职业无所作为量表的开发与验证

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Paulien D'Huyvetter, Marijke Verbruggen, Xinhui Jing, Jos Akkermans
{"title":"职业无所作为量表的开发与验证","authors":"Paulien D'Huyvetter,&nbsp;Marijke Verbruggen,&nbsp;Xinhui Jing,&nbsp;Jos Akkermans","doi":"10.1111/apps.12590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Career inaction is the phenomenon in which people do not take sufficient action to realize a desired change in their career. Despite recent theoretical advancements and strong indications that career inaction is a prevalent phenomenon that brings along important risks to both individuals and organizations, there is no reliable and valid scale to accurately measure it. Therefore, we developed and validated an eight-item scale of career inaction (CARINAS) across four studies. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 258), we pilot-tested the reliability and factor structure of the Dutch CARINAS among Belgian workers. In Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 799), we tested the reliability, measurement invariance across groups, and construct validity of the scale and started exploring the nomological network of the Dutch CARINAS among Belgian career counseling clients. In Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 170), we tested the reliability and validity of the English CARINAS and reran the correlation tests from Study 2 among US workers. Finally, in Study 4 (<i>N</i> = 198), we re-tested the factor structure and reliability of our scale and further explored the nomological network of the Dutch- CARINAS in a two-wave dataset collected with Belgian workers. The results of these four studies revealed that the CARINAS has high reliability and a good factor structure across different groups. Furthermore, the tests of the nomological network yielded interesting insights regarding the assumptions underlying the theory of career inaction. By developing and validating the CARINAS, our study adds to the research on (barriers to) career transitions, paves the way for further empirical research on career inaction, and provides a diagnostic tool for professionals guiding people in their career decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of the Career Inaction Scale\",\"authors\":\"Paulien D'Huyvetter,&nbsp;Marijke Verbruggen,&nbsp;Xinhui Jing,&nbsp;Jos Akkermans\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apps.12590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Career inaction is the phenomenon in which people do not take sufficient action to realize a desired change in their career. Despite recent theoretical advancements and strong indications that career inaction is a prevalent phenomenon that brings along important risks to both individuals and organizations, there is no reliable and valid scale to accurately measure it. Therefore, we developed and validated an eight-item scale of career inaction (CARINAS) across four studies. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 258), we pilot-tested the reliability and factor structure of the Dutch CARINAS among Belgian workers. In Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 799), we tested the reliability, measurement invariance across groups, and construct validity of the scale and started exploring the nomological network of the Dutch CARINAS among Belgian career counseling clients. In Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 170), we tested the reliability and validity of the English CARINAS and reran the correlation tests from Study 2 among US workers. Finally, in Study 4 (<i>N</i> = 198), we re-tested the factor structure and reliability of our scale and further explored the nomological network of the Dutch- CARINAS in a two-wave dataset collected with Belgian workers. The results of these four studies revealed that the CARINAS has high reliability and a good factor structure across different groups. Furthermore, the tests of the nomological network yielded interesting insights regarding the assumptions underlying the theory of career inaction. By developing and validating the CARINAS, our study adds to the research on (barriers to) career transitions, paves the way for further empirical research on career inaction, and provides a diagnostic tool for professionals guiding people in their career decision-making process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12590\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业无所作为是指人们没有采取足够的行动来实现其职业生涯的预期变化。尽管近年来理论研究取得了进展,并且有强烈迹象表明职业无所作为是一种普遍现象,会给个人和组织带来重大风险,但目前还没有可靠有效的量表来准确测量这种现象。因此,我们在四项研究中开发并验证了由八个项目组成的职业无所作为量表(CARINAS)。在研究 1(N = 258)中,我们在比利时工人中对荷兰 CARINAS 的可靠性和因子结构进行了试点测试。在研究 2(N = 799)中,我们测试了量表的可靠性、跨组测量不变性和建构效度,并开始在比利时职业咨询客户中探索荷兰 CARINAS 的名义网络。在研究 3(N = 170)中,我们测试了英语 CARINAS 的信度和效度,并在美国工作者中重新进行了研究 2 中的相关测试。最后,在研究 4(N = 198)中,我们重新测试了量表的因子结构和信度,并在收集到的比利时工人的两波数据集中进一步探索了荷兰语 CARINAS 的命名网络。这四项研究的结果表明,CARINAS 在不同群体中具有较高的可靠性和良好的因子结构。此外,对名义网络的测试还对职业无所作为理论的基本假设提出了有趣的见解。通过开发和验证 CARINAS,我们的研究为职业过渡(障碍)研究增添了新的内容,为进一步开展职业无所作为的实证研究铺平了道路,并为指导人们进行职业决策的专业人员提供了一种诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of the Career Inaction Scale

Career inaction is the phenomenon in which people do not take sufficient action to realize a desired change in their career. Despite recent theoretical advancements and strong indications that career inaction is a prevalent phenomenon that brings along important risks to both individuals and organizations, there is no reliable and valid scale to accurately measure it. Therefore, we developed and validated an eight-item scale of career inaction (CARINAS) across four studies. In Study 1 (N = 258), we pilot-tested the reliability and factor structure of the Dutch CARINAS among Belgian workers. In Study 2 (N = 799), we tested the reliability, measurement invariance across groups, and construct validity of the scale and started exploring the nomological network of the Dutch CARINAS among Belgian career counseling clients. In Study 3 (N = 170), we tested the reliability and validity of the English CARINAS and reran the correlation tests from Study 2 among US workers. Finally, in Study 4 (N = 198), we re-tested the factor structure and reliability of our scale and further explored the nomological network of the Dutch- CARINAS in a two-wave dataset collected with Belgian workers. The results of these four studies revealed that the CARINAS has high reliability and a good factor structure across different groups. Furthermore, the tests of the nomological network yielded interesting insights regarding the assumptions underlying the theory of career inaction. By developing and validating the CARINAS, our study adds to the research on (barriers to) career transitions, paves the way for further empirical research on career inaction, and provides a diagnostic tool for professionals guiding people in their career decision-making process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信