier</h3><div><span><span>NCT04559945</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (LEADLESS II–Phase 2 study) and <span><span>NCT05252702</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (Aveir DR i2i study)</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"volume\":\"22 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1533-1540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527124036154\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527124036154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Temperature-based rate response in a leadless pacemaker system
Background
A new dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (DR-LP) system, composed of 2 implantable devices in the right ventricle and right atrium, uses a less common temperature-based rate-response sensor. There is a need to understand the effectiveness of the rate response during exercise in both the ventricular (VR-LP) and atrial (AR-LP) devices.
Objective
We sought to determine whether temperature-based rate-responsive pacing is proportional to metabolic workload during an exercise test in a leadless pacemaker system.
Methods
After 6 weeks of implantation, we administered a treadmill exercise protocol to eligible participants concurrently enrolled in the LEADLESS II–Phase 2 and Aveir DR i2i studies. Programmed settings were optimized after a prior 6-minute walk test. We evaluated the ventricular and atrial rate-response sensors in participants implanted with the VR-LP and DR-LP system, respectively. For each device, the normalized slopes of sensor-indicated rate vs metabolic workload were aggregated across all analyzable patients. If the mean slope’s 95% confidence interval (CI) fell within the prespecified 0.65 and 1.35 acceptance range, the rate response was considered proportional to metabolic demand.
Results
Seventeen participants had a mean ventricular rate-response slope of 0.93 ± 0.29 (CI, 0.78–1.08), which fell within the acceptance criteria (P = .001). Twenty participants had a mean atrial rate-response slope of 0.91 ± 0.28 (CI, 0.78–1.05), also falling within the prespecified criteria (P < .001).
Conclusion
The temperature-based sensor in a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system was shown to be effective at modulating pacing rate in response to increased metabolic demand for right ventricular and atrial devices.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier
NCT04559945 (LEADLESS II–Phase 2 study) and NCT05252702 (Aveir DR i2i study)
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.