他和她的收入轨迹:不同性别夫妇内部和之间的经济同妻制与长期收入不平等

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Allison Dunatchik
{"title":"他和她的收入轨迹:不同性别夫妇内部和之间的经济同妻制与长期收入不平等","authors":"Allison Dunatchik","doi":"10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Economic homogamy has important implications for gender inequality and for economic inequalities between households. However, the long-term association between spouses’ earnings is not well understood. This study reconceptualizes economic homogamy as a life course process rather than a static state of being that can be adequately captured at a single point in time. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979, I examine the association between spouses’ earnings trajectories over the course of 30 years of marriage to identify three distinct gender egalitarian earnings patterns among couples. 50 % of couples follow a <em>Dual earner</em> pattern, in which spouses follow similar, stable earnings patterns over time, 6 % of couples are <em>Jointly mobile</em> in that spouses’ earnings vary similarly and 5 % follow an <em>Alternating earner</em> pattern. A large minority of couples follow patterns of long-term specialization, with 34 % of couples following <em>Male breadwinner</em> patterns and 5 % following <em>Female breadwinner</em> patterns. Multivariate analysis reveals that gender egalitarian earnings patterns are stratified by couples’ socio-economic status at marriage: while advantaged couples follow <em>Dual earner</em> patterns comprised of two stable earners, disadvantaged couples follow egalitarian earnings patterns characterized by joint earnings instability. By taking a long-term approach, this study provides insight into the varied ways gender equality in earnings manifests among married couples and reveals an important and understudied dimension of economic homogamy: the concentration of economic stability and instability within couples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47384,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 100995"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"His and hers earnings trajectories: Economic homogamy and long-term earnings inequality within and between different-sex couples\",\"authors\":\"Allison Dunatchik\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Economic homogamy has important implications for gender inequality and for economic inequalities between households. However, the long-term association between spouses’ earnings is not well understood. This study reconceptualizes economic homogamy as a life course process rather than a static state of being that can be adequately captured at a single point in time. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979, I examine the association between spouses’ earnings trajectories over the course of 30 years of marriage to identify three distinct gender egalitarian earnings patterns among couples. 50 % of couples follow a <em>Dual earner</em> pattern, in which spouses follow similar, stable earnings patterns over time, 6 % of couples are <em>Jointly mobile</em> in that spouses’ earnings vary similarly and 5 % follow an <em>Alternating earner</em> pattern. A large minority of couples follow patterns of long-term specialization, with 34 % of couples following <em>Male breadwinner</em> patterns and 5 % following <em>Female breadwinner</em> patterns. Multivariate analysis reveals that gender egalitarian earnings patterns are stratified by couples’ socio-economic status at marriage: while advantaged couples follow <em>Dual earner</em> patterns comprised of two stable earners, disadvantaged couples follow egalitarian earnings patterns characterized by joint earnings instability. By taking a long-term approach, this study provides insight into the varied ways gender equality in earnings manifests among married couples and reveals an important and understudied dimension of economic homogamy: the concentration of economic stability and instability within couples.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562424001082\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562424001082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经济上的一夫一妻制对性别不平等和家庭之间的经济不平等具有重要影响。然而,人们对配偶收入之间的长期联系还不甚了解。本研究将经济同妻重新概念化,将其视为一个生命过程,而不是一个可以在单一时间点充分捕捉到的静态状态。通过使用 1979 年全国青年纵向调查(National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979)的数据,我研究了婚姻 30 年中配偶收入轨迹之间的关联,从而在夫妻中发现了三种不同的性别平等收入模式。50%的夫妻遵循双职工模式,即夫妻双方在一段时间内遵循相似、稳定的收入模式;6%的夫妻属于共同流动模式,即夫妻双方的收入变化相似;5%的夫妻遵循交替职工模式。34% 的夫妇采用男性养家糊口模式,5% 的夫妇采用女性养家糊口模式。多变量分析表明,性别平等收入模式因夫妇结婚时的社会经济地位而分层:优势夫妇采用由两个稳定的收入者组成的双收入者模式,而劣势夫妇则采用以共同收入不稳定为特征的平等收入模式。通过采取长期研究方法,本研究深入探讨了已婚夫妇收入性别平等的不同表现形式,并揭示了经济同妻制的一个重要且未被充分研究的层面:经济稳定性和不稳定性在夫妇内部的集中体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
His and hers earnings trajectories: Economic homogamy and long-term earnings inequality within and between different-sex couples
Economic homogamy has important implications for gender inequality and for economic inequalities between households. However, the long-term association between spouses’ earnings is not well understood. This study reconceptualizes economic homogamy as a life course process rather than a static state of being that can be adequately captured at a single point in time. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979, I examine the association between spouses’ earnings trajectories over the course of 30 years of marriage to identify three distinct gender egalitarian earnings patterns among couples. 50 % of couples follow a Dual earner pattern, in which spouses follow similar, stable earnings patterns over time, 6 % of couples are Jointly mobile in that spouses’ earnings vary similarly and 5 % follow an Alternating earner pattern. A large minority of couples follow patterns of long-term specialization, with 34 % of couples following Male breadwinner patterns and 5 % following Female breadwinner patterns. Multivariate analysis reveals that gender egalitarian earnings patterns are stratified by couples’ socio-economic status at marriage: while advantaged couples follow Dual earner patterns comprised of two stable earners, disadvantaged couples follow egalitarian earnings patterns characterized by joint earnings instability. By taking a long-term approach, this study provides insight into the varied ways gender equality in earnings manifests among married couples and reveals an important and understudied dimension of economic homogamy: the concentration of economic stability and instability within couples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility is dedicated to publishing the highest, most innovative research on issues of social inequality from a broad diversity of theoretical and methodological perspectives. The journal is also dedicated to cutting edge summaries of prior research and fruitful exchanges that will stimulate future research on issues of social inequality. The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信