碳调整投资组合选择:反事实分析

IF 2.1 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Mohammed Kharbach, Amine Ben Amar, Hafid Lalioui
{"title":"碳调整投资组合选择:反事实分析","authors":"Mohammed Kharbach,&nbsp;Amine Ben Amar,&nbsp;Hafid Lalioui","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2024.112071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate investor behavior in a counterfactual scenario where shareholders are subject to a carbon tax, and we compare the structure and performance of the carbon-adjusted portfolio to those of the mean-variance portfolio. Results suggest that applying such a tax does not lead to significant changes in portfolio structure. The impact on performance becomes relatively noticeable only if the tax is particularly stringent. Therefore, implementing a carbon tax could be justified, as it may support decarbonization, at least partially, without significantly affecting investors’ economic outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11468,"journal":{"name":"Economics Letters","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 112071"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon-adjusted portfolio selection: A counterfactual analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Kharbach,&nbsp;Amine Ben Amar,&nbsp;Hafid Lalioui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econlet.2024.112071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We investigate investor behavior in a counterfactual scenario where shareholders are subject to a carbon tax, and we compare the structure and performance of the carbon-adjusted portfolio to those of the mean-variance portfolio. Results suggest that applying such a tax does not lead to significant changes in portfolio structure. The impact on performance becomes relatively noticeable only if the tax is particularly stringent. Therefore, implementing a carbon tax could be justified, as it may support decarbonization, at least partially, without significantly affecting investors’ economic outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics Letters\",\"volume\":\"246 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652400555X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652400555X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了在股东需缴纳碳税的反事实情景下的投资者行为,并比较了碳调整投资组合与均值方差投资组合的结构和表现。结果表明,征收碳税不会导致投资组合结构发生重大变化。只有当征税特别严格时,对业绩的影响才会相对明显。因此,实施碳税是合理的,因为它可以支持去碳化,至少是部分支持,而不会对投资者的经济结果产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carbon-adjusted portfolio selection: A counterfactual analysis
We investigate investor behavior in a counterfactual scenario where shareholders are subject to a carbon tax, and we compare the structure and performance of the carbon-adjusted portfolio to those of the mean-variance portfolio. Results suggest that applying such a tax does not lead to significant changes in portfolio structure. The impact on performance becomes relatively noticeable only if the tax is particularly stringent. Therefore, implementing a carbon tax could be justified, as it may support decarbonization, at least partially, without significantly affecting investors’ economic outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economics Letters
Economics Letters ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
348
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Many economists today are concerned by the proliferation of journals and the concomitant labyrinth of research to be conquered in order to reach the specific information they require. To combat this tendency, Economics Letters has been conceived and designed outside the realm of the traditional economics journal. As a Letters Journal, it consists of concise communications (letters) that provide a means of rapid and efficient dissemination of new results, models and methods in all fields of economic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信