{"title":"中国根除幽门螺旋杆菌的 10 天与 14 天 Vonoprazan-阿莫西林大剂量双重疗法:一项多中心、开放标签、随机研究。","authors":"Aiping Lin, Zhihui Lin, Yijuan Liu, Shuo Chen, Yanfeng Shao, Feng Qiu, Zhongqin Xiao, Zhangkun Xu, Longqun Chen, Lianghuo Chen, Weixing Lin, Yongfu Wang, Zhonghua Huang, Zhenqun Lin, Xueping Huang","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Only a few studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of different durations of vonoprazan and amoxicillin (VA) high-dose dual therapy for the eradication of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i>. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 10 days <i>versus</i> 14 days of VA high-dose dual therapy for <i>H. pylori</i> eradication.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study was conducted in 14 centers in China. A total of 250 patients infected with <i>H. pylori</i> were randomly assigned to Group VA-10 or VA-14. Both groups received the VA dual therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily). The primary endpoint was the <i>H. pylori</i> eradication rate. Secondary endpoints included adverse events and patient compliance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Group VA-10 achieved eradication rates of 89.60%, 91.06%, and 91.67% as determined by the intention-to-treat (ITT), modified intention-to-treat (MITT), and per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. The eradication rates were similar to those in Group VA-14: 91.20%, 93.44%, and 93.39%. The difference and 90% confidence interval boundary −1.60% (−7.73% to 4.53%) in the ITT analysis, −2.39% (−8.00% to 3.23%) in the MITT analysis, and −1.72% (−7.29% to 3.85%) in the PP analysis were greater than the predefined noninferiority margin of −10%, establishing a noninferiority of Group VA-10 <i>versus</i> Group VA-14 (noninferiority <i>P</i> = 0.001 in ITT analysis, <i>P</i> < 0.001 in MITT analysis, and <i>P</i> < 0.001 in PP analysis, respectively). No significant differences were observed in adverse events between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Ten-day VA dual therapy achieves comparable efficacy and safety to the 14-day regimen in Chinese population, providing patients with greater convenience and economic benefits.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"39 12","pages":"2645-2653"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten-day versus 14-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin high-dose dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in China: A multicenter, open-label, randomized study\",\"authors\":\"Aiping Lin, Zhihui Lin, Yijuan Liu, Shuo Chen, Yanfeng Shao, Feng Qiu, Zhongqin Xiao, Zhangkun Xu, Longqun Chen, Lianghuo Chen, Weixing Lin, Yongfu Wang, Zhonghua Huang, Zhenqun Lin, Xueping Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgh.16761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Only a few studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of different durations of vonoprazan and amoxicillin (VA) high-dose dual therapy for the eradication of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i>. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 10 days <i>versus</i> 14 days of VA high-dose dual therapy for <i>H. pylori</i> eradication.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study was conducted in 14 centers in China. A total of 250 patients infected with <i>H. pylori</i> were randomly assigned to Group VA-10 or VA-14. Both groups received the VA dual therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily). The primary endpoint was the <i>H. pylori</i> eradication rate. Secondary endpoints included adverse events and patient compliance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Group VA-10 achieved eradication rates of 89.60%, 91.06%, and 91.67% as determined by the intention-to-treat (ITT), modified intention-to-treat (MITT), and per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. The eradication rates were similar to those in Group VA-14: 91.20%, 93.44%, and 93.39%. The difference and 90% confidence interval boundary −1.60% (−7.73% to 4.53%) in the ITT analysis, −2.39% (−8.00% to 3.23%) in the MITT analysis, and −1.72% (−7.29% to 3.85%) in the PP analysis were greater than the predefined noninferiority margin of −10%, establishing a noninferiority of Group VA-10 <i>versus</i> Group VA-14 (noninferiority <i>P</i> = 0.001 in ITT analysis, <i>P</i> < 0.001 in MITT analysis, and <i>P</i> < 0.001 in PP analysis, respectively). No significant differences were observed in adverse events between the two groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ten-day VA dual therapy achieves comparable efficacy and safety to the 14-day regimen in Chinese population, providing patients with greater convenience and economic benefits.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"39 12\",\"pages\":\"2645-2653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgh.16761\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgh.16761","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:只有少数研究调查了不同疗程的冯诺普拉赞和阿莫西林(VA)大剂量双重疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效和安全性。我们旨在比较 10 天与 14 天 VA 大剂量双重疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效和安全性:本研究在中国的 14 个中心进行。共有250名幽门螺杆菌感染者被随机分配到VA-10组或VA-14组。两组均接受 VA 双联疗法(沃诺普赞 20 毫克,每日两次;阿莫西林 1000 毫克,每日三次)。主要终点是幽门螺杆菌根除率。次要终点包括不良事件和患者依从性:根据意向治疗(ITT)、改良意向治疗(MITT)和每方案(PP)分析,VA-10 组的根除率分别为 89.60%、91.06% 和 91.67%。根除率与 VA-14 组相似:91.20%、93.44% 和 93.39%。ITT分析中的差值和90%置信区间边界为-1.60%(-7.73%至4.53%),MITT分析中的差值和90%置信区间边界为-2.39%(-8.00%至3.23%),PP分析中的差值和90%置信区间边界为-1.72%(-7.29%至3.85%),均大于预先设定的非劣效性边际-10%,从而确定了VA-10组与VA-14组的非劣效性(ITT分析中的非劣效性P = 0.001,P结论:在中国人群中,10 天 VA 双联疗法的疗效和安全性与 14 天疗法相当,为患者提供了更大的便利和经济效益。
Ten-day versus 14-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin high-dose dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in China: A multicenter, open-label, randomized study
Background and Aim
Only a few studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of different durations of vonoprazan and amoxicillin (VA) high-dose dual therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 10 days versus 14 days of VA high-dose dual therapy for H. pylori eradication.
Methods
This study was conducted in 14 centers in China. A total of 250 patients infected with H. pylori were randomly assigned to Group VA-10 or VA-14. Both groups received the VA dual therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily). The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate. Secondary endpoints included adverse events and patient compliance.
Results
Group VA-10 achieved eradication rates of 89.60%, 91.06%, and 91.67% as determined by the intention-to-treat (ITT), modified intention-to-treat (MITT), and per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. The eradication rates were similar to those in Group VA-14: 91.20%, 93.44%, and 93.39%. The difference and 90% confidence interval boundary −1.60% (−7.73% to 4.53%) in the ITT analysis, −2.39% (−8.00% to 3.23%) in the MITT analysis, and −1.72% (−7.29% to 3.85%) in the PP analysis were greater than the predefined noninferiority margin of −10%, establishing a noninferiority of Group VA-10 versus Group VA-14 (noninferiority P = 0.001 in ITT analysis, P < 0.001 in MITT analysis, and P < 0.001 in PP analysis, respectively). No significant differences were observed in adverse events between the two groups.
Conclusions
Ten-day VA dual therapy achieves comparable efficacy and safety to the 14-day regimen in Chinese population, providing patients with greater convenience and economic benefits.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.