入住重症监护病房的重症儿童诊断不确定性:一项多中心研究。

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006511
Christina L Cifra, Jason W Custer, Craig M Smith, Kristen A Smith, Dayanand N Bagdure, Jodi Bloxham, Emily Goldhar, Stephen M Gorga, Elizabeth M Hoppe, Christina D Miller, Max Pizzo, Sonali Ramesh, Joseph Riffe, Katharine Robb, Shari L Simone, Haley D Stoll, Jamie Ann Tumulty, Stephanie E Wall, Katie K Wolfe, Linder Wendt, Patrick Ten Eyck, Christopher P Landrigan, Jeffrey D Dawson, Heather Schacht Reisinger, Hardeep Singh, Loreen A Herwaldt
{"title":"入住重症监护病房的重症儿童诊断不确定性:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Christina L Cifra, Jason W Custer, Craig M Smith, Kristen A Smith, Dayanand N Bagdure, Jodi Bloxham, Emily Goldhar, Stephen M Gorga, Elizabeth M Hoppe, Christina D Miller, Max Pizzo, Sonali Ramesh, Joseph Riffe, Katharine Robb, Shari L Simone, Haley D Stoll, Jamie Ann Tumulty, Stephanie E Wall, Katie K Wolfe, Linder Wendt, Patrick Ten Eyck, Christopher P Landrigan, Jeffrey D Dawson, Heather Schacht Reisinger, Hardeep Singh, Loreen A Herwaldt","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify the prevalence of and factors associated with diagnostic uncertainty when critically ill children are admitted to the PICU. Understanding diagnostic uncertainty is necessary to develop effective strategies to reduce diagnostic errors in the PICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter retrospective cohort study with structured medical record review by trained clinicians using a standardized instrument to identify diagnostic uncertainty in narrative clinical notes. Diagnoses and diagnostic uncertainty were compared across time from PICU admission to hospital discharge. Generalized linear mixed models were used to determine patient, clinician, and encounter characteristics associated with diagnostic uncertainty at PICU admission.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four academic tertiary-referral PICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Eight hundred eighty-two randomly selected patients 0-18 years old who were nonelectively admitted to participating PICUs.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>PICU admission notes for 228 of 882 patients (25.9%) indicated diagnostic uncertainty. Patients with uncertainty decreased over time but 58 (6.6%) had remaining diagnostic uncertainty at hospital discharge. Multivariable analysis showed that diagnostic uncertainty was significantly associated with off hours admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.52; p = 0.037), greater severity of illness (OR, 1.04; p = 0.025), an atypical presentation (OR, 2.14; p = 0.046), diagnostic discordance at admission between attending intensivists and resident physicians/advanced practice providers (OR, 3.62; p < 0.001), and having a neurologic primary diagnosis (OR, 1.87; p = 0.03). Older patients (OR, 0.96; p = 0.014) and those with a respiratory (OR, 0.58; p = 0.009) or trauma primary diagnosis (OR, 0.08; p < 0.001) were less likely to have diagnostic uncertainty. There were no significant associations between diagnostic uncertainty and attending intensivists' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnostic uncertainty at PICU admission was common and was associated with off hours admission, severe illness, atypical presentation, diagnostic discordance between clinicians, and a neurologic primary diagnosis. Further study on the recognition and management of diagnostic uncertainty is needed to inform interventions to improve diagnosis among critically ill children.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e294-e307"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Uncertainty Among Critically Ill Children Admitted to the PICU: A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Christina L Cifra, Jason W Custer, Craig M Smith, Kristen A Smith, Dayanand N Bagdure, Jodi Bloxham, Emily Goldhar, Stephen M Gorga, Elizabeth M Hoppe, Christina D Miller, Max Pizzo, Sonali Ramesh, Joseph Riffe, Katharine Robb, Shari L Simone, Haley D Stoll, Jamie Ann Tumulty, Stephanie E Wall, Katie K Wolfe, Linder Wendt, Patrick Ten Eyck, Christopher P Landrigan, Jeffrey D Dawson, Heather Schacht Reisinger, Hardeep Singh, Loreen A Herwaldt\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify the prevalence of and factors associated with diagnostic uncertainty when critically ill children are admitted to the PICU. Understanding diagnostic uncertainty is necessary to develop effective strategies to reduce diagnostic errors in the PICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter retrospective cohort study with structured medical record review by trained clinicians using a standardized instrument to identify diagnostic uncertainty in narrative clinical notes. Diagnoses and diagnostic uncertainty were compared across time from PICU admission to hospital discharge. Generalized linear mixed models were used to determine patient, clinician, and encounter characteristics associated with diagnostic uncertainty at PICU admission.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four academic tertiary-referral PICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Eight hundred eighty-two randomly selected patients 0-18 years old who were nonelectively admitted to participating PICUs.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>PICU admission notes for 228 of 882 patients (25.9%) indicated diagnostic uncertainty. Patients with uncertainty decreased over time but 58 (6.6%) had remaining diagnostic uncertainty at hospital discharge. Multivariable analysis showed that diagnostic uncertainty was significantly associated with off hours admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.52; p = 0.037), greater severity of illness (OR, 1.04; p = 0.025), an atypical presentation (OR, 2.14; p = 0.046), diagnostic discordance at admission between attending intensivists and resident physicians/advanced practice providers (OR, 3.62; p < 0.001), and having a neurologic primary diagnosis (OR, 1.87; p = 0.03). Older patients (OR, 0.96; p = 0.014) and those with a respiratory (OR, 0.58; p = 0.009) or trauma primary diagnosis (OR, 0.08; p < 0.001) were less likely to have diagnostic uncertainty. There were no significant associations between diagnostic uncertainty and attending intensivists' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnostic uncertainty at PICU admission was common and was associated with off hours admission, severe illness, atypical presentation, diagnostic discordance between clinicians, and a neurologic primary diagnosis. Further study on the recognition and management of diagnostic uncertainty is needed to inform interventions to improve diagnosis among critically ill children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e294-e307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006511\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006511","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在确定重症儿童入住重症监护病房时诊断不确定性的发生率及相关因素。了解诊断不确定性对于制定有效策略以减少 PICU 诊断错误非常必要:设计:多中心回顾性队列研究,由经过培训的临床医生使用标准化工具对病历进行结构化审查,以确定临床记录中诊断的不确定性。比较从 PICU 入院到出院期间的诊断和诊断不确定性。采用广义线性混合模型确定与 PICU 入院时诊断不确定性相关的患者、临床医生和病例特征:四所学术性三级转诊 PICU:干预措施:无:无干预措施:882名患者中有228名(25.9%)的PICU入院记录显示诊断不确定。随着时间的推移,诊断不确定的患者逐渐减少,但仍有 58 名患者(6.6%)在出院时诊断仍不确定。多变量分析显示,诊断不确定性与非小时入院(几率比 [OR],1.52;P = 0.037)、病情严重程度(OR,1.04;P = 0.025)、非典型表现(OR,2.14;p = 0.046)、入院时主治重症监护医师与住院医师/高级医师的诊断不一致(OR,3.62;p < 0.001)以及有神经系统的主要诊断(OR,1.87;p = 0.03)。年龄较大的患者(OR,0.96;p = 0.014)和主要诊断为呼吸系统(OR,0.58;p = 0.009)或创伤(OR,0.08;p < 0.001)的患者出现诊断不确定性的可能性较低。诊断不确定性与主治重症监护医师的特征无明显关联:结论:PICU入院时诊断不确定的情况很常见,并且与非小时入院、病情严重、表现不典型、临床医生之间诊断不一致以及主要诊断为神经系统疾病有关。需要进一步研究诊断不确定性的识别和管理,以便为改善危重症儿童诊断的干预措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Uncertainty Among Critically Ill Children Admitted to the PICU: A Multicenter Study.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify the prevalence of and factors associated with diagnostic uncertainty when critically ill children are admitted to the PICU. Understanding diagnostic uncertainty is necessary to develop effective strategies to reduce diagnostic errors in the PICU.

Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study with structured medical record review by trained clinicians using a standardized instrument to identify diagnostic uncertainty in narrative clinical notes. Diagnoses and diagnostic uncertainty were compared across time from PICU admission to hospital discharge. Generalized linear mixed models were used to determine patient, clinician, and encounter characteristics associated with diagnostic uncertainty at PICU admission.

Setting: Four academic tertiary-referral PICUs.

Patients: Eight hundred eighty-two randomly selected patients 0-18 years old who were nonelectively admitted to participating PICUs.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: PICU admission notes for 228 of 882 patients (25.9%) indicated diagnostic uncertainty. Patients with uncertainty decreased over time but 58 (6.6%) had remaining diagnostic uncertainty at hospital discharge. Multivariable analysis showed that diagnostic uncertainty was significantly associated with off hours admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.52; p = 0.037), greater severity of illness (OR, 1.04; p = 0.025), an atypical presentation (OR, 2.14; p = 0.046), diagnostic discordance at admission between attending intensivists and resident physicians/advanced practice providers (OR, 3.62; p < 0.001), and having a neurologic primary diagnosis (OR, 1.87; p = 0.03). Older patients (OR, 0.96; p = 0.014) and those with a respiratory (OR, 0.58; p = 0.009) or trauma primary diagnosis (OR, 0.08; p < 0.001) were less likely to have diagnostic uncertainty. There were no significant associations between diagnostic uncertainty and attending intensivists' characteristics.

Conclusions: Diagnostic uncertainty at PICU admission was common and was associated with off hours admission, severe illness, atypical presentation, diagnostic discordance between clinicians, and a neurologic primary diagnosis. Further study on the recognition and management of diagnostic uncertainty is needed to inform interventions to improve diagnosis among critically ill children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信