Sheng-Hao Zhang , Jun Yang , Jixin Cheng , Xiaoming Li
{"title":"探索数字化的碳反弹效应及对策:基于 CDEEEA/CGE 的分析","authors":"Sheng-Hao Zhang , Jun Yang , Jixin Cheng , Xiaoming Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digitalization offers tremendous potential for low-carbon development in China, yet the carbon rebound effect it triggers remains controversial. This paper develops China's Digital-Economy-Energy-Environment Analysis/Computable General Equilibrium (CDEEEA/CGE) model, which assesses the actual input of ICT and its factor characteristics for the first time. On this basis, the digitalization process of China is modeled based on the endogenous drive of digital industrialization, and the carbon emission effect of digitalization is innovatively decomposed, thereby revealing the formation mechanism of the carbon rebound effect. Research results indicate that in the digital industrialization scenario, through the substitution effect, the share of ICT factor input and the share of the tertiary industry increase, which leads to a favorable performance of carbon intensity (−3.61 % in 2060). However, the extra carbon emissions (256.64 Mt. in 2060) resulting from the output effect and the income effect completely counteract the expected emission reductions (116.4 Mt. in 2060), triggering a backfire effect. Nevertheless, policymakers should not narrowly pursue a low rebound effect, as its essence represents the redistribution of the digitalization dividend. This paper further points out that the complementary environmental policy can largely retain the economic benefits of digitalization while eliminating the environmental impact of the carbon rebound effect. This research offers novel theoretical grounds and practical routes for sustainable development in the digitalization backdrop.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108050"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the carbon rebound effect of digitalization and policy responses: A CDEEEA/CGE based analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sheng-Hao Zhang , Jun Yang , Jixin Cheng , Xiaoming Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Digitalization offers tremendous potential for low-carbon development in China, yet the carbon rebound effect it triggers remains controversial. This paper develops China's Digital-Economy-Energy-Environment Analysis/Computable General Equilibrium (CDEEEA/CGE) model, which assesses the actual input of ICT and its factor characteristics for the first time. On this basis, the digitalization process of China is modeled based on the endogenous drive of digital industrialization, and the carbon emission effect of digitalization is innovatively decomposed, thereby revealing the formation mechanism of the carbon rebound effect. Research results indicate that in the digital industrialization scenario, through the substitution effect, the share of ICT factor input and the share of the tertiary industry increase, which leads to a favorable performance of carbon intensity (−3.61 % in 2060). However, the extra carbon emissions (256.64 Mt. in 2060) resulting from the output effect and the income effect completely counteract the expected emission reductions (116.4 Mt. in 2060), triggering a backfire effect. Nevertheless, policymakers should not narrowly pursue a low rebound effect, as its essence represents the redistribution of the digitalization dividend. This paper further points out that the complementary environmental policy can largely retain the economic benefits of digitalization while eliminating the environmental impact of the carbon rebound effect. This research offers novel theoretical grounds and practical routes for sustainable development in the digitalization backdrop.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832400759X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832400759X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the carbon rebound effect of digitalization and policy responses: A CDEEEA/CGE based analysis
Digitalization offers tremendous potential for low-carbon development in China, yet the carbon rebound effect it triggers remains controversial. This paper develops China's Digital-Economy-Energy-Environment Analysis/Computable General Equilibrium (CDEEEA/CGE) model, which assesses the actual input of ICT and its factor characteristics for the first time. On this basis, the digitalization process of China is modeled based on the endogenous drive of digital industrialization, and the carbon emission effect of digitalization is innovatively decomposed, thereby revealing the formation mechanism of the carbon rebound effect. Research results indicate that in the digital industrialization scenario, through the substitution effect, the share of ICT factor input and the share of the tertiary industry increase, which leads to a favorable performance of carbon intensity (−3.61 % in 2060). However, the extra carbon emissions (256.64 Mt. in 2060) resulting from the output effect and the income effect completely counteract the expected emission reductions (116.4 Mt. in 2060), triggering a backfire effect. Nevertheless, policymakers should not narrowly pursue a low rebound effect, as its essence represents the redistribution of the digitalization dividend. This paper further points out that the complementary environmental policy can largely retain the economic benefits of digitalization while eliminating the environmental impact of the carbon rebound effect. This research offers novel theoretical grounds and practical routes for sustainable development in the digitalization backdrop.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.