Luis Suárez Nieto , Gregorio Fidalgo Valverde , Alicja Krzemień , Pedro Riesgo Fernández , Francisco Javier Iglesias Rodríguez
{"title":"矿业投资的经济风险:铜矿开采项目资本成本估算的前瞻性分析","authors":"Luis Suárez Nieto , Gregorio Fidalgo Valverde , Alicja Krzemień , Pedro Riesgo Fernández , Francisco Javier Iglesias Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mining projects are highly exposed to cost overruns, ahead of oil and gas, power generation and infrastructure projects. Precisely, warnings related to sharp increases in capital and production costs of around 40% are expected to be found in the corresponding literature. This paper analyses the economic risks related to capital cost presented by public investment offers in copper mining projects. To detect the economic risks of copper mining projects presented to the public, the research pays particular attention to the existing methodologies for the valuation of mining assets, as well as for the preparation of technical reports with internationally recognised codes that aim to offer the expert in charge of the valuation a series of guidelines to carry out this work. For this purpose, an in-depth study and analysis of four National Instrument 41–101 technical reports of current copper mining projects selected following criteria of geographic, business, exploitation and size diversification is carried out: Arctic Project (Northwest Alaska, United States), Kutcho Project (British Columbia, Canada), Josemaría Copper-Gold Project (San Juan, Argentina) and Eva Copper Project (Queensland, Australia). The research concludes that it would be advisable that mining companies and, especially, Competent persons responsible for preparing technical reports apply the recommended practices, being extremely conservative with the ranges of precision and contingencies contemplated in each phase. It should be a significant turning point for the sector, which, to prosper and reinforce investment decisions, must leverage transmitting trust, transparency, cleanliness and professionalism to the market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 105427"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic risks in mining investments: A prospective analysis of capital cost estimation in copper mining projects\",\"authors\":\"Luis Suárez Nieto , Gregorio Fidalgo Valverde , Alicja Krzemień , Pedro Riesgo Fernández , Francisco Javier Iglesias Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mining projects are highly exposed to cost overruns, ahead of oil and gas, power generation and infrastructure projects. Precisely, warnings related to sharp increases in capital and production costs of around 40% are expected to be found in the corresponding literature. This paper analyses the economic risks related to capital cost presented by public investment offers in copper mining projects. To detect the economic risks of copper mining projects presented to the public, the research pays particular attention to the existing methodologies for the valuation of mining assets, as well as for the preparation of technical reports with internationally recognised codes that aim to offer the expert in charge of the valuation a series of guidelines to carry out this work. For this purpose, an in-depth study and analysis of four National Instrument 41–101 technical reports of current copper mining projects selected following criteria of geographic, business, exploitation and size diversification is carried out: Arctic Project (Northwest Alaska, United States), Kutcho Project (British Columbia, Canada), Josemaría Copper-Gold Project (San Juan, Argentina) and Eva Copper Project (Queensland, Australia). The research concludes that it would be advisable that mining companies and, especially, Competent persons responsible for preparing technical reports apply the recommended practices, being extremely conservative with the ranges of precision and contingencies contemplated in each phase. It should be a significant turning point for the sector, which, to prosper and reinforce investment decisions, must leverage transmitting trust, transparency, cleanliness and professionalism to the market.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007943\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007943","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
与石油和天然气、发电和基础设施项目相比,采矿项目极易出现成本超支。确切地说,在相应的文献中可以发现与资本和生产成本急剧增加 40% 左右有关的警告。本文分析了铜矿项目公共投资报价中与资本成本相关的经济风险。为了发现铜矿开采项目的经济风险,本研究特别关注了现有的矿业资产评估方法,以及国际公认的技术报告编写规范,这些规范旨在为负责评估的专家提供一系列开展这项工作的指导。为此,我们对目前铜矿项目的四份国家文件 41-101 技术报告进行了深入研究和分析,这些报告是按照地理、业务、开采和规模多样化的标准选定的:北极项目(美国阿拉斯加西北部)、Kutcho 项目(加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省)、Josemaría 铜金项目(阿根廷圣胡安)和 Eva 铜矿项目(澳大利亚昆士兰)。研究得出的结论是,矿业公司,尤其是负责编写技术报告的合资格人士,最好采用建议的做法,对每个阶段的精度范围和考虑的意外情况采取极为保守的态度。这应该是该行业的一个重要转折点,该行业要想繁荣和加强投资决策,就必须向市场传递信任、透明、廉洁和专业精神。
Economic risks in mining investments: A prospective analysis of capital cost estimation in copper mining projects
Mining projects are highly exposed to cost overruns, ahead of oil and gas, power generation and infrastructure projects. Precisely, warnings related to sharp increases in capital and production costs of around 40% are expected to be found in the corresponding literature. This paper analyses the economic risks related to capital cost presented by public investment offers in copper mining projects. To detect the economic risks of copper mining projects presented to the public, the research pays particular attention to the existing methodologies for the valuation of mining assets, as well as for the preparation of technical reports with internationally recognised codes that aim to offer the expert in charge of the valuation a series of guidelines to carry out this work. For this purpose, an in-depth study and analysis of four National Instrument 41–101 technical reports of current copper mining projects selected following criteria of geographic, business, exploitation and size diversification is carried out: Arctic Project (Northwest Alaska, United States), Kutcho Project (British Columbia, Canada), Josemaría Copper-Gold Project (San Juan, Argentina) and Eva Copper Project (Queensland, Australia). The research concludes that it would be advisable that mining companies and, especially, Competent persons responsible for preparing technical reports apply the recommended practices, being extremely conservative with the ranges of precision and contingencies contemplated in each phase. It should be a significant turning point for the sector, which, to prosper and reinforce investment decisions, must leverage transmitting trust, transparency, cleanliness and professionalism to the market.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.