{"title":"利用潜类模型对沿海基础设施类型和基于人们偏好的灰绿混合型基础设施进行分类:日本案例研究","authors":"Yui Omori , Koichi Kuriyama , Takahiro Tsuge , Ayumi Onuma , Yasushi Shoji","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Following the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan, multiple lines of defence applying various approaches to structural/non-structural coastal defence has gained momentum. These changes have led to accelerate the development of hybrid infrastructure, which combines artificial and natural features, to provide essential defense functions while also harnessing the benefits of ecosystem services, including recreation and biodiversity conservation in Japan. However, the higher the number of services and stakeholder groups targeted, the lower is the capacity to maximise the delivery of each service and simultaneously fulfil the specific needs of each stakeholder group. This study conducted an online survey across Japan and obtained 861 valid responses for the analysis, elucidating the optimal balance between artificial and natural feature using a latent class model. Additionally, we examined whether the anticipated risk of the Nankai Trough earthquake and tsunami influenced perceptions of coastal infrastructure. The results showed that 81.7 % of our respondents favoured hybrid infrastructure, which can be classified into five distinct types with varying levels of grey and natural components. Furthermore, individuals who undertook personal tsunami preparedness measures, such as reviewing hazard maps and participating in evacuation drills, were more inclined to prefer hybrid infrastructure. In contrast, those who were less prepared for tsunamis or took no action tended to lean towards the exclusive installation of either grey or natural infrastructure. There was no statistically significant difference in Nankai Trough tsunami-prone area in preferable coastal infrastructure types; however, it highlighted the potential needs and importance for hybrid infrastructure to be multi-objective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 104992"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coastal infrastructure typology and people's preference-based grey-green-hybrid infrastructure classifications using a latent class model: A case study of Japan\",\"authors\":\"Yui Omori , Koichi Kuriyama , Takahiro Tsuge , Ayumi Onuma , Yasushi Shoji\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Following the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan, multiple lines of defence applying various approaches to structural/non-structural coastal defence has gained momentum. These changes have led to accelerate the development of hybrid infrastructure, which combines artificial and natural features, to provide essential defense functions while also harnessing the benefits of ecosystem services, including recreation and biodiversity conservation in Japan. However, the higher the number of services and stakeholder groups targeted, the lower is the capacity to maximise the delivery of each service and simultaneously fulfil the specific needs of each stakeholder group. This study conducted an online survey across Japan and obtained 861 valid responses for the analysis, elucidating the optimal balance between artificial and natural feature using a latent class model. Additionally, we examined whether the anticipated risk of the Nankai Trough earthquake and tsunami influenced perceptions of coastal infrastructure. The results showed that 81.7 % of our respondents favoured hybrid infrastructure, which can be classified into five distinct types with varying levels of grey and natural components. Furthermore, individuals who undertook personal tsunami preparedness measures, such as reviewing hazard maps and participating in evacuation drills, were more inclined to prefer hybrid infrastructure. In contrast, those who were less prepared for tsunamis or took no action tended to lean towards the exclusive installation of either grey or natural infrastructure. There was no statistically significant difference in Nankai Trough tsunami-prone area in preferable coastal infrastructure types; however, it highlighted the potential needs and importance for hybrid infrastructure to be multi-objective.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104992\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924007544\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924007544","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Coastal infrastructure typology and people's preference-based grey-green-hybrid infrastructure classifications using a latent class model: A case study of Japan
Following the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan, multiple lines of defence applying various approaches to structural/non-structural coastal defence has gained momentum. These changes have led to accelerate the development of hybrid infrastructure, which combines artificial and natural features, to provide essential defense functions while also harnessing the benefits of ecosystem services, including recreation and biodiversity conservation in Japan. However, the higher the number of services and stakeholder groups targeted, the lower is the capacity to maximise the delivery of each service and simultaneously fulfil the specific needs of each stakeholder group. This study conducted an online survey across Japan and obtained 861 valid responses for the analysis, elucidating the optimal balance between artificial and natural feature using a latent class model. Additionally, we examined whether the anticipated risk of the Nankai Trough earthquake and tsunami influenced perceptions of coastal infrastructure. The results showed that 81.7 % of our respondents favoured hybrid infrastructure, which can be classified into five distinct types with varying levels of grey and natural components. Furthermore, individuals who undertook personal tsunami preparedness measures, such as reviewing hazard maps and participating in evacuation drills, were more inclined to prefer hybrid infrastructure. In contrast, those who were less prepared for tsunamis or took no action tended to lean towards the exclusive installation of either grey or natural infrastructure. There was no statistically significant difference in Nankai Trough tsunami-prone area in preferable coastal infrastructure types; however, it highlighted the potential needs and importance for hybrid infrastructure to be multi-objective.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.