Valentin H. Klaus , Franziska J. Richter , Nina Buchmann , Martin Hartmann , Andreas Lüscher , Olivier Huguenin-Elie
{"title":"评估农用草地多功能性的指标","authors":"Valentin H. Klaus , Franziska J. Richter , Nina Buchmann , Martin Hartmann , Andreas Lüscher , Olivier Huguenin-Elie","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Grasslands are highly multifunctional ecosystems, providing forage to livestock and many regulating and cultural ecosystem services (ES). Agri-environmental schemes (AES) often aim at sustaining and increasing especially non-production ES, i.e., those services not primarily relevant for production but for society as a whole. An open question restricting the implementation of such AES for grassland ES multifunctionality is how to effectively measure and monitor multifunctionality without separately accounting for all single ES.</div><div>To address this question, we measured 30 plot-level ES indicators, including plant species richness, in 88 permanent grasslands along a fertilization intensity gradient in Switzerland. We explored the correlative structure among all ES indicators and the potential of each indicator to approximate non-production ES multifunctionality. We finally discuss potentially suitable ES-multifunctionality indicators for future result-based AES.</div><div>The analyses revealed two distinct bundles within the comprehensive list of ES indicators considered in the study. The first bundle consisted of ten ES indicators, including aesthetic appreciation, fungal richness, plant richness, and several ES indicators for reduced adverse environmental impacts (e.g., lower nutrient leaching risk). This bundle was strongly negatively related to the second bundle, composed of twelve ES indicators that were mostly directly related to intensive forage production (e.g., nutrient supply, yield quantity and yield quality). Plant species richness (positive) and fertilization intensity (negative) were the two measures most closely related to non-production multifunctionality, highlighting their potential to be put to use as multifunctionality indicators.</div><div>We argue that due to the policy relevance of biodiversity conservation, plant species richness could find application as indicator for AES designed to increase and monitor grassland non-production multifunctionality. While plant species richness is rather stable over time, considering changes (reductions) in fertilization intensity could be an option for a more responsive indicator to be used to facilitate ES-positive grassland management on the short term. Integrating our findings in future agricultural policies could be a significant step towards rewarding land users for the non-production benefits provided by their agroecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 112846"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indicators for assessing the multifunctionality of agriculturally used grasslands\",\"authors\":\"Valentin H. Klaus , Franziska J. Richter , Nina Buchmann , Martin Hartmann , Andreas Lüscher , Olivier Huguenin-Elie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Grasslands are highly multifunctional ecosystems, providing forage to livestock and many regulating and cultural ecosystem services (ES). Agri-environmental schemes (AES) often aim at sustaining and increasing especially non-production ES, i.e., those services not primarily relevant for production but for society as a whole. An open question restricting the implementation of such AES for grassland ES multifunctionality is how to effectively measure and monitor multifunctionality without separately accounting for all single ES.</div><div>To address this question, we measured 30 plot-level ES indicators, including plant species richness, in 88 permanent grasslands along a fertilization intensity gradient in Switzerland. We explored the correlative structure among all ES indicators and the potential of each indicator to approximate non-production ES multifunctionality. We finally discuss potentially suitable ES-multifunctionality indicators for future result-based AES.</div><div>The analyses revealed two distinct bundles within the comprehensive list of ES indicators considered in the study. The first bundle consisted of ten ES indicators, including aesthetic appreciation, fungal richness, plant richness, and several ES indicators for reduced adverse environmental impacts (e.g., lower nutrient leaching risk). This bundle was strongly negatively related to the second bundle, composed of twelve ES indicators that were mostly directly related to intensive forage production (e.g., nutrient supply, yield quantity and yield quality). Plant species richness (positive) and fertilization intensity (negative) were the two measures most closely related to non-production multifunctionality, highlighting their potential to be put to use as multifunctionality indicators.