Kristel Mijnendonckx, Carla Smolders, Deepa Bartak, Trung Le Duc, Mar Morales-Hidalgo, Cristina Povedano-Priego, Fadwa Jroundi, Mohamed L. Merroun, Natalie Leys, Katerina Cerna
{"title":"比较不同 DNA 提取方法在 MX-80 膨润土中的效果","authors":"Kristel Mijnendonckx, Carla Smolders, Deepa Bartak, Trung Le Duc, Mar Morales-Hidalgo, Cristina Povedano-Priego, Fadwa Jroundi, Mohamed L. Merroun, Natalie Leys, Katerina Cerna","doi":"10.1111/1758-2229.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Approaches to DNA extraction play a crucial role in determining the variability of results obtained through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Particularly, clay-rich samples can impede the efficiency of various standard cultivation-independent techniques. We conducted an inter-laboratory comparison study to thoroughly assess the efficacy of two published DNA extraction methods (kit-based and phenol-chloroform-based) specifically designed for bentonite samples. To this end, we spiked Wyoming MX 80 bentonite with two different mock communities and compared the obtained DNA yield and purity, the presence of contaminants and the community profile. Our findings suggest that both methods are equally viable, with the best choice depending on the specific requirements of the downstream analysis. However, it is crucial to maintain consistency in the chosen method, as comparing results becomes challenging, particularly in the presence of bentonite. In summary, our study emphasizes the significance of standardized DNA extraction methods and underscores the importance of validating these methods using appropriate controls when studying microbial communities with 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, particularly in environments characterized by low biomass and clay-rich compositions. Additionally, slight modifications to one of the extraction methods can substantially enhance its efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":163,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","volume":"16 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-2229.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the effectiveness of different DNA extraction methods in MX-80 bentonite\",\"authors\":\"Kristel Mijnendonckx, Carla Smolders, Deepa Bartak, Trung Le Duc, Mar Morales-Hidalgo, Cristina Povedano-Priego, Fadwa Jroundi, Mohamed L. Merroun, Natalie Leys, Katerina Cerna\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-2229.70047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Approaches to DNA extraction play a crucial role in determining the variability of results obtained through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Particularly, clay-rich samples can impede the efficiency of various standard cultivation-independent techniques. We conducted an inter-laboratory comparison study to thoroughly assess the efficacy of two published DNA extraction methods (kit-based and phenol-chloroform-based) specifically designed for bentonite samples. To this end, we spiked Wyoming MX 80 bentonite with two different mock communities and compared the obtained DNA yield and purity, the presence of contaminants and the community profile. Our findings suggest that both methods are equally viable, with the best choice depending on the specific requirements of the downstream analysis. However, it is crucial to maintain consistency in the chosen method, as comparing results becomes challenging, particularly in the presence of bentonite. In summary, our study emphasizes the significance of standardized DNA extraction methods and underscores the importance of validating these methods using appropriate controls when studying microbial communities with 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, particularly in environments characterized by low biomass and clay-rich compositions. Additionally, slight modifications to one of the extraction methods can substantially enhance its efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Microbiology Reports\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-2229.70047\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Microbiology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-2229.70047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-2229.70047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
DNA 提取方法在决定 16S rRNA 扩增片段测序结果的可变性方面起着至关重要的作用。尤其是富含粘土的样本会妨碍各种标准的独立培养技术的效率。我们进行了一项实验室间比较研究,以全面评估两种已发表的 DNA 提取方法(基于试剂盒和基于苯酚-氯仿)的功效,这两种方法是专门为膨润土样品设计的。为此,我们在怀俄明州 MX 80 膨润土中添加了两种不同的模拟群落,并比较了所获得的 DNA 产量和纯度、污染物的存在以及群落概况。我们的研究结果表明,这两种方法同样可行,最佳选择取决于下游分析的具体要求。然而,保持所选方法的一致性至关重要,因为比较结果具有挑战性,尤其是在存在膨润土的情况下。总之,我们的研究强调了标准化 DNA 提取方法的重要性,并强调了在使用 16S rRNA 扩增子测序法研究微生物群落时,使用适当的控制方法验证这些方法的重要性,尤其是在生物量低和富含粘土的环境中。此外,对其中一种提取方法稍加修改就能大大提高其效率。
Comparing the effectiveness of different DNA extraction methods in MX-80 bentonite
Approaches to DNA extraction play a crucial role in determining the variability of results obtained through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Particularly, clay-rich samples can impede the efficiency of various standard cultivation-independent techniques. We conducted an inter-laboratory comparison study to thoroughly assess the efficacy of two published DNA extraction methods (kit-based and phenol-chloroform-based) specifically designed for bentonite samples. To this end, we spiked Wyoming MX 80 bentonite with two different mock communities and compared the obtained DNA yield and purity, the presence of contaminants and the community profile. Our findings suggest that both methods are equally viable, with the best choice depending on the specific requirements of the downstream analysis. However, it is crucial to maintain consistency in the chosen method, as comparing results becomes challenging, particularly in the presence of bentonite. In summary, our study emphasizes the significance of standardized DNA extraction methods and underscores the importance of validating these methods using appropriate controls when studying microbial communities with 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, particularly in environments characterized by low biomass and clay-rich compositions. Additionally, slight modifications to one of the extraction methods can substantially enhance its efficiency.
期刊介绍:
The journal is identical in scope to Environmental Microbiology, shares the same editorial team and submission site, and will apply the same high level acceptance criteria. The two journals will be mutually supportive and evolve side-by-side.
Environmental Microbiology Reports provides a high profile vehicle for publication of the most innovative, original and rigorous research in the field. The scope of the Journal encompasses the diversity of current research on microbial processes in the environment, microbial communities, interactions and evolution and includes, but is not limited to, the following:
the structure, activities and communal behaviour of microbial communities
microbial community genetics and evolutionary processes
microbial symbioses, microbial interactions and interactions with plants, animals and abiotic factors
microbes in the tree of life, microbial diversification and evolution
population biology and clonal structure
microbial metabolic and structural diversity
microbial physiology, growth and survival
microbes and surfaces, adhesion and biofouling
responses to environmental signals and stress factors
modelling and theory development
pollution microbiology
extremophiles and life in extreme and unusual little-explored habitats
element cycles and biogeochemical processes, primary and secondary production
microbes in a changing world, microbially-influenced global changes
evolution and diversity of archaeal and bacterial viruses
new technological developments in microbial ecology and evolution, in particular for the study of activities of microbial communities, non-culturable microorganisms and emerging pathogens.