使用美托咪定、咪达唑仑和丁吗啡诺双管齐下进行平衡麻醉,既能为兔子提供合适的麻醉深度,又能减少组织损伤。

IF 2.2 4区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Risa Iwanaga, Kanako Sumi, Chizuko Kodama, Munekatsu Ita, Mohammad Ibrahim Qasimi, Jun Tamura, Ko Nakanishi, Yasuhiro Yoshida, Masami Morimatsu, Kayoko Matsumura, Teppei Nakamura
{"title":"使用美托咪定、咪达唑仑和丁吗啡诺双管齐下进行平衡麻醉,既能为兔子提供合适的麻醉深度,又能减少组织损伤。","authors":"Risa Iwanaga, Kanako Sumi, Chizuko Kodama, Munekatsu Ita, Mohammad Ibrahim Qasimi, Jun Tamura, Ko Nakanishi, Yasuhiro Yoshida, Masami Morimatsu, Kayoko Matsumura, Teppei Nakamura","doi":"10.1538/expanim.24-0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol (MMB) anesthesia is the preferred choice for rodents but requires excess volume of intramuscular injection in rabbits, which can lead to muscular damage. This study aimed to evaluate a dual-route MMB administration via the intravenous and subcutaneous routes in rabbits. MMB was administered to male Kbs:JW rabbits with an intravenous injection of 0.2 mL/kg followed by a subcutaneous injection of 0.8 mL/kg, totaling 0.2 mg/kg medetomidine, 2.0 mg/kg midazolam, and 2.0 mg/kg butorphanol. We compared the anesthetic effects of this dual-route method with those of intramuscular administration. The dual-route method resulted in a shorter induction time and similar anesthetic duration compared with those of the intramuscular route. While it induced a temporary decrease in body temperature within 30 min post-injection, other vital signs, such as respiration rate, heart rate, and O<sub>2</sub> saturation, remained similar. Notably, unlike intramuscular administration, dual-route administration did not increase tissue injury marker levels. This dual-route MMB administration provided sufficient anesthetic depth during surgery, eliminating pain reflexes. Double-dose administration extended anesthetic duration but resulted in rare fatalities, indicating room for protocol improvement. In conclusion, the novel anesthetic method is preferable for injectable anesthesia in rabbits, providing rapid induction and sufficient anesthetic duration, while potentially minimizing muscle injury. This technique may be beneficial for both laboratory and companion animals and significantly enhance animal welfare in anesthesia by reducing the pain associated with injectable anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12102,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Animals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual-route administration of balanced anesthesia using medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol provides both suitable anesthetic depth and reduced tissue injury in rabbits.\",\"authors\":\"Risa Iwanaga, Kanako Sumi, Chizuko Kodama, Munekatsu Ita, Mohammad Ibrahim Qasimi, Jun Tamura, Ko Nakanishi, Yasuhiro Yoshida, Masami Morimatsu, Kayoko Matsumura, Teppei Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1538/expanim.24-0132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol (MMB) anesthesia is the preferred choice for rodents but requires excess volume of intramuscular injection in rabbits, which can lead to muscular damage. This study aimed to evaluate a dual-route MMB administration via the intravenous and subcutaneous routes in rabbits. MMB was administered to male Kbs:JW rabbits with an intravenous injection of 0.2 mL/kg followed by a subcutaneous injection of 0.8 mL/kg, totaling 0.2 mg/kg medetomidine, 2.0 mg/kg midazolam, and 2.0 mg/kg butorphanol. We compared the anesthetic effects of this dual-route method with those of intramuscular administration. The dual-route method resulted in a shorter induction time and similar anesthetic duration compared with those of the intramuscular route. While it induced a temporary decrease in body temperature within 30 min post-injection, other vital signs, such as respiration rate, heart rate, and O<sub>2</sub> saturation, remained similar. Notably, unlike intramuscular administration, dual-route administration did not increase tissue injury marker levels. This dual-route MMB