</div><div>We argue that due to the policy relevance of biodiversity conservation, plant species richness could find application as indicator for AES designed to increase and monitor grassland non-production multifunctionality. While plant species richness is rather stable over time, considering changes (reductions) in fertilization intensity could be an option for a more responsive indicator to be used to facilitate ES-positive grassland management on the short term. Integrating our findings in future agricultural policies could be a significant step towards rewarding land users for the non-production benefits provided by their agroecosystems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112846\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24013037\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24013037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
草地是高度多功能的生态系统,为牲畜提供饲料,并提供许多调节和文化生态系统服务 (ES)。农业环境计划 (AES) 通常旨在维持和增加非生产性生态系统服务,即主要与生产无关但对整个社会有益的服务。为了解决这个问题,我们测量了瑞士施肥强度梯度上 88 块永久性草地的 30 个地块级 ES 指标,包括植物物种丰富度。针对这一问题,我们在瑞士施肥强度梯度的 88 块永久性草地上测量了 30 个地块级 ES 指标,包括植物物种丰富度。我们探讨了所有 ES 指标之间的相关结构,以及每个指标近似非生产 ES 多功能性的潜力。最后,我们讨论了可能适用于未来基于结果的农业生态学研究的ES多功能性指标。分析表明,在本研究考虑的ES指标综合清单中有两个不同的指标组。第一组由 10 个 ES 指标组成,包括美学鉴赏力、真菌丰富度、植物丰富度,以及若干降低不利环境影响的 ES 指标(如降低营养物质沥滤风险)。这一组指标与第二组指标呈强烈负相关,第二组指标由 12 个 ES 指标组成,大多与集约化饲草生产直接相关(如养分供应、产量和质量)。植物物种丰富度(正相关)和施肥强度(负相关)是与非生产多功能性关系最密切的两个指标,突出了它们作为多功能性指标的应用潜力。我们认为,由于生物多样性保护的政策相关性,植物物种丰富度可以作为旨在提高和监测草地非生产多功能性的农业生态服务的指标。虽然植物物种丰富度随着时间的推移相当稳定,但考虑施肥强度的变化(减少)也不失为一种更灵敏的指标选择,可用于促进短期内积极的ES草原管理。将我们的研究结果纳入未来的农业政策中,将是对土地使用者因其农业生态系统提供的非生产性效益而给予奖励的重要一步。
Indicators for assessing the multifunctionality of agriculturally used grasslands
Grasslands are highly multifunctional ecosystems, providing forage to livestock and many regulating and cultural ecosystem services (ES). Agri-environmental schemes (AES) often aim at sustaining and increasing especially non-production ES, i.e., those services not primarily relevant for production but for society as a whole. An open question restricting the implementation of such AES for grassland ES multifunctionality is how to effectively measure and monitor multifunctionality without separately accounting for all single ES.
To address this question, we measured 30 plot-level ES indicators, including plant species richness, in 88 permanent grasslands along a fertilization intensity gradient in Switzerland. We explored the correlative structure among all ES indicators and the potential of each indicator to approximate non-production ES multifunctionality. We finally discuss potentially suitable ES-multifunctionality indicators for future result-based AES.
The analyses revealed two distinct bundles within the comprehensive list of ES indicators considered in the study. The first bundle consisted of ten ES indicators, including aesthetic appreciation, fungal richness, plant richness, and several ES indicators for reduced adverse environmental impacts (e.g., lower nutrient leaching risk). This bundle was strongly negatively related to the second bundle, composed of twelve ES indicators that were mostly directly related to intensive forage production (e.g., nutrient supply, yield quantity and yield quality). Plant species richness (positive) and fertilization intensity (negative) were the two measures most closely related to non-production multifunctionality, highlighting their potential to be put to use as multifunctionality indicators.
We argue that due to the policy relevance of biodiversity conservation, plant species richness could find application as indicator for AES designed to increase and monitor grassland non-production multifunctionality. While plant species richness is rather stable over time, considering changes (reductions) in fertilization intensity could be an option for a more responsive indicator to be used to facilitate ES-positive grassland management on the short term. Integrating our findings in future agricultural policies could be a significant step towards rewarding land users for the non-production benefits provided by their agroecosystems.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.