全球可持续商品治理中的问责政治:机构竞争与融合的困境

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Kate Macdonald,  Bahruddin, Annisa Sabrina Hartoto, Carla Unger, Paul Cisneros, Deborah Delgado Pugley, Damaris Herreras Salazar, Poppy Sulistyaning Winanti, Nanang Indra Kurniawan
{"title":"全球可持续商品治理中的问责政治:机构竞争与融合的困境","authors":"Kate Macdonald,&nbsp; Bahruddin,&nbsp;Annisa Sabrina Hartoto,&nbsp;Carla Unger,&nbsp;Paul Cisneros,&nbsp;Deborah Delgado Pugley,&nbsp;Damaris Herreras Salazar,&nbsp;Poppy Sulistyaning Winanti,&nbsp;Nanang Indra Kurniawan","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The accountability of market-driven sustainability governance has long been controversial, reflecting the deeply political processes through which accountability contests shape governance transformations. Drawing on illustrative examples from internationally traded agro-commodity sectors in the critical case of Indonesia, this paper examines the contested processes of accountability that have accompanied a recent period of institutional change in sustainability governance. Amidst rising critiques of global certification, there has been a parallel expansion of governance approaches that prioritise capability development over regulatory enforcement and engage more intensively with governments in commodity-producing countries. As alternative governance models gain influence, tensions between competing governance stakeholders and agendas are mirrored and amplified through parallel accountability contests, in which distributional conflicts between global and local stakeholders are intensified by pressures to adopt contentious systems of compliance verification. While accountability gaps associated with contrasting institutional models produce strong pressures for partial institutional convergence, such convergence coexists with new forms of institutional fragmentation, as competition between global and national certification expands to encompass competition with localised capacity-building and jurisdictional approaches. Analysis highlights the often-neglected role of accountability politics in shaping institutional change, while raising pressing questions about the distributional implications of contemporary shifts away from global certification governance models.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"15 5","pages":"838-854"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.13426","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The politics of accountability in global sustainable commodity governance: Dilemmas of institutional competition and convergence\",\"authors\":\"Kate Macdonald,&nbsp; Bahruddin,&nbsp;Annisa Sabrina Hartoto,&nbsp;Carla Unger,&nbsp;Paul Cisneros,&nbsp;Deborah Delgado Pugley,&nbsp;Damaris Herreras Salazar,&nbsp;Poppy Sulistyaning Winanti,&nbsp;Nanang Indra Kurniawan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-5899.13426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The accountability of market-driven sustainability governance has long been controversial, reflecting the deeply political processes through which accountability contests shape governance transformations. Drawing on illustrative examples from internationally traded agro-commodity sectors in the critical case of Indonesia, this paper examines the contested processes of accountability that have accompanied a recent period of institutional change in sustainability governance. Amidst rising critiques of global certification, there has been a parallel expansion of governance approaches that prioritise capability development over regulatory enforcement and engage more intensively with governments in commodity-producing countries. As alternative governance models gain influence, tensions between competing governance stakeholders and agendas are mirrored and amplified through parallel accountability contests, in which distributional conflicts between global and local stakeholders are intensified by pressures to adopt contentious systems of compliance verification. While accountability gaps associated with contrasting institutional models produce strong pressures for partial institutional convergence, such convergence coexists with new forms of institutional fragmentation, as competition between global and national certification expands to encompass competition with localised capacity-building and jurisdictional approaches. Analysis highlights the often-neglected role of accountability politics in shaping institutional change, while raising pressing questions about the distributional implications of contemporary shifts away from global certification governance models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Policy\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"838-854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.13426\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13426\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13426","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以市场为导向的可持续性治理的问责制长期以来一直备受争议,这反映了问责制竞争塑造治理变革的深刻政治过程。本文以印度尼西亚国际贸易农业商品部门为例,探讨了伴随着近期可持续发展治理的制度变革而出现的有争议的问责过程。在对全球认证的批评声浪日益高涨的同时,以能力发展为优先而非监管执行的治理方法也在不断扩展,并与商品生产国的政府进行了更深入的合作。随着替代性治理模式的影响力不断扩大,相互竞争的治理利益相关者和议程之间的紧张关系通过并行的问责竞赛得到反映和放大,在这种竞赛中,全球和地方利益相关者之间的分配冲突因采用有争议的合规性验证系统的压力而加剧。虽然与截然不同的制度模式相关的问责制差距产生了部分制度趋同的强大压力,但这种趋同与新形式的制度分裂并存,因为全球和国家认证之间的竞争扩大到包括与地方化能力建设和管辖方法的竞争。分析凸显了问责政治在形成制度变革中经常被忽视的作用,同时也提出了关于当代全球认证治理模式转变对分配的影响的紧迫问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The politics of accountability in global sustainable commodity governance: Dilemmas of institutional competition and convergence

The politics of accountability in global sustainable commodity governance: Dilemmas of institutional competition and convergence

The accountability of market-driven sustainability governance has long been controversial, reflecting the deeply political processes through which accountability contests shape governance transformations. Drawing on illustrative examples from internationally traded agro-commodity sectors in the critical case of Indonesia, this paper examines the contested processes of accountability that have accompanied a recent period of institutional change in sustainability governance. Amidst rising critiques of global certification, there has been a parallel expansion of governance approaches that prioritise capability development over regulatory enforcement and engage more intensively with governments in commodity-producing countries. As alternative governance models gain influence, tensions between competing governance stakeholders and agendas are mirrored and amplified through parallel accountability contests, in which distributional conflicts between global and local stakeholders are intensified by pressures to adopt contentious systems of compliance verification. While accountability gaps associated with contrasting institutional models produce strong pressures for partial institutional convergence, such convergence coexists with new forms of institutional fragmentation, as competition between global and national certification expands to encompass competition with localised capacity-building and jurisdictional approaches. Analysis highlights the often-neglected role of accountability politics in shaping institutional change, while raising pressing questions about the distributional implications of contemporary shifts away from global certification governance models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信