评估能源效率和环境污染的现代方法:新趋势和技术创新视角

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Yiying Cao , Fouad Jamaani , Bo Qin
{"title":"评估能源效率和环境污染的现代方法:新趋势和技术创新视角","authors":"Yiying Cao ,&nbsp;Fouad Jamaani ,&nbsp;Bo Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyzes the causal link between technological advancement, environmental degradation, energy usage, and sustainable economic development in China. The paper looks at the extent to which expansion in energy and carbon dioxide emissions can be explained using the Environmental Kuznets Curve model. Only the annual data from the WDI is considered; therefore, only the data range from 1990 to 2019 is used. This work also uses the FMOLS technique to establish the nature of the long-run causal relationship between the variables used in the analysis and establish that environmental quality has worsened in China during the period considered. The result shows that renewable and non-renewable energy sources, along with technological advancement, have a significantly positive impact on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, suggesting that they are detrimental to the environment. Nevertheless, the results confirm the EKC hypothesis since the coefficient estimates for GDP growth are positive, whereas those for the square of this variable are negative. The results also highlight the existence of a unidirectional causality between the Chinese GDP and carbon emissions while reporting on a bi-directional causality between economic growth and energy consumption. This research explores the impact of technological changes and energy consumption on environmental pollution in China, examining the issue left unexplored in understanding the effects of technological change and energy usage on sustainable economic growth. Although many prior studies have focused on the EKC model, very little research has specifically explored the effects of both renewable and non-renewable energy sources on China's environmental quality. This paper is, therefore, a direct attempt at filling this gap by identifying the causal effect of these factors over the 1990–2019 period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101557"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern methodological approaches for evaluating energy efficiency and environmental pollution: Emerging trends and technological innovation perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Yiying Cao ,&nbsp;Fouad Jamaani ,&nbsp;Bo Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study analyzes the causal link between technological advancement, environmental degradation, energy usage, and sustainable economic development in China. The paper looks at the extent to which expansion in energy and carbon dioxide emissions can be explained using the Environmental Kuznets Curve model. Only the annual data from the WDI is considered; therefore, only the data range from 1990 to 2019 is used. This work also uses the FMOLS technique to establish the nature of the long-run causal relationship between the variables used in the analysis and establish that environmental quality has worsened in China during the period considered. The result shows that renewable and non-renewable energy sources, along with technological advancement, have a significantly positive impact on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, suggesting that they are detrimental to the environment. Nevertheless, the results confirm the EKC hypothesis since the coefficient estimates for GDP growth are positive, whereas those for the square of this variable are negative. The results also highlight the existence of a unidirectional causality between the Chinese GDP and carbon emissions while reporting on a bi-directional causality between economic growth and energy consumption. This research explores the impact of technological changes and energy consumption on environmental pollution in China, examining the issue left unexplored in understanding the effects of technological change and energy usage on sustainable economic growth. Although many prior studies have focused on the EKC model, very little research has specifically explored the effects of both renewable and non-renewable energy sources on China's environmental quality. This paper is, therefore, a direct attempt at filling this gap by identifying the causal effect of these factors over the 1990–2019 period.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Strategy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101557\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Strategy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002669\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了中国技术进步、环境恶化、能源使用和经济可持续发展之间的因果关系。本文探讨了使用环境库兹涅茨曲线模型解释能源和二氧化碳排放扩张的程度。本文只考虑了 WDI 的年度数据,因此只使用了 1990 年至 2019 年的数据范围。本研究还使用了 FMOLS 技术来确定分析中使用的变量之间的长期因果关系的性质,并确定中国的环境质量在研究期间有所恶化。结果表明,可再生能源和不可再生能源以及技术进步对二氧化碳排放有显著的正向影响,表明它们对环境不利。然而,结果证实了 EKC 假设,因为国内生产总值增长的系数估计值为正,而该变量平方的系数估计值为负。研究结果还强调了中国 GDP 与碳排放之间存在单向因果关系,同时报告了经济增长与能源消耗之间的双向因果关系。本研究探讨了技术变革和能源消耗对中国环境污染的影响,研究了在理解技术变革和能源使用对可持续经济增长的影响方面尚未被探索的问题。尽管之前的许多研究都侧重于 EKC 模型,但很少有研究专门探讨可再生能源和不可再生能源对中国环境质量的影响。因此,本文通过确定 1990-2019 年间这些因素的因果效应,直接填补了这一空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern methodological approaches for evaluating energy efficiency and environmental pollution: Emerging trends and technological innovation perspectives
This study analyzes the causal link between technological advancement, environmental degradation, energy usage, and sustainable economic development in China. The paper looks at the extent to which expansion in energy and carbon dioxide emissions can be explained using the Environmental Kuznets Curve model. Only the annual data from the WDI is considered; therefore, only the data range from 1990 to 2019 is used. This work also uses the FMOLS technique to establish the nature of the long-run causal relationship between the variables used in the analysis and establish that environmental quality has worsened in China during the period considered. The result shows that renewable and non-renewable energy sources, along with technological advancement, have a significantly positive impact on CO2 emissions, suggesting that they are detrimental to the environment. Nevertheless, the results confirm the EKC hypothesis since the coefficient estimates for GDP growth are positive, whereas those for the square of this variable are negative. The results also highlight the existence of a unidirectional causality between the Chinese GDP and carbon emissions while reporting on a bi-directional causality between economic growth and energy consumption. This research explores the impact of technological changes and energy consumption on environmental pollution in China, examining the issue left unexplored in understanding the effects of technological change and energy usage on sustainable economic growth. Although many prior studies have focused on the EKC model, very little research has specifically explored the effects of both renewable and non-renewable energy sources on China's environmental quality. This paper is, therefore, a direct attempt at filling this gap by identifying the causal effect of these factors over the 1990–2019 period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信