磁共振肠造影的造影剂

A. Álvarez-Cofiño Tuñón, M. da Silva Torres, A. Fernández del Valle, P. Noriega Menéndez, R. Menéndez de Llano Ortega, P. González Filgueira
{"title":"磁共振肠造影的造影剂","authors":"A. Álvarez-Cofiño Tuñón,&nbsp;M. da Silva Torres,&nbsp;A. Fernández del Valle,&nbsp;P. Noriega Menéndez,&nbsp;R. Menéndez de Llano Ortega,&nbsp;P. González Filgueira","doi":"10.1016/j.rxeng.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Magnetic resonance enterography is primarily indicated for inflammatory bowel diseases. The study of the gastrointestinal tract using MRI has become feasible due to the emergence of ultrafast sequences with higher spatial resolution and phased-array coils enabling wider fields of view. However, to ensure the quality of the examination, it is essential to have prior preparation with oral or rectal contrast to distend the lumen and improve the definition of the intestinal wall. These contrast agents can be positive, negative or biphasic, depending on the signal intensity they induce in the intestinal lumen. Most commonly used biphasic contrasts agents behave as hyperintense in T2 and hypointense in T1. Achieving a “black” intestinal lumen in 3D T1-weighted sequences with intravenous contrast injection is crucial for mucosal assessment and parietal enhancement. Although more cost-effective and accessible, biphasic agents like PEG and mannitol are relatively discomforting for patients. While negative agents are preferred, they are currently unavailable. The purpose of this article is to review the different types of contrast agents mentioned in the literature and their application in intestinal resonance, analyzing the effects they generate on the image, their possible indications and associated limitations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94185,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia","volume":"66 ","pages":"Pages S89-S97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast agents for MR enterography\",\"authors\":\"A. Álvarez-Cofiño Tuñón,&nbsp;M. da Silva Torres,&nbsp;A. Fernández del Valle,&nbsp;P. Noriega Menéndez,&nbsp;R. Menéndez de Llano Ortega,&nbsp;P. González Filgueira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rxeng.2024.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Magnetic resonance enterography is primarily indicated for inflammatory bowel diseases. The study of the gastrointestinal tract using MRI has become feasible due to the emergence of ultrafast sequences with higher spatial resolution and phased-array coils enabling wider fields of view. However, to ensure the quality of the examination, it is essential to have prior preparation with oral or rectal contrast to distend the lumen and improve the definition of the intestinal wall. These contrast agents can be positive, negative or biphasic, depending on the signal intensity they induce in the intestinal lumen. Most commonly used biphasic contrasts agents behave as hyperintense in T2 and hypointense in T1. Achieving a “black” intestinal lumen in 3D T1-weighted sequences with intravenous contrast injection is crucial for mucosal assessment and parietal enhancement. Although more cost-effective and accessible, biphasic agents like PEG and mannitol are relatively discomforting for patients. While negative agents are preferred, they are currently unavailable. The purpose of this article is to review the different types of contrast agents mentioned in the literature and their application in intestinal resonance, analyzing the effects they generate on the image, their possible indications and associated limitations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Pages S89-S97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510724001150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510724001150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

磁共振肠造影主要适用于炎症性肠病。由于出现了空间分辨率更高的超快序列和视野更宽的相控阵线圈,利用磁共振成像对胃肠道进行研究已变得可行。然而,为了确保检查质量,必须事先用口服或直肠造影剂做好准备,使管腔膨胀,提高肠壁的清晰度。这些造影剂可以是正性的、负性的或双相的,取决于它们在肠腔中引起的信号强度。最常用的双相造影剂在 T2 表现为高强化,在 T1 表现为低强化。通过静脉注射造影剂,在三维 T1 加权序列中获得 "黑色 "肠腔对粘膜评估和顶叶增强至关重要。虽然 PEG 和甘露醇等双相制剂更具成本效益,也更容易获得,但患者会感到相对不适。虽然阴性制剂是首选,但目前还没有。本文旨在回顾文献中提到的不同类型的造影剂及其在肠道共振中的应用,分析它们对图像产生的影响、可能的适应症和相关限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrast agents for MR enterography
Magnetic resonance enterography is primarily indicated for inflammatory bowel diseases. The study of the gastrointestinal tract using MRI has become feasible due to the emergence of ultrafast sequences with higher spatial resolution and phased-array coils enabling wider fields of view. However, to ensure the quality of the examination, it is essential to have prior preparation with oral or rectal contrast to distend the lumen and improve the definition of the intestinal wall. These contrast agents can be positive, negative or biphasic, depending on the signal intensity they induce in the intestinal lumen. Most commonly used biphasic contrasts agents behave as hyperintense in T2 and hypointense in T1. Achieving a “black” intestinal lumen in 3D T1-weighted sequences with intravenous contrast injection is crucial for mucosal assessment and parietal enhancement. Although more cost-effective and accessible, biphasic agents like PEG and mannitol are relatively discomforting for patients. While negative agents are preferred, they are currently unavailable. The purpose of this article is to review the different types of contrast agents mentioned in the literature and their application in intestinal resonance, analyzing the effects they generate on the image, their possible indications and associated limitations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信