针对灵活工作场所的以占用者为中心的分区设计框架:占用模型和建筑运行的影响

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Eikichi Ono , Adrian Chong , Khee Poh Lam
{"title":"针对灵活工作场所的以占用者为中心的分区设计框架:占用模型和建筑运行的影响","authors":"Eikichi Ono ,&nbsp;Adrian Chong ,&nbsp;Khee Poh Lam","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flexible workplaces offer the potential to enhance occupants’ thermal comfort and building energy performance through space selectivity. However, the effects of occupants’ space selection on optimal zoning layouts and the resulting operational performance remain underexplored. This study investigates an occupant-centric zoning design framework, focusing on the influence of occupancy modeling and building operation. We analyzed three scenarios in a retrofit building project: zone-level schedule, agent-based model (ABM) with occupant-centric control (OCC), and ABM with OCC and an elastic comfort-driven workplace strategy, in which occupants choose a space with a preferable thermal condition and a space opens only when an additional workspace demand occurs. The results showed that combining ABM with OCC and the workplace strategy resulted in more feasible solutions with unique zoning layouts, including thermal conditions. In contrast, the layouts generated by ABM with OCC, without the workplace strategy, showed an excess sensitivity to input data and controls, suggesting that ABM might not perform well when not introducing an appropriate context into the design problem. Additionally, ABM with OCC and the workplace strategy achieved a 6<span><math><mtext>%</mtext></math></span>–8<span><math><mtext>%</mtext></math></span> increase in the percentage of comfortable occupants while reducing the building energy usage by 9<span><math><mtext>%</mtext></math></span>–13<span><math><mtext>%</mtext></math></span>, highlighting the considerable potential of flexible workplaces to improve thermal comfort and building energy performance beyond the constraints of zone-level HVAC control. The findings emphasize the critical role of considering the interaction between occupants, zoning layout, and building operation when designing flexible workplaces from an occupant-centric perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"267 ","pages":"Article 112294"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupant-centric zoning design framework for flexible workplaces: Impact of occupancy modeling and building operation\",\"authors\":\"Eikichi Ono ,&nbsp;Adrian Chong ,&nbsp;Khee Poh Lam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Flexible workplaces offer the potential to enhance occupants’ thermal comfort and building energy performance through space selectivity. However, the effects of occupants’ space selection on optimal zoning layouts and the resulting operational performance remain underexplored. This study investigates an occupant-centric zoning design framework, focusing on the influence of occupancy modeling and building operation. We analyzed three scenarios in a retrofit building project: zone-level schedule, agent-based model (ABM) with occupant-centric control (OCC), and ABM with OCC and an elastic comfort-driven workplace strategy, in which occupants choose a space with a preferable thermal condition and a space opens only when an additional workspace demand occurs. The results showed that combining ABM with OCC and the workplace strategy resulted in more feasible solutions with unique zoning layouts, including thermal conditions. In contrast, the layouts generated by ABM with OCC, without the workplace strategy, showed an excess sensitivity to input data and controls, suggesting that ABM might not perform well when not introducing an appropriate context into the design problem. Additionally, ABM with OCC and the workplace strategy achieved a 6<span><math><mtext>%</mtext></math></span>–8<span><math><mtext>%</mtext></math></span> increase in the percentage of comfortable occupants while reducing the building energy usage by 9<span><math><mtext>%</mtext></math></span>–13<span><math><mtext>%</mtext></math></span>, highlighting the considerable potential of flexible workplaces to improve thermal comfort and building energy performance beyond the constraints of zone-level HVAC control. The findings emphasize the critical role of considering the interaction between occupants, zoning layout, and building operation when designing flexible workplaces from an occupant-centric perspective.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building and Environment\",\"volume\":\"267 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132324011363\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132324011363","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

灵活的工作场所有可能通过空间选择性提高使用者的热舒适度和建筑能效。然而,对于使用者的空间选择对最佳分区布局以及由此产生的运行性能的影响,研究仍然不足。本研究探讨了以居住者为中心的分区设计框架,重点关注居住建模和建筑运行的影响。我们在一个改造建筑项目中分析了三种方案:分区计划、基于代理的模型(ABM)与以占用者为中心的控制(OCC),以及基于代理的模型与 OCC 和弹性舒适驱动的工作场所策略。结果表明,将 ABM 与 OCC 和工作场所策略相结合,可以产生更多具有独特分区布局(包括热条件)的可行解决方案。与此相反,在不考虑工作场所策略的情况下,采用 OCC 的 ABM 生成的布局对输入数据和控制表现出过高的敏感性,这表明如果不在设计问题中引入适当的背景,ABM 可能无法很好地发挥作用。此外,采用 OCC 和工作场所策略的 ABM 使舒适居住者的比例提高了 6%-8%,同时使建筑能耗降低了 9%-13%,这凸显了灵活工作场所在改善热舒适度和建筑能耗性能方面的巨大潜力,超越了区域级暖通空调控制的限制。研究结果强调了从以居住者为中心的角度设计灵活工作场所时,考虑居住者、分区布局和建筑运行之间的相互作用的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Occupant-centric zoning design framework for flexible workplaces: Impact of occupancy modeling and building operation

Occupant-centric zoning design framework for flexible workplaces: Impact of occupancy modeling and building operation
Flexible workplaces offer the potential to enhance occupants’ thermal comfort and building energy performance through space selectivity. However, the effects of occupants’ space selection on optimal zoning layouts and the resulting operational performance remain underexplored. This study investigates an occupant-centric zoning design framework, focusing on the influence of occupancy modeling and building operation. We analyzed three scenarios in a retrofit building project: zone-level schedule, agent-based model (ABM) with occupant-centric control (OCC), and ABM with OCC and an elastic comfort-driven workplace strategy, in which occupants choose a space with a preferable thermal condition and a space opens only when an additional workspace demand occurs. The results showed that combining ABM with OCC and the workplace strategy resulted in more feasible solutions with unique zoning layouts, including thermal conditions. In contrast, the layouts generated by ABM with OCC, without the workplace strategy, showed an excess sensitivity to input data and controls, suggesting that ABM might not perform well when not introducing an appropriate context into the design problem. Additionally, ABM with OCC and the workplace strategy achieved a 6%–8% increase in the percentage of comfortable occupants while reducing the building energy usage by 9%–13%, highlighting the considerable potential of flexible workplaces to improve thermal comfort and building energy performance beyond the constraints of zone-level HVAC control. The findings emphasize the critical role of considering the interaction between occupants, zoning layout, and building operation when designing flexible workplaces from an occupant-centric perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信