在不断变化的紧急情况下调整快速人种学研究:可推广的抗灾经验教训

IF 0.7 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Elisa J. Sobo, Emily K. Brunson, Stephanie McClure, Elizabeth Cartwright, Meg Jordan, Stephen B. Thomas, Monica Schoch-Spana
{"title":"在不断变化的紧急情况下调整快速人种学研究:可推广的抗灾经验教训","authors":"Elisa J. Sobo,&nbsp;Emily K. Brunson,&nbsp;Stephanie McClure,&nbsp;Elizabeth Cartwright,&nbsp;Meg Jordan,&nbsp;Stephen B. Thomas,&nbsp;Monica Schoch-Spana","doi":"10.1111/napa.12220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To ensure the real-world utility of emergency ethnographic research, plans must evolve as circumstances shift. The CommuniVax coalition's work provides a case study of this scenario. Using rapid ethnographic interviews, focus groups, and other methods, the six local CommuniVax teams sought to comprehend and improve COVID-19 vaccine access and uptake. To this end, they responded nimbly to varying community priorities, the pandemic's shifting nature, evolving bureaucratic mechanisms, and political fluctuations. This paper provides specific examples of such instances, highlighting some of the critical decision points that emerged, demonstrating the flexibility needed for effective rapid community-based research, reiterating the importance of a bottom-up orientation, and elaborating on the trade-offs that occurred in decision-making regarding how best to move forward. This discussion is relevant to tackling any narrowly defined research problem, emergency-related or not, as well as research seeking actionable answers to specific questions that have practical bearing on human lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"48 2","pages":"186-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.12220","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adapting rapid ethnographic research in an evolving emergency: Generalizable lessons in resilience\",\"authors\":\"Elisa J. Sobo,&nbsp;Emily K. Brunson,&nbsp;Stephanie McClure,&nbsp;Elizabeth Cartwright,&nbsp;Meg Jordan,&nbsp;Stephen B. Thomas,&nbsp;Monica Schoch-Spana\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/napa.12220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To ensure the real-world utility of emergency ethnographic research, plans must evolve as circumstances shift. The CommuniVax coalition's work provides a case study of this scenario. Using rapid ethnographic interviews, focus groups, and other methods, the six local CommuniVax teams sought to comprehend and improve COVID-19 vaccine access and uptake. To this end, they responded nimbly to varying community priorities, the pandemic's shifting nature, evolving bureaucratic mechanisms, and political fluctuations. This paper provides specific examples of such instances, highlighting some of the critical decision points that emerged, demonstrating the flexibility needed for effective rapid community-based research, reiterating the importance of a bottom-up orientation, and elaborating on the trade-offs that occurred in decision-making regarding how best to move forward. This discussion is relevant to tackling any narrowly defined research problem, emergency-related or not, as well as research seeking actionable answers to specific questions that have practical bearing on human lives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Anthropological Practice\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"186-203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.12220\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Anthropological Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.12220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.12220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了确保紧急人种学研究在现实世界中的实用性,计划必须随着情况的变化而变化。CommuniVax 联盟的工作为这种情况提供了一个案例研究。通过快速人种学访谈、焦点小组及其他方法,六个当地的 CommuniVax 团队试图了解并改善 COVID-19 疫苗的接种和使用情况。为此,他们对不同的社区优先事项、大流行病的性质变化、官僚机制的演变以及政治波动做出了灵活的反应。本文提供了此类情况的具体实例,强调了出现的一些关键决策点,展示了以社区为基础开展有效快速研究所需的灵活性,重申了自下而上导向的重要性,并详细阐述了在决策过程中就如何以最佳方式向前推进所进行的权衡。这一讨论适用于解决任何狭义的研究问题,无论是否与紧急情况有关,也适用于寻求对人类生活有实际影响的具体问题的可行答案的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Adapting rapid ethnographic research in an evolving emergency: Generalizable lessons in resilience

Adapting rapid ethnographic research in an evolving emergency: Generalizable lessons in resilience

To ensure the real-world utility of emergency ethnographic research, plans must evolve as circumstances shift. The CommuniVax coalition's work provides a case study of this scenario. Using rapid ethnographic interviews, focus groups, and other methods, the six local CommuniVax teams sought to comprehend and improve COVID-19 vaccine access and uptake. To this end, they responded nimbly to varying community priorities, the pandemic's shifting nature, evolving bureaucratic mechanisms, and political fluctuations. This paper provides specific examples of such instances, highlighting some of the critical decision points that emerged, demonstrating the flexibility needed for effective rapid community-based research, reiterating the importance of a bottom-up orientation, and elaborating on the trade-offs that occurred in decision-making regarding how best to move forward. This discussion is relevant to tackling any narrowly defined research problem, emergency-related or not, as well as research seeking actionable answers to specific questions that have practical bearing on human lives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信