对人工智能歧视性决定的看法:解读个体特征的作用

IF 5.3 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Soojong Kim
{"title":"对人工智能歧视性决定的看法:解读个体特征的作用","authors":"Soojong Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how personal differences (digital self-efficacy, technical knowledge, belief in equality, political ideology) and demographic factors (age, education, and income) are associated with perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) outcomes exhibiting gender and racial bias and with general attitudes toward AI. Analyses of a large-scale experiment dataset (<em>N</em> = 1,206) indicate that digital self-efficacy and technical knowledge are positively associated with attitudes toward AI, while liberal ideologies are negatively associated with outcome trust, higher negative emotion, and greater skepticism. Furthermore, age and income are closely connected to cognitive gaps in understanding discriminatory AI outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of promoting digital literacy skills and enhancing digital self-efficacy to maintain trust in AI and beliefs in AI usefulness and safety. The findings also suggest that the disparities in understanding problematic AI outcomes may be aligned with economic inequalities and generational gaps in society. Overall, this study sheds light on the socio-technological system in which complex interactions occur between social hierarchies, divisions, and machines that reflect and exacerbate the disparities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 103387"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of discriminatory decisions of artificial intelligence: Unpacking the role of individual characteristics\",\"authors\":\"Soojong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates how personal differences (digital self-efficacy, technical knowledge, belief in equality, political ideology) and demographic factors (age, education, and income) are associated with perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) outcomes exhibiting gender and racial bias and with general attitudes toward AI. Analyses of a large-scale experiment dataset (<em>N</em> = 1,206) indicate that digital self-efficacy and technical knowledge are positively associated with attitudes toward AI, while liberal ideologies are negatively associated with outcome trust, higher negative emotion, and greater skepticism. Furthermore, age and income are closely connected to cognitive gaps in understanding discriminatory AI outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of promoting digital literacy skills and enhancing digital self-efficacy to maintain trust in AI and beliefs in AI usefulness and safety. The findings also suggest that the disparities in understanding problematic AI outcomes may be aligned with economic inequalities and generational gaps in society. Overall, this study sheds light on the socio-technological system in which complex interactions occur between social hierarchies, divisions, and machines that reflect and exacerbate the disparities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581924001708\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581924001708","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了个人差异(数字自我效能、技术知识、平等信念、政治意识形态)和人口因素(年龄、教育和收入)如何与对人工智能(AI)结果的性别和种族偏见的看法以及对人工智能的总体态度相关联。对大规模实验数据集(N = 1,206)的分析表明,数字自我效能感和技术知识与对人工智能的态度呈正相关,而自由意识形态与结果信任、较高的负面情绪和较强的怀疑态度呈负相关。此外,年龄和收入与理解歧视性人工智能结果的认知差距密切相关。这些发现凸显了促进数字扫盲技能和提高数字自我效能对于保持对人工智能的信任以及对人工智能有用性和安全性的信念的重要性。研究结果还表明,在理解有问题的人工智能结果方面存在的差异可能与社会中的经济不平等和代沟有关。总之,这项研究揭示了社会-技术系统,在这个系统中,社会等级、分工和机器之间发生着复杂的相互作用,反映并加剧了差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of discriminatory decisions of artificial intelligence: Unpacking the role of individual characteristics
This study investigates how personal differences (digital self-efficacy, technical knowledge, belief in equality, political ideology) and demographic factors (age, education, and income) are associated with perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) outcomes exhibiting gender and racial bias and with general attitudes toward AI. Analyses of a large-scale experiment dataset (N = 1,206) indicate that digital self-efficacy and technical knowledge are positively associated with attitudes toward AI, while liberal ideologies are negatively associated with outcome trust, higher negative emotion, and greater skepticism. Furthermore, age and income are closely connected to cognitive gaps in understanding discriminatory AI outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of promoting digital literacy skills and enhancing digital self-efficacy to maintain trust in AI and beliefs in AI usefulness and safety. The findings also suggest that the disparities in understanding problematic AI outcomes may be aligned with economic inequalities and generational gaps in society. Overall, this study sheds light on the socio-technological system in which complex interactions occur between social hierarchies, divisions, and machines that reflect and exacerbate the disparities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Human-Computer Studies publishes original research over the whole spectrum of work relevant to the theory and practice of innovative interactive systems. The journal is inherently interdisciplinary, covering research in computing, artificial intelligence, psychology, linguistics, communication, design, engineering, and social organization, which is relevant to the design, analysis, evaluation and application of innovative interactive systems. Papers at the boundaries of these disciplines are especially welcome, as it is our view that interdisciplinary approaches are needed for producing theoretical insights in this complex area and for effective deployment of innovative technologies in concrete user communities. Research areas relevant to the journal include, but are not limited to: • Innovative interaction techniques • Multimodal interaction • Speech interaction • Graphic interaction • Natural language interaction • Interaction in mobile and embedded systems • Interface design and evaluation methodologies • Design and evaluation of innovative interactive systems • User interface prototyping and management systems • Ubiquitous computing • Wearable computers • Pervasive computing • Affective computing • Empirical studies of user behaviour • Empirical studies of programming and software engineering • Computer supported cooperative work • Computer mediated communication • Virtual reality • Mixed and augmented Reality • Intelligent user interfaces • Presence ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信