在预测大学包容性实践时,教职员工脆弱的社会身份是否重要?

José-Luis Álvarez-Castillo, Gemma Fernández-Caminero, Luis Espino-Díaz, Rocío Luque-González
{"title":"在预测大学包容性实践时,教职员工脆弱的社会身份是否重要?","authors":"José-Luis Álvarez-Castillo,&nbsp;Gemma Fernández-Caminero,&nbsp;Luis Espino-Díaz,&nbsp;Rocío Luque-González","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Some qualitative studies have shown that faculty and chief diversity officers belonging to minority groups are firmly committed to advancing diversity, equity and inclusion in their universities. This suggests that identification with minority groups could be linked to the inclusive attitudes and practices of higher education professionals, an expectation that is consistent with the predictions of the Social Identity Theory proposed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner. Within the framework of this theoretical model, the quantitative study presented here was designed to test whether the vulnerable social identities of university teachers predict their diversity practices, if they do so through their beliefs and attitudes towards diversity, and whether certain sociodemographic variables act as moderators (gender and job tenure). With a survey-based design, we collected data from 972 faculty members from eight Spanish public universities, which we analysed using linear regression, structural equation analysis and moderation analysis. The results showed that lecturers’ affiliation to vulnerable groups significantly but weakly predicted their attitudes towards diversity and inclusive practices. The effect on practices was partially mediated by attitudes. In addition, the direct effect of social identity on inclusive research and teaching innovation was moderated by gender – it was only significant in women. In the discussion section, we interpret the weakness of the effect of social identity in terms of the possible limited commitment to minority group identities of university faculty, concurrent with fundamentally non-threatening contextual norms. As an application of the results, we propose the development of more solid and transformative diversity policies, clear and operational rules, convergent and coordinated management mechanisms, and training aimed at strengthening and integrating social and professional identities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 101222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do vulnerable social identities of faculty matter when predicting their inclusive practices at university?\",\"authors\":\"José-Luis Álvarez-Castillo,&nbsp;Gemma Fernández-Caminero,&nbsp;Luis Espino-Díaz,&nbsp;Rocío Luque-González\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Some qualitative studies have shown that faculty and chief diversity officers belonging to minority groups are firmly committed to advancing diversity, equity and inclusion in their universities. This suggests that identification with minority groups could be linked to the inclusive attitudes and practices of higher education professionals, an expectation that is consistent with the predictions of the Social Identity Theory proposed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner. Within the framework of this theoretical model, the quantitative study presented here was designed to test whether the vulnerable social identities of university teachers predict their diversity practices, if they do so through their beliefs and attitudes towards diversity, and whether certain sociodemographic variables act as moderators (gender and job tenure). With a survey-based design, we collected data from 972 faculty members from eight Spanish public universities, which we analysed using linear regression, structural equation analysis and moderation analysis. The results showed that lecturers’ affiliation to vulnerable groups significantly but weakly predicted their attitudes towards diversity and inclusive practices. The effect on practices was partially mediated by attitudes. In addition, the direct effect of social identity on inclusive research and teaching innovation was moderated by gender – it was only significant in women. In the discussion section, we interpret the weakness of the effect of social identity in terms of the possible limited commitment to minority group identities of university faculty, concurrent with fundamentally non-threatening contextual norms. As an application of the results, we propose the development of more solid and transformative diversity policies, clear and operational rules, convergent and coordinated management mechanisms, and training aimed at strengthening and integrating social and professional identities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social sciences & humanities open\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social sciences & humanities open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291124004194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291124004194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些定性研究表明,属于少数群体的教职员工和首席多样性官员坚定地致力于推进其所在大学的多样性、公平性和包容性。这表明,对少数群体的认同可能与高等教育专业人员的全纳态度和做法有关,这一预期与亨利-塔杰菲尔和约翰-特纳提出的社会认同理论的预测是一致的。在这一理论模型的框架内,本文介绍的定量研究旨在检验大学教师脆弱的社会身份是否能预测他们的多样性实践,是否能通过他们对多样性的信念和态度来预测,以及某些社会人口变量(性别和工作任期)是否起到调节作用。通过调查设计,我们收集了来自西班牙八所公立大学 972 名教师的数据,并使用线性回归、结构方程分析和调节分析对这些数据进行了分析。结果显示,讲师与弱势群体的从属关系对他们对多样性和包容性实践的态度有明显但微弱的预测作用。对实践的影响部分是由态度中介的。此外,社会身份对包容性研究和教学创新的直接影响受到性别的调节--只对女性有显著影响。在讨论部分,我们从大学教职员工对少数群体身份的承诺可能有限以及基本不具威胁性的环境规范的角度,解释了社会认同效应的弱化。作为结果的应用,我们建议制定更加稳固和变革性的多样性政策、明确和可操作的规则、趋同和协调的管理机制,以及旨在加强和整合社会身份和职业身份的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do vulnerable social identities of faculty matter when predicting their inclusive practices at university?
Some qualitative studies have shown that faculty and chief diversity officers belonging to minority groups are firmly committed to advancing diversity, equity and inclusion in their universities. This suggests that identification with minority groups could be linked to the inclusive attitudes and practices of higher education professionals, an expectation that is consistent with the predictions of the Social Identity Theory proposed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner. Within the framework of this theoretical model, the quantitative study presented here was designed to test whether the vulnerable social identities of university teachers predict their diversity practices, if they do so through their beliefs and attitudes towards diversity, and whether certain sociodemographic variables act as moderators (gender and job tenure). With a survey-based design, we collected data from 972 faculty members from eight Spanish public universities, which we analysed using linear regression, structural equation analysis and moderation analysis. The results showed that lecturers’ affiliation to vulnerable groups significantly but weakly predicted their attitudes towards diversity and inclusive practices. The effect on practices was partially mediated by attitudes. In addition, the direct effect of social identity on inclusive research and teaching innovation was moderated by gender – it was only significant in women. In the discussion section, we interpret the weakness of the effect of social identity in terms of the possible limited commitment to minority group identities of university faculty, concurrent with fundamentally non-threatening contextual norms. As an application of the results, we propose the development of more solid and transformative diversity policies, clear and operational rules, convergent and coordinated management mechanisms, and training aimed at strengthening and integrating social and professional identities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信