奶油奶酪和植物类似物的感官特征:通过闪光特征、CATA 和 RATA 测试得出的方法

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Kívea Kássia de Paiva e Silva, Bruno Domingues Galli, Michelle Alban, Débora Parra Baptista, Elizabeth Harumi Nabeshima, Paulo Henrique Mariano Marfil, Mirna Lúcia Gigante
{"title":"奶油奶酪和植物类似物的感官特征:通过闪光特征、CATA 和 RATA 测试得出的方法","authors":"Kívea Kássia de Paiva e Silva,&nbsp;Bruno Domingues Galli,&nbsp;Michelle Alban,&nbsp;Débora Parra Baptista,&nbsp;Elizabeth Harumi Nabeshima,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Mariano Marfil,&nbsp;Mirna Lúcia Gigante","doi":"10.1111/ijfs.17484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The distinct techno-functional and sensory attributes conferred by milk proteins and fat are fundamental in defining the structure, texture and flavour of dairy products. Thus, reproducing cheese-like characteristics in plant-based alternatives while ensuring consumer acceptance is a major challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the sensory profile of commercial cream cheese and plant-based analogues, quantifying consumer perception and discrimination, and correlating with instrumental texture analysis. For that, two milk-based (MB1 and MB2) and three plant-based products (PB1, PB2 and PB3) were evaluated for their proximate composition, texture profile (spreadability and firmness) and sensory properties by combining Flash Profile method (<i>n</i> = 13), Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) test, and Rate-all-that-apply (RATA) test (<i>n</i> = 102) with global acceptance. Milk-based cream cheeses (MB1 and MB2) did not differ significantly from each other and presented greater spreadability when compared to all plant-based cream cheeses (PB1, PB2 and PB3). The texture parameters of the samples were inversely related: the greater the firmness, the lower the spreadability. All forty-two sensory attributes allowed discrimination of the samples into three distinct clusters, with no difference between the milk-based products. The results of the CATA test showed that the attributes most correlated with the sample MB1 were the most desirable for good acceptance of the product. In turn, PB3 showed lower acceptance scores when compared to the plant-based samples PB1 and PB2, and the attributes rancid flavour, vegetable oil aroma and nut aroma mostly contributed to the lower acceptance of PB3. Milk-based products were very close to the ideal product, presenting a creamy and spreadable texture as key attributes for product characterisation and acceptance. The results of RATA test showed a significant difference (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) in the intensity of nineteen sensory attributes. Milk-based cream cheeses were more accepted than their plant-based counterparts. The instrumental assessments of firmness and spreadability exhibited a negative correlation, once they were inversely proportional and strongly correlated to sensory data of firm and spreadable texture, respectively. The sensory characteristics of cream cheese analogues may present a barrier to their acceptance by consumers. Attributes such as coconut and flour flavour, artificial cheese aroma and flavour, and spreadable texture played a key role in differentiating dairy products from plant-based ones, contributing to the lower acceptance of the latter.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food Science & Technology","volume":"59 12","pages":"9084-9095"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensory profile of cream cheese and plant-based analogues: an approach through flash-profile, CATA and RATA tests\",\"authors\":\"Kívea Kássia de Paiva e Silva,&nbsp;Bruno Domingues Galli,&nbsp;Michelle Alban,&nbsp;Débora Parra Baptista,&nbsp;Elizabeth Harumi Nabeshima,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Mariano Marfil,&nbsp;Mirna Lúcia Gigante\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijfs.17484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The distinct techno-functional and sensory attributes conferred by milk proteins and fat are fundamental in defining the structure, texture and flavour of dairy products. Thus, reproducing cheese-like characteristics in plant-based alternatives while ensuring consumer acceptance is a major challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the sensory profile of commercial cream cheese and plant-based analogues, quantifying consumer perception and discrimination, and correlating with instrumental texture analysis. For that, two milk-based (MB1 and MB2) and three plant-based products (PB1, PB2 and PB3) were evaluated for their proximate composition, texture profile (spreadability and firmness) and sensory properties by combining Flash Profile method (<i>n</i> = 13), Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) test, and Rate-all-that-apply (RATA) test (<i>n</i> = 102) with global acceptance. Milk-based cream cheeses (MB1 and MB2) did not differ significantly from each other and presented greater spreadability when compared to all plant-based cream cheeses (PB1, PB2 and PB3). The texture parameters of the samples were inversely related: the greater the firmness, the lower the spreadability. All forty-two sensory attributes allowed discrimination of the samples into three distinct clusters, with no difference between the milk-based products. The results of the CATA test showed that the attributes most correlated with the sample MB1 were the most desirable for good acceptance of the product. In turn, PB3 showed lower acceptance scores when compared to the plant-based samples PB1 and PB2, and the attributes rancid flavour, vegetable oil aroma and nut aroma mostly contributed to the lower acceptance of PB3. Milk-based products were very close to the ideal product, presenting a creamy and spreadable texture as key attributes for product characterisation and acceptance. The results of RATA test showed a significant difference (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) in the intensity of nineteen sensory attributes. Milk-based cream cheeses were more accepted than their plant-based counterparts. The instrumental assessments of firmness and spreadability exhibited a negative correlation, once they were inversely proportional and strongly correlated to sensory data of firm and spreadable texture, respectively. The sensory characteristics of cream cheese analogues may present a barrier to their acceptance by consumers. Attributes such as coconut and flour flavour, artificial cheese aroma and flavour, and spreadable texture played a key role in differentiating dairy products from plant-based ones, contributing to the lower acceptance of the latter.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Food Science & Technology\",\"volume\":\"59 12\",\"pages\":\"9084-9095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Food Science & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijfs.17484\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijfs.17484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牛奶蛋白质和脂肪所赋予的独特技术功能和感官属性是确定乳制品结构、质地和风味的基础。因此,在植物替代品中再现类似奶酪的特性,同时确保消费者的接受度是一项重大挑战。这项研究旨在评估商业奶油奶酪和植物类似物的感官特征,量化消费者的感知和辨别能力,并与仪器质地分析相关联。为此,研究人员结合闪光曲线法(n = 13)、"全部适用"(CATA)测试和 "全部适用"(RATA)测试(n = 102),对两种奶基产品(MB1 和 MB2)和三种植物基产品(PB1、PB2 和 PB3)的近似成分、质地特征(涂抹性和硬度)和感官特性进行了评估,并得出了总体接受度。与所有植物基奶油奶酪(PB1、PB2 和 PB3)相比,牛奶基奶油奶酪(MB1 和 MB2)之间没有显著差异,并且具有更好的涂抹性。样品的质地参数成反比:硬度越高,涂抹性越低。所有 42 项感官属性可将样品区分为三个不同的组别,奶基产品之间没有差异。CATA 测试结果表明,与 MB1 样品相关度最高的属性是产品最理想的接受度。反过来,与植物基样品 PB1 和 PB2 相比,PB3 的接受度得分较低,馊味、植物油香味和坚果香味是导致 PB3 接受度较低的主要原因。奶基产品非常接近理想产品,其奶油和涂抹口感是产品特征和接受度的关键属性。RATA 测试结果表明,19 种感官属性的强度存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。以牛奶为基础的奶油奶酪比以植物为基础的奶酪更容易被接受。坚硬度和涂抹性的仪器评估结果呈负相关,但它们分别与坚硬度和涂抹性的感官数据呈反比和强相关。奶油奶酪类似物的感官特性可能会阻碍消费者对它们的接受。椰子和面粉风味、人造奶酪香气和风味以及可涂抹质地等特征在区分乳制品和植物基产品方面发挥了关键作用,导致后者的接受度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sensory profile of cream cheese and plant-based analogues: an approach through flash-profile, CATA and RATA tests

