治疗失聪性中耳炎的内窥镜方法与显微镜方法。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Giannicola Iannella, Annalisa Pace, Antonio Greco, Armando De Virgilio, Lodovica Gatti, Antonino Maniaci, Jerome R Lechien, Rémi Hervochon, Ali Faramarzi, Quentin Mat, Maryana Cherkes, Matthias Koiner-Graupp, Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo, Luigi Angelo Vaira, Giuseppe Magliulo
{"title":"治疗失聪性中耳炎的内窥镜方法与显微镜方法。","authors":"Giannicola Iannella, Annalisa Pace, Antonio Greco, Armando De Virgilio, Lodovica Gatti, Antonino Maniaci, Jerome R Lechien, Rémi Hervochon, Ali Faramarzi, Quentin Mat, Maryana Cherkes, Matthias Koiner-Graupp, Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo, Luigi Angelo Vaira, Giuseppe Magliulo","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2424947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>endoscopic ear surgery in patients Chronic Otitis Media(COM) media with eardrum atelectasis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare the postoperative outcomes and audiological results of the endoscopic approach versus the microscopic approach for treatment of COM media with eardrum atelectasis, using a randomized prospective model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients were consecutively enrolled in the study and randomized into two groups: Group A 32 patients underwent canal wall up tympanoplasty (CWA); Group B 28 patients underwent tympanoplasty with an exclusive trans-meatal endoscopic approach. Audiological results and preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical difference emerged between distribution of middle ear atelectasis patients grade 3 and 4 between the two surgical groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The group B appeared to have shorter surgical times than group A (69.8 min vs. 88.9 min). The graft success rate was estimated in 90.6% and 92.8% in group A and B respectively, without statistical differences between groups (<i>p</i> = 1). The Overall success rate was therefore calculated in 87.5% and 92.8% for both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and significance: </strong>Endoscopic ear surgery could be a suitable approach for treating COM media with eardrum atelectasis with similar results compared with the Microscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic versus microscopic approach in the treatment of atelectatic otitis media.\",\"authors\":\"Giannicola Iannella, Annalisa Pace, Antonio Greco, Armando De Virgilio, Lodovica Gatti, Antonino Maniaci, Jerome R Lechien, Rémi Hervochon, Ali Faramarzi, Quentin Mat, Maryana Cherkes, Matthias Koiner-Graupp, Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo, Luigi Angelo Vaira, Giuseppe Magliulo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2024.2424947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>endoscopic ear surgery in patients Chronic Otitis Media(COM) media with eardrum atelectasis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare the postoperative outcomes and audiological results of the endoscopic approach versus the microscopic approach for treatment of COM media with eardrum atelectasis, using a randomized prospective model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients were consecutively enrolled in the study and randomized into two groups: Group A 32 patients underwent canal wall up tympanoplasty (CWA); Group B 28 patients underwent tympanoplasty with an exclusive trans-meatal endoscopic approach. Audiological results and preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical difference emerged between distribution of middle ear atelectasis patients grade 3 and 4 between the two surgical groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The group B appeared to have shorter surgical times than group A (69.8 min vs. 88.9 min). The graft success rate was estimated in 90.6% and 92.8% in group A and B respectively, without statistical differences between groups (<i>p</i> = 1). The Overall success rate was therefore calculated in 87.5% and 92.8% for both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and significance: </strong>Endoscopic ear surgery could be a suitable approach for treating COM media with eardrum atelectasis with similar results compared with the Microscopic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2424947\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2424947","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性中耳炎(COM)伴鼓膜偏流患者的耳内镜手术。目的:采用随机前瞻性模型,比较内镜方法与显微镜方法治疗COM伴鼓膜偏流的术后效果和听力结果:该研究连续招募了 60 名患者,并将其随机分为两组:A 组 32 名患者接受了鼓室壁上提鼓室成形术(CWA);B 组 28 名患者接受了鼓室成形术,该术式完全采用经产道内窥镜方法。对听力结果以及术前、术中和术后效果进行了评估:结果:两组手术中3级和4级中耳积液患者的分布无统计学差异(P>0.05)。B 组的手术时间似乎比 A 组短(69.8 分钟对 88.9 分钟)。据估计,A 组和 B 组的移植物成功率分别为 90.6% 和 92.8%,组间无统计学差异(P = 1)。因此,两组的总体成功率分别为 87.5% 和 92.8%:结论和意义:内窥镜耳科手术是治疗 COM 中耳炎的一种合适方法,与显微镜手术相比效果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic versus microscopic approach in the treatment of atelectatic otitis media.

Background: endoscopic ear surgery in patients Chronic Otitis Media(COM) media with eardrum atelectasis.

Objective: to compare the postoperative outcomes and audiological results of the endoscopic approach versus the microscopic approach for treatment of COM media with eardrum atelectasis, using a randomized prospective model.

Methods: Sixty patients were consecutively enrolled in the study and randomized into two groups: Group A 32 patients underwent canal wall up tympanoplasty (CWA); Group B 28 patients underwent tympanoplasty with an exclusive trans-meatal endoscopic approach. Audiological results and preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

Results: No statistical difference emerged between distribution of middle ear atelectasis patients grade 3 and 4 between the two surgical groups (p > 0.05). The group B appeared to have shorter surgical times than group A (69.8 min vs. 88.9 min). The graft success rate was estimated in 90.6% and 92.8% in group A and B respectively, without statistical differences between groups (p = 1). The Overall success rate was therefore calculated in 87.5% and 92.8% for both groups.

Conclusion and significance: Endoscopic ear surgery could be a suitable approach for treating COM media with eardrum atelectasis with similar results compared with the Microscopic surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信