Chaoqi Wang, Zhi Dou, Yan Zhu, Chao Zhuang, Ze Yang, Zhihan Zou
{"title":"利用多模态神经网络模型整合水头和示踪剂数据,加强水力传导性现场表征","authors":"Chaoqi Wang, Zhi Dou, Yan Zhu, Chao Zhuang, Ze Yang, Zhihan Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Characterizing heterogeneous conductivity field is essential for effective groundwater management and controlling contaminant events. The characterization method is currently advancing towards two promising directions: (1) integration of various types of data, such as hydraulic head (<em>H</em>) and tracer concentration (<em>C</em>) data; (2) usage of machine learning methods of AI area. However, no machine learning model has been proposed to integrate <em>H</em> and <em>C</em> data for aquifer characterization effectively. The two data types have different forms: <em>H</em> data being spatial and <em>C</em> data being temporal. This discrepancy creates challenges for effective integration.</div><div>We developed three machine learning models—HydroCNN, HC-Net1, and HC-Net2. The HydroCNN model could effectively predict hydraulic conductivity (<em>K</em>) fields from <em>H</em> data alone and thus is used as the baseline for evaluating the following models. HC-Net1 and HC-Net2 models are multi-modal neural network models with different architectures. These multi-modal architectures incorporate both convolutional neural network and fully connected neural network modules, designed to integrate <em>H</em> and <em>C</em> data to enhance characterization accuracy. Results indicate that HC-Net2 significantly outperforms the other models, highlighting its capability to leverage the strengths of both data types effectively. Notably, the HC-Net2 model’s improvement is most significant in scenarios where models relying solely on <em>H</em> data perform poorly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"647 ","pages":"Article 132295"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing hydraulic conductivity field characterization through integration of hydraulic head and tracer data using multi-modal neural network models\",\"authors\":\"Chaoqi Wang, Zhi Dou, Yan Zhu, Chao Zhuang, Ze Yang, Zhihan Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Characterizing heterogeneous conductivity field is essential for effective groundwater management and controlling contaminant events. The characterization method is currently advancing towards two promising directions: (1) integration of various types of data, such as hydraulic head (<em>H</em>) and tracer concentration (<em>C</em>) data; (2) usage of machine learning methods of AI area. However, no machine learning model has been proposed to integrate <em>H</em> and <em>C</em> data for aquifer characterization effectively. The two data types have different forms: <em>H</em> data being spatial and <em>C</em> data being temporal. This discrepancy creates challenges for effective integration.</div><div>We developed three machine learning models—HydroCNN, HC-Net1, and HC-Net2. The HydroCNN model could effectively predict hydraulic conductivity (<em>K</em>) fields from <em>H</em> data alone and thus is used as the baseline for evaluating the following models. HC-Net1 and HC-Net2 models are multi-modal neural network models with different architectures. These multi-modal architectures incorporate both convolutional neural network and fully connected neural network modules, designed to integrate <em>H</em> and <em>C</em> data to enhance characterization accuracy. Results indicate that HC-Net2 significantly outperforms the other models, highlighting its capability to leverage the strengths of both data types effectively. Notably, the HC-Net2 model’s improvement is most significant in scenarios where models relying solely on <em>H</em> data perform poorly.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"647 \",\"pages\":\"Article 132295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424016913\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424016913","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
表征异质传导场对于有效管理地下水和控制污染物事件至关重要。目前,表征方法正朝着两个有前途的方向发展:(1)整合各类数据,如水头(H)和示踪浓度(C)数据;(2)使用人工智能领域的机器学习方法。然而,目前还没有提出有效整合 H 和 C 数据用于含水层特征描述的机器学习模型。这两种数据类型具有不同的形式:H 数据是空间数据,C 数据是时间数据。我们开发了三种机器学习模型--HydroCNN、HC-Net1 和 HC-Net2。HydroCNN 模型可以仅通过 H 数据有效预测水力传导性(K)场,因此被用作评估以下模型的基准。HC-Net1 和 HC-Net2 模型是具有不同架构的多模式神经网络模型。这些多模态架构包含卷积神经网络和全连接神经网络模块,旨在整合 H 和 C 数据以提高表征精度。结果表明,HC-Net2 的性能明显优于其他模型,突出了其有效利用两种数据类型优势的能力。值得注意的是,HC-Net2 模型在仅依靠 H 数据的模型表现不佳的情况下改进最为显著。
Enhancing hydraulic conductivity field characterization through integration of hydraulic head and tracer data using multi-modal neural network models
Characterizing heterogeneous conductivity field is essential for effective groundwater management and controlling contaminant events. The characterization method is currently advancing towards two promising directions: (1) integration of various types of data, such as hydraulic head (H) and tracer concentration (C) data; (2) usage of machine learning methods of AI area. However, no machine learning model has been proposed to integrate H and C data for aquifer characterization effectively. The two data types have different forms: H data being spatial and C data being temporal. This discrepancy creates challenges for effective integration.
We developed three machine learning models—HydroCNN, HC-Net1, and HC-Net2. The HydroCNN model could effectively predict hydraulic conductivity (K) fields from H data alone and thus is used as the baseline for evaluating the following models. HC-Net1 and HC-Net2 models are multi-modal neural network models with different architectures. These multi-modal architectures incorporate both convolutional neural network and fully connected neural network modules, designed to integrate H and C data to enhance characterization accuracy. Results indicate that HC-Net2 significantly outperforms the other models, highlighting its capability to leverage the strengths of both data types effectively. Notably, the HC-Net2 model’s improvement is most significant in scenarios where models relying solely on H data perform poorly.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.