{"title":"水氢混合动力系统的灵活运行空间","authors":"Yu Gong , Tingxi Liu , Pan Liu , Limin Duan","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Schedulable hydropower and hydrogen power provide essential flexibility to mitigate variability of renewables such as wind and photovoltaic power. Previous research has focused on the flexibility of power systems utilizing a single adjustable source (e.g., hydropower). However, joint flexibility of combining adjustable hydropower and hydrogen power has rarely been explored simultaneously. This study aims to establish a joint flexible operation framework for hydro–hydrogen–wind–photovoltaic hybrid power systems. Initially, the forecast uncertainties are quantified regarding the inflow as well as the combined wind and photovoltaic power. Subsequently, a tri-objective optimization model is formulated to maximize operation benefits while enhancing joint flexibility in managing water levels and allocating power to hydrogen production, deriving the flexible operation space. Finally, the operation space's effectiveness is validated by stochastic simulation. Results from a case study using China's Ertan hydro–hydrogen–wind–photovoltaic hybrid power system indicated that the minimum operation benefit derived from the decisions within the operation space decreased with increasing flexibilities of both the water level and power allocation to hydrogen production. The benefit loss (i.e., the gap between the theoretical maximum and actual benefits) decreased by 26.53 %, from 3.77 to 2.77 million CNY, through maintaining operation decisions within the flexible space during a hypothetical earthquake emergency. This was achieved by adjusting 1.79 % release and 10.71 % hydrogen production power. The proposed method provides implications of jointly utilizing flexibilities of adjustable power sources to decrease economic loss. This research contributes to reducing energy emissions by improving energy use efficiency of power systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 115114"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexible operation space of hydro–hydrogen–based hybrid power systems\",\"authors\":\"Yu Gong , Tingxi Liu , Pan Liu , Limin Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Schedulable hydropower and hydrogen power provide essential flexibility to mitigate variability of renewables such as wind and photovoltaic power. Previous research has focused on the flexibility of power systems utilizing a single adjustable source (e.g., hydropower). However, joint flexibility of combining adjustable hydropower and hydrogen power has rarely been explored simultaneously. This study aims to establish a joint flexible operation framework for hydro–hydrogen–wind–photovoltaic hybrid power systems. Initially, the forecast uncertainties are quantified regarding the inflow as well as the combined wind and photovoltaic power. Subsequently, a tri-objective optimization model is formulated to maximize operation benefits while enhancing joint flexibility in managing water levels and allocating power to hydrogen production, deriving the flexible operation space. Finally, the operation space's effectiveness is validated by stochastic simulation. Results from a case study using China's Ertan hydro–hydrogen–wind–photovoltaic hybrid power system indicated that the minimum operation benefit derived from the decisions within the operation space decreased with increasing flexibilities of both the water level and power allocation to hydrogen production. The benefit loss (i.e., the gap between the theoretical maximum and actual benefits) decreased by 26.53 %, from 3.77 to 2.77 million CNY, through maintaining operation decisions within the flexible space during a hypothetical earthquake emergency. This was achieved by adjusting 1.79 % release and 10.71 % hydrogen production power. The proposed method provides implications of jointly utilizing flexibilities of adjustable power sources to decrease economic loss. This research contributes to reducing energy emissions by improving energy use efficiency of power systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124008402\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124008402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flexible operation space of hydro–hydrogen–based hybrid power systems
Schedulable hydropower and hydrogen power provide essential flexibility to mitigate variability of renewables such as wind and photovoltaic power. Previous research has focused on the flexibility of power systems utilizing a single adjustable source (e.g., hydropower). However, joint flexibility of combining adjustable hydropower and hydrogen power has rarely been explored simultaneously. This study aims to establish a joint flexible operation framework for hydro–hydrogen–wind–photovoltaic hybrid power systems. Initially, the forecast uncertainties are quantified regarding the inflow as well as the combined wind and photovoltaic power. Subsequently, a tri-objective optimization model is formulated to maximize operation benefits while enhancing joint flexibility in managing water levels and allocating power to hydrogen production, deriving the flexible operation space. Finally, the operation space's effectiveness is validated by stochastic simulation. Results from a case study using China's Ertan hydro–hydrogen–wind–photovoltaic hybrid power system indicated that the minimum operation benefit derived from the decisions within the operation space decreased with increasing flexibilities of both the water level and power allocation to hydrogen production. The benefit loss (i.e., the gap between the theoretical maximum and actual benefits) decreased by 26.53 %, from 3.77 to 2.77 million CNY, through maintaining operation decisions within the flexible space during a hypothetical earthquake emergency. This was achieved by adjusting 1.79 % release and 10.71 % hydrogen production power. The proposed method provides implications of jointly utilizing flexibilities of adjustable power sources to decrease economic loss. This research contributes to reducing energy emissions by improving energy use efficiency of power systems.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.