administration provided sufficient anesthetic depth during surgery, eliminating pain reflexes. Double-dose administration extended anesthetic duration but resulted in rare fatalities, indicating room for protocol improvement. In conclusion, the novel anesthetic method is preferable for injectable anesthesia in rabbits, providing rapid induction and sufficient anesthetic duration, while potentially minimizing muscle injury. This technique may be beneficial for both laboratory and companion animals and significantly enhance animal welfare in anesthesia by reducing the pain associated with injectable anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Animals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Animals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.24-0132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.24-0132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美托咪定、咪达唑仑和丁羟吗啡(MMB)麻醉是啮齿类动物的首选麻醉方法,但在兔子体内需要过量的肌肉注射,这可能会导致肌肉损伤。本研究旨在评估通过静脉注射和皮下注射双途径给兔子注射 MMB 的效果。雄性 Kbs:JW 家兔静脉注射 0.2 mL/kg,然后皮下注射 0.8 mL/kg,共注射了 0.2 mg/kg 美托咪定、2.0 mg/kg 咪达唑仑和 2.0 mg/kg 丁吗啡诺。我们比较了这种双途径方法与肌肉注射法的麻醉效果。与肌肉注射法相比,双途径法的诱导时间更短,麻醉持续时间相似。虽然注射后 30 分钟内体温会暂时下降,但呼吸频率、心率和氧气饱和度等其他生命体征却保持相似。值得注意的是,与肌肉注射不同,双途径给药不会增加组织损伤标志物水平。这种双途径 MMB 给药在手术过程中提供了足够的麻醉深度,消除了疼痛反射。双剂量给药延长了麻醉持续时间,但也导致了罕见的死亡病例,这表明方案还有改进的余地。总之,新型麻醉方法是兔子注射麻醉的首选方法,它能快速诱导并提供足够的麻醉持续时间,同时可能最大限度地减少肌肉损伤。这项技术可能对实验室动物和伴侣动物都有益处,并能减少注射麻醉带来的疼痛,从而大大提高动物在麻醉中的福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual-route administration of balanced anesthesia using medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol provides both suitable anesthetic depth and reduced tissue injury in rabbits.

Medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol (MMB) anesthesia is the preferred choice for rodents but requires excess volume of intramuscular injection in rabbits, which can lead to muscular damage. This study aimed to evaluate a dual-route MMB administration via the intravenous and subcutaneous routes in rabbits. MMB was administered to male Kbs:JW rabbits with an intravenous injection of 0.2 mL/kg followed by a subcutaneous injection of 0.8 mL/kg, totaling 0.2 mg/kg medetomidine, 2.0 mg/kg midazolam, and 2.0 mg/kg butorphanol. We compared the anesthetic effects of this dual-route method with those of intramuscular administration. The dual-route method resulted in a shorter induction time and similar anesthetic duration compared with those of the intramuscular route. While it induced a temporary decrease in body temperature within 30 min post-injection, other vital signs, such as respiration rate, heart rate, and O2 saturation, remained similar. Notably, unlike intramuscular administration, dual-route administration did not increase tissue injury marker levels. This dual-route MMB administration provided sufficient anesthetic depth during surgery, eliminating pain reflexes. Double-dose administration extended anesthetic duration but resulted in rare fatalities, indicating room for protocol improvement. In conclusion, the novel anesthetic method is preferable for injectable anesthesia in rabbits, providing rapid induction and sufficient anesthetic duration, while potentially minimizing muscle injury. This technique may be beneficial for both laboratory and companion animals and significantly enhance animal welfare in anesthesia by reducing the pain associated with injectable anesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Animals
Experimental Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
2
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of this international journal is to accelerate progress in laboratory animal experimentation and disseminate relevant information in related areas through publication of peer reviewed Original papers and Review articles. The journal covers basic to applied biomedical research centering around use of experimental animals and also covers topics related to experimental animals such as technology, management, and animal welfare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信