Sensory profile of cream cheese and plant-based analogues: an approach through flash-profile, CATA and RATA tests

The distinct techno-functional and sensory attributes conferred by milk proteins and fat are fundamental in defining the structure, texture and flavour of dairy products. Thus, reproducing cheese-like characteristics in plant-based alternatives while ensuring consumer acceptance is a major challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the sensory profile of commercial cream cheese and plant-based analogues, quantifying consumer perception and discrimination, and correlating with instrumental texture analysis. For that, two milk-based (MB1 and MB2) and three plant-based products (PB1, PB2 and PB3) were evaluated for their proximate composition, texture profile (spreadability and firmness) and sensory properties by combining Flash Profile method (n = 13), Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) test, and Rate-all-that-apply (RATA) test (n = 102) with global acceptance. Milk-based cream cheeses (MB1 and MB2) did not differ significantly from each other and presented greater spreadability when compared to all plant-based cream cheeses (PB1, PB2 and PB3). The texture parameters of the samples were inversely related: the greater the firmness, the lower the spreadability. All forty-two sensory attributes allowed discrimination of the samples into three distinct clusters, with no difference between the milk-based products. The results of the CATA test showed that the attributes most correlated with the sample MB1 were the most desirable for good acceptance of the product. In turn, PB3 showed lower acceptance scores when compared to the plant-based samples PB1 and PB2, and the attributes rancid flavour, vegetable oil aroma and nut aroma mostly contributed to the lower acceptance of PB3. Milk-based products were very close to the ideal product, presenting a creamy and spreadable texture as key attributes for product characterisation and acceptance. The results of RATA test showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the intensity of nineteen sensory attributes. Milk-based cream cheeses were more accepted than their plant-based counterparts. The instrumental assessments of firmness and spreadability exhibited a negative correlation, once they were inversely proportional and strongly correlated to sensory data of firm and spreadable texture, respectively. The sensory characteristics of cream cheese analogues may present a barrier to their acceptance by consumers. Attributes such as coconut and flour flavour, artificial cheese aroma and flavour, and spreadable texture played a key role in differentiating dairy products from plant-based ones, contributing to the lower acceptance of the latter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
655
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Food Science & Technology (IJFST) is published for the Institute of Food Science and Technology, the IFST. This authoritative and well-established journal publishes in a wide range of subjects, ranging from pure research in the various sciences associated with food to practical experiments designed to improve technical processes. Subjects covered range from raw material composition to consumer acceptance, from physical properties to food engineering practices, and from quality assurance and safety to storage, distribution, marketing and use. While the main aim of the Journal is to provide a forum for papers describing the results of original research, review articles